--------------30F775AF5044
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
http://www.iinet.net.au/~steveb/danforth/dan1.html
Since we're on the subject of electroliyis, the Mayer design may be of
interest.
Larry
--------------30F775AF5044
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii; name="dan1.html"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dan1.html"
Content-Base: "http://www.iinet.net.au/~steveb/danfor
th/dan1.html"
<BASE HREF="http://www.iinet.net.au/~steveb/danforth/dan1.html">
Having a severe lack of parts diversity here in Sri-Lanka, I was only able toobtain a 24 volt. 8 amp transformer and built my circuitry around that. Thefinal output is 20 volts with Ml reading 10 amps to the pulsing circuit whichgenerates a symetricel squarewave ( 50% duty cycle ) to the flyback inductorconnected in series with the chamber as the schematic shows. The flyback highvoltage spike is directed across the chamber via c* end d*. The use of a highvoltage spike alone, without the current being delivered through the liquid, willnot cause the disassociation to take place. This I verified using an ignitioncoil in place of the inductor and applied the secondary with halfwaverectification and blocking capacitor to prevent burn out to the chamber with noresults. Apparently the current in the water aligns the molecules appropratelyto allow the high voltege spike to do its workr which in my opinion is thestimulation of molecular resonance. Once Stan's unit was made to begin breakdown(which takes 6 to 8 seconds) he was able to reduce both current and voltageto miniscule proportions. I attribute this to sympathetic oscillation of thealigned molecules, requiring very little in the way of additional excitation. Aphenomena akin to Tesla `s super resonance... resulting in Stan discovering that he only had to supply three pulses in ten to satisfy the requirement of the chamber. I have not yet had the opportunity to duplicate this portion of the experiment but,in time I vill.
Duplication of the device described in these pages, however, will produce thephenomena and hopefully launch other enterprising end inventive souls on todesigning their own refined models. It would be nice to have feedback so thatwe can all collectively work to bring about the transition to non-pollutionenergy.
P.S.- Tho electrical circuit is by no means optinised, but representsinstead the result of parts availability here. Any good techniciancould improve on it quite readily.
There are two primary frequencies that produce the best results.They are. 14372 Hz and 43430 Hz. The former is about 50% more efficient,but it seems that just about any frequency between 9 KHz and 143762 KHzworks quite well. 1) This is because the nature of the wave form ( a spike ) isrich in harmonics and one of them is bound to be close to one of the twoprimary frequencies.
Use of permanent magnets may also increase efficiency.I'll give you the outcome of that attempt in my next letter along with theplans for what I hope to be a much improved version.
Note: Sub-harmonics of the two primary frequencies at which dissociation will occur:
43430 Hz 143762 HZSUBHARMONIC SUBHABMONIC1st 21715 HZ 1st 71881 HZ2nd 14476.67 HZ 2nd 47920.67 HZ3rd 15517.5 HZ 3rd 35840.1 HZ4th 8686 Hz 4th 28752.4 HZ
*1500 VOLTS IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR MOLECULAR RINGING TO BEGIN.
The ball is now in your court.
Let's get the game started and have as many players as possible.
>From the legal stand point it can be argued in an international court of lawthat the vital need of this technology by every nation to aleviate the criticalthreat to our environment globally is so greet as to justify nullification ofproprietry rights if those rights are used to delay or prevent distribution ofthe technology and if such delay or prevention - including measured and / orlevied distribution so as to restrict or limit its use, or for the purposes offinancial profit isolate significent economic groups from its use and if suchacts previously mentioned can be shown to cause an increased danger to life,persons involved in such acts can be convicted of intent to do bodily harm bycrime of omission.
(ANY MATERIAL SENT TO `TUNING IN' WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ABOVE WRITER.)
Back to the Mad Scientist's Lair