Re: 40% Overunity??

Dusty Rhodes ( dusty1@sat.net )
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 15:14:20 -0600

Hi there Ken, Neighbors,

Sounds to me like you hit the nail on the head as far as the voltage without the
current. That's what he had to be doing to get the resultant 'cold' power. Once he
choked off the current on one of these extremely fast rising pulses, the potential
voltage would continue on the external of the conductor of course! And the motor
doesn't care that current is not actually flowing as long as there is a potential
difference between the poles in the motor.
Power that powers without actually going anywhere. Too cool. And I bet that Tesla
has been jumping down in his grave trying to get everybody to look.

Dusty

Kenneth Carrigan wrote:

> Jer et all..
> Very interesting but nothing new... What I am interesting in is those
> virtual particles and extracting them! This is what Telsa was operating
> on.. at least what I think he was trying to do. It takes an impulse or Dirac
> pulse to shake some of them loose. Semiconductors can not 'slew'
> fast enough and/or do not posses characteristics which requires very
> high potential to shake them loose. What is desired is a filter where
> electrons can not pass but virtual particles could. Potential without current!
> The higher the potential or E-field (with very high impedance) the more
> carriers or virtual particles present, and with Hiesenbergs uncertanty
> principle.. the E=MC^2 conversions take place as electrons exchange
> photons. Any object with electric charge is surrounded be a swarm of
> photons.. which have energy. These photons on occassion can transform
> into virtual pairs.. Hiesenberg...and when Dirac pulses are present.. these
> charged negative/positive virtual particles may break appart.. where the
> positive particle (positron) is attracted to the electron and the negative
> virtual antiparticle .. just maybe what is sent down the conductor.. where
> Telsa noted certain types of characteristics.. like heat, pain, force... and
> other properties like lighting bulbs which are thought to be short circuited!
>
> Not sure.. but just a thought. You could almost call this Telsa energy
> "negative" energy cause if it is virtual negative antiparticles... It certaintly
> would exhibit different properties, not like an electron which would be
> much much heavier. Hey.. Just a though! Got my attention for sure!
>
> v/r Ken Carrigan
>
> >Hi Ken et al!
> >
> >Ok, I'll bite...check this animation showing the fields produced from
> >a point charge and it ties into the Lorentz contraction;
> >
> >http://webphysics.davidson.edu/Applets/Lorentz/Lorentz_FEL.html
> >=========================
> >Dirac delta function having unbounded height and zero width;
> >
> >http://liley.physics.swin.oz.au/~dtl/sp407/backproj/node12.html
> >=========================
> >Electron as a cloud rather than a point charge;
> >
> >http://purduenews.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/newspix97/pix59.html
> >=========================
> >Interesting URL on electromagnetic waves showing it is the electric
> >field we most commonly use;
> >
> >http://maxwell.byu.edu/~spencerr/websumm122/node115.html
> >=========================
> >---Kenneth Carrigan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >Hi Ken et al!
> >> >
> >> >I was puzzled by your use of the term DIAC or DIRAC.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> YES!! I typo'd it wrong.. I meant Dirac! Thanks! Laplace
> >> transforms, fourier series, etc.. Dirac.
> >>
> >> Impulse symbol... it is a intense unit-area pulse so brief
> >> that measuring equipment of a given resolving power
> >> is unable to distinguish between them and even briefer
> >> pulses. The important part or attribute is the integration
> >> or integral... Heaviside used it extensively... but Dirac
> >> introduced it from quantum machanics and caught on.
> >> The underlying concept permeates physics!! Point masses,
> >> point charges, point sources, concentrated forces, line
> >> sources, surface charges, and lots more! LOL... Of course
> >> all these thing do NOT exist! Or .. we have not seen them
> >> exist YET! <g>
> >>
> >> The concept value stems from the fact that the impulse
> >> response - the effect associated with the impulse (point
> >> mass.. point charges..) maybe indistingusihable from the
> >> response due to a psychical realizable pulse.
> >>
> >> For sure the answers are close... this Pulse answers LOTS
> >> of questions associated with Bio energies, from our bodies
> >> emissions to emissivity to correcting auros... healing our bodies.
> >> Also. Telsa noted Force, pain, heat was an outcome of this
> >> Arc or impulse... LOTS to look at here....
> >>
> >> To say the least... I am thrilled to no end! Finally.. somewhere to
> >> look for answers that Physics can address also.
> >>
> >> v/r Ken Carrigan
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >DO YOU YAHOO!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------