Re: Three Mile Island

Wm Perry ( (no email) )
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 21:46:14 -1000

the reserves have never "gotten" bigger or smaller. People develop "better"
technologies for finding and extracting them from Mother Earth, where their
time and effort would better be used getting rid of the need for fossil
fuels altogether.
BillP
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Gallop <gallope@planet.curtin.edu.au>
To: KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net <KeelyNet@DallasTexas.net>
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Three Mile Island

>>From: "Harvey Norris" <tesla4@excite.com>
>>To: freenrg-l@eskimo.com
>>Subject: Three Mile Island
>>
>>Since the meltdown in which 40,000 units of mass weight became fused no
>>further orders for nuclear plants have been made in the USA according to
>>cable documentary. Does this mean the nuclear industry is dead? HDN
>
>I wouldn't be surprised if it's the end. There are big moves in France to
>close down all of their existing reactors. I think the impetus for building
>nuclear power plants was a fear that fossil fuels were running out. A
>prediction that has proved to be quite pessimistic considering the world's
>reserves of oil, gas and coal are at an all time high!
>
>Ted Gallop
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> with the body text: leave Keelynet
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> -------------------------------------------------------------