Re: J.G. Gillemore; theory for everythign...?

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:40:34 -0600

Hi RYB et al!

You wrote;
> J.G. Gillmore published ,I think had 3 books published by Health
> Research of Molumneke(?) California... Are they still available ?

I have been keeping in touch with Jerry Gallimore's sister Sandra and
she recently made arrangements with Borderland Sciences to republish
Jerry's excellent books. They aren't ready yet but are in the works.
Originally Health Research was selling them but there was a problem with
copyright which Sandra now holds. This deal is very recent so please
give them a few months to get it all together, but Borderlands is
located at;

http://www.borderlands.com/

> Apparently his 2nd book about health and energy is the most
> interesting... I remember reading about it in his 2nd
> book, talked about Abrams and how to construct radionic/oscilloblast
> devices;gave the different frequencies (waves...) for a variety of
> ailments,etc...

Jerry told me he felt his finest accomplishment was his book 'Transverse
Paraphysics' which had information that had lots of possibilities for
development. He was always so open with his information that he never
managed to profit from it. The book you refer to is one of a three part
set called 'Handbook of Unusual Energies', something like that. I never
bought the set but believe I will when they are republished...this kind
of material just DISAPPEARS so easily so anytime you have the
opportunity to purchase your own book or set, jump on it or risk losing
it forever...

> But most interestingly he stated that Maxwell's equations,the
> original ones,not those distorted by the mathematicians that did
> not understand what he as talking about,explained overunity as
> well as why radionics did work..That Tesla DID understand those
> said equations...and that given the parts and $200-$300(in 76 ?)a
> viable o/u motor could be built and demonstrated by he,Gillmore(?)
>
> I am still wondering why many on this list keep ignoring his
> findings...that HEALTH & O/U are interrelated...
>
> In regards for a theory of everything-I think this might be an
> Achille's heel to many inventors trying to be the next
> Galiloe,Newton,whatever...Heck, if Tesla waited for the theory he
> would have never made most of his experiences...
>
> Maybe this is the number 1 bug affliciting too many inventors
> nowadays...as th state of affairs are,no matter WHAT,their therories
> will never be officilaly recognized by the scientific establishment.
> Heck,Tesla invented Radio and Marconi is credited with it, this
> despite a Court's decision !

As a matter of fact, neither Tesla nor Marconi actually INVENTED radio
despite Tesla finally winning the battle in the Supreme Court and
receiving the patent after his death in 1942.

I don't have the reference handy but I believe the first documented
discovery and testing of radio was by a fellow in South America,
Mercennes or something like that...totally brilliant and far ahead of
many of his time (1800s'). I'll look it up and append the information.

> So,let us say Newman's motor catch on and in 50 yrs from now become
> the de facto motors...-students will read that this o/u principle
> was disovered by emeretious perfessor that won a Nobel prize for
> it and oh yes,the name Newman referred to a "mechanic" that
> popularised the acceptance of the motor by selling it allong with a
> host of other pioneers..100 yrs from now Newman's name will be
> forgotten and the motor known as the N-motor but the name of the
> said professor that "discovered it" will be in all textbooks, he
> will have buildings named after him,a sort of museum about him,
> cited as an example to the youth of that day,etc...
>
> So much for human folly !

Unfortunately, the Newman 'motor' is still highly questionable. I don't
want to open a can of worms as this subject has nearly destroyed a
couple of discussion lists with spam postings slamming anyone who
remotely disputed the claims and I simply won't allow that to happen
here.

It has been about 20 years now that Newman has been in the public eye
and STILL the Newman motor as testable hardware is a myth. Why? Because
no one knows enough to build and prove it independently. Why? Because
details are simply not present or given.

As I've said before, I happen to like Joe as a person, he seems sincere
and very dedicated but without a working model that absolutely verifies
the claims of overunity, that absolutely can be independently tested and
duplicated by others, its just smoke and mirrors. Please check out;

http://www.phact.org/e/skeptic/biss.htm

for what claims to be an inside report on the Newman Motor, it includes
the Newman camp response....sorry but at this point, its a myth like so
many others....

> Yours,ryb.....

--            Jerry Wayne Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com         http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"      Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187