Hi everyone,
I wrote to Bruce Perrault to ask him about this. He said he never
told anyone that he didnt build the chlorine device. He said a neighbor
helped to get rid of a vacuum leak in the device. And a new associate of
his not only built one but is considering rebuilding the chlorine setup
for an upcoming conference if he has time. Also he said he was going to
demonstrate some new prototype at the next April
Tesla Conference in Phoeniz Az and again in July giving a workshop at
the Exotic Research conference in Mesa, Az. He went onto to tell me that
this was achieved without radiation. If so he may get the reward money.
The added radiation will allow EXCESS energy to be produced. The
circuitry actually is an improved Gray circuit from his patent. Gray
could run loads four or five times longer with the circuit than with
normal DC or AC power, this by definition fits the term over-unity.
Doesnt it? How much longer do you think
loads will run with my improvements?
I dont know if you have read about his (Perrault) converter tube but it
uses the Bahlmann star-mode for greater regulation. The tube can use
tripoli (very fine grained sand) that has a small amount of chlorine
with or WITHOUT radioactive material. Like all of you I'd prefer without
radiation. The radioactive material increases efficiency many fold. The
radioactive material that he uses comes directly from the earth and is
not harmful. So he claims I dont know about this. Is there such a
thing? The radioactive material from commercial nuclear reactors is the
stuff that is deadly toxic is what
I always heard about. I guess if we could get radium cloride to put
into the new tube designs then we would really be humming! How many
people do you think actually put the radioactive material into the
chlorine tubes?
Why do you think people got poor results with the tube? This is in his
plan drawings! The capture capacitor is an additional componant to the
newer designs. It actually adds energy to the plasma flow in the
converter tube. Does this sound like conventional nuclear energy
conversion to you? Didn't Tesla believe that radiant matter was a
retransmitter of ZPE because it is in tune with it? If this is not a
true Aether converter then what is? But what if it is an Aether
converter? Are we just shying away cause it is using radium? I think
it deserves as much investigation as other things named on this server.
And remember he did claim that it could work WITHOUT the radium. Let's
at least test that part out. Maybe we can
substitute something for radium?
Chris
cjt642@hotmail.com Chris Thomas
http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/crystal/100/index.html Alternate
Energy Research Project
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com