----------
> From: Hexslinger <hexslngr@internet-frontier.net>
> To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
> Subject: Re: INFO NEEDED ABOUT AMMOUNT OF FUEL IT WOULD TAKE TO
ACCELERATE FTL
> Date: Sunday, May 17, 1998 4:05 AM
>
>
>
> On Sun, 17 May 1998 ufotruth@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > Everyone,
> >
> > I need some information. I need to know how much fuel it would take for
a
> > craft, probe, or spaceship to accelerate past the speed of light. Now,
I
> > know what you all are going to say. That you cannot travel faster than
light
> > by conventional methods like rocketry. But I have been reading about a
new
> > theory called "autodynamics" which eliminates time dilation and mass
> > increase while accelerating to and past the speed of light.
> >
> > So how much fuel would it take for a craft, probe, or spaceship to
> > accelerate past the speed of light?
>
> It's not possible. All mass is merely bubbles in the aether --
> electromagnetic waves (if you can call them that) are but ripples in the
> aether. You cannot exceed the speed of light unless you can find a way to
> alter the density of the aether itself. To understand the absurdity of
the
> notion of using some 'killer rocket fuel' to blow past the speed of light
> -- just imagine someone trying to exceed the speed of sound, using sound
> itself. Cant do it. The only way to exceed the speed of SOUND is to
> utilize a higher force that has a greater speed. Now think -- the speed
of
> light has to be there for a REASON. Consequently, that which we call the
> 'aether' (or 'virtual particle flux' or whatever the buzzword of the day
> is), is not all there is to the universe. The propagation of waves thru
> the aether is limited by a HIGHER force.
>
> Thus: Your only solution is to discover the nature of this 'higher force'
> and find a way to manipulate it. FYI: Not to get cliched, but: 'as above,
> so below' (and, in this case: VICE VERSA). If one wishes to access this
> 'higher force' - one need only to postulate it's properties, and then,
> utilize the forces underneath it to manipulate it. (Heated air from a hot
> road causes light to bend, does it not? The lower affects the higher -
> and vice versa.)
>
> Oh - and lastly - the ultimate reason that mass cannot exceed the speed
of
> light is because light ('aetheric waves' if you will) form the core of
> every particle of mass. Hence, mass cannot exceed the speed of light.
>
>
> I know that wasn't what you were looking for - but I'm in a mood to
> rant... it's funny that you brought it up when you did, since it was
> something I was thinking about recently (due to some unrelated work).
> A pleasant coincidence, I suppose. I firmly believe that there exists a
> force beyond the aether. However, I refuse to discuss it's properties
> until I can conduct experiments to prove it... although I've got some
good
> ideas as to what they might be.
>
> [Oh: And while I'm ranting -- has anyone ever tried proving if a caduceus
> coil isn't just an overblown 'laser light'? I've got good money that says
> that the electric field and magnetic field are the same damn thing - and
> that the magnetic field is really just charge that is being scattered
> outward by mass. By collapsing that wave, you're just forcing charge to
> travel along the path of the conductor... hence, creating a laser-like
> source of 'EM' (if it can really be called that anymore).]
>
> Damn, I think that's enough for now... I think I've opened up quite
enough
> cans of worms -- now somebody bite. =)
>
>