Larry
..
Chuck Henderson wrote:
>
> Hi Larry and Folks,
>
> Okay Larry, if it is the same thing, then why is it that Keely's
> disassociation process provided sufficient explosive force to fire
> a projectile from an accoustic cannon, as demonstrated to the
> U.S. Army and the simple electrolysis device that I can assemble
> on my kitchen counter will just set there and change water into
> it's component parts (H2 + O)? No bang, no great explosive force,
> just a slow and quite separation of atoms. There was no fuse or
> flame used with Keely's cannon, so what is different?
>
> Sorry Larry, but I don't see the processes as being the same.
> I think that Keely's process, instead of simply cutting the energy bonds
> between the atoms, actually released the energy that make up
> those bonds.
>
> Later...
>
> Chuck...
>
> ----------
> > From: LARRY SULLIVAN <polymercanada@bc.sympatico.ca>
> > To: Jerry Wayne Decker <jwdatwork@yahoo.com> NickandSim@aol.com;
> wperry3092@worldnet.att.net; keelynet@DallasTexas.net
> > Subject: Re: hydrogen generator
> > Date: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 9:07 PM
> >
> > O.K. Guys:
> > I said it once before, and I will say it agaim,Sam! It's all how you
> > look at it, some say toma'to some say to'mato, it's all the same.
> > You're talking about the same thing that is disassociating molecular
> > bonds and which is more effiecent.
> >
> > Larry
> > LARRY SULLIVAN wrote:
> > >
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Your following message has been delivered to the 317 members of
> > > the list keelynet@DallasTexas.net at 18:12:01 on 16 Feb 1999.
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I think you guys are talking about the some thing, different termilogy
> > > but same stuff. Draw a line between the dots!Da!
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> > > Jerry Wayne Decker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Nick et al!
> > > >
> > > > Well, Nick, that's kind of true, but Meyer did call it 'fractioning
> > > > water' as in cracking the water molecule to release the hydrogen and
> > > > oxygen, which was to be combusted in the engine. Meyer claims to
> have
> > > > used a frequency.
> > > >
> > > > Whereas Keely claimed that by instantaneously disrupting the
> molecule,
> > > > it would produce a tremendous explosion using the 42.8kcps...other
> > > > frequencies for triple dissociation were 610, 610 and 12kcps.
> > > >
> > > > I still find it encouragingly synchronistic and supportive that the
> > > > late Henry (Andrija) Puharich found that the optimum dissociation
> > > > frequency for water was 600cps which he happened to stumble upon
> while
> > > > looking for a way to remove gases from the blood. When we had him in
> > > > Dallas, I told him about Keely's research with water dissociation and
> > > > named those frequencies, he'd never heard that before, so he was
> > > > surprised also.
> > > >
> > > > Keely claimed that using 3 drops of water, exploded in a spherical
> > > > chamber he produced a pressure of 29,000 psi.
> > > >
> > > > As I recall, air pressure at sea level is 14.7 psi. I've worked
> around
> > > > 150 psi air pressures and that was enough for me, so like the term
> > > > billion in money, I have a problem fathoming even 1000 psi.
> > > >
> > > > I looked through the about 357 patents at;
> > > >
> > > > http://www.uspto.gov (under patent search)
> > > >
> > > > and could not locate using meyer+engine+water
> > > >
> > > > Just wanted to pull up the details of his claims and technique but
> > > > guess not today...it goes back to 76 so maybe I missed it.
> > > >
> > > > I was thinking he used high voltage AC discharge at one or more
> > > > frequencies that he claimed cracked the water molecule, but can't
> > > > prove it without the patent...
> > > >
> > > > ---NickandSim@aol.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > To Bill,
> > > > > You are confusing the keely dissociation frequency with
> > > > the stan
> > > > > meyer hv water splitter. The keely frequency is the frequency for
> > > > the
> > > > > ultrasonic dissociation of water into etheric force (allegedly)
> > > > > The stan meyer device is a type of electrolytic cell to break down
> > > > water with
> > > > > more than %100 efficiency (allegedly)
> > > > >
> > > > > Nick Field
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________
> > > > DO YOU YAHOO!?
> > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > > > with the body text: leave Keelynet
> > > > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > > > http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > > with the body text: leave Keelynet
> > > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > > http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@dallastexas.net>
> > with the body text: leave Keelynet
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://dallastexas.net/keelynet/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------