There are many other sources of male and female energies and so this is a
vanishingly small player amyway, And while it is true that there are male and
female energies over global scales the energies are more pronounced from one
country to another.
John Berry
Andreas Christian Nagele wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:26:21AM -0500, Jerry W. Decker wrote:
> > "The North pole of a magnet is NOT the North-SEEKING pole, nor is the
> > South pole the South-SEEKING pole." (isn't the pointer in a compass
> > just a piece of magnetized metal?)
> >
> > "In fact, the North-SEEKING pole of a magnet is ACTUALLY the South pole!
> > The South-SEEKING pole of a magnet is the North pole. The rule to
> > remember is OPPOSITES ATTRACT and SIMILARS REPEL."
> >
> > Note, they didn't use an off the shelf compass, they used a normal
> > magnet and let it decide.
>
> To me this looks like a simple definition problem, of
> a researcher that was unbiased by science-conventions.
>
> Whereas Rawls defines North and South in respect to an imagined
> magnet in the core of the earth, the rest of the world defines
> north and South in respect to a probe (magnet) in the field of the
> earth.
> So a "Northpole" in Rawls documents is what we today label as "Southpole".
> This we need to keep in mind, if we look at Rawls work.
>
> To better understand Rawls position, I propose to append "geographic"
> to all of Rawls poles.
>
> What amazed me is, that in a textbook "Basics of electronic engeneering"
> there was no hint how a N or S-pole is definded.
> >From a physics text book (translated):
> A Northpole is defined as the pole of a magnet-probe pointing towards
> the geographical north of the earth.
>
> Hope this clears up the confusion, if there was any.
>
> In respect to the claimed effects of south/north-pole energy,
> i have made some crude drawings. Here are my thoughts:
>
> I use the normal convention of norht/south-poles as physics does.
>
> If you burry a bar-magnet with the south-pole downside, and north-pole
> up, you should get a magn.field similar as on the geographic Southpole
> in the region above the magnet.
> If Rawls is correct this should have expanding effects.
>
> This would suggest, that in the northern hemisphere energy contracts, and
> in the southern it expands.
> In respect to the theory? of a pear-shaped earth, I guess it is more narrow
> on the geo.North, and broader on the geo.South. What does this theory say?
>
> Please forgive any spelling errors, as english is not my native language.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> email: jackse@wizard.atnet.at
> Andreas Nagele pgp : jackse-pgp@wizard.atnet.at
> (aka Jackse) www : http://beam.to/jackse
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------