Re: On NASA, Podletnekov & diamagnetism

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sun, 17 May 1998 00:47:41 -0500

Hi Folks!

I sent the following to John Schnurer who duplicated
and EXCEEDED the results of the Podletnekov
experiment, yielding a reliable 5% weight loss as
opposed to the 2% of the Tampere experiment.

If NASA must fund this, let them do it with John
Schnurere, as he is one of the most creative guys
I've been fortunate enough to email with.
------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Question about your weight loss experiment
Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 11:35:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Schnurer <herman@antioch-college.edu>
To: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>
CC: John Schnurer <herman@college.antioch-college.edu>

See notes;

On Sat, 16 May 1998, Jerry W. Decker wrote:

> Hi John!
>
> Could you confirm or deny something for me from your
> experiment with the superconducting weight loss?
>
> The report I saw on your experiment and the
> Podletnekov one showed a weight loss ABOVE the
> stimulated superconducting material.
>
> In your experiment, did you measure any weight
> loss UNDER the ring?
>

Eugene did careful measures under the assembly he had
and there was no change, plus or minus, weight wise.

Our set up was a little different... BUT: If there
were an equal and opposite under-the-superconductor
effect then we would have either seen no effect,
or a severly attenuated effect.

All evidence indicates there is no change under the rig.

This question has been asked many times.

> I remember you said something about needing some
> additional bucks to do more tests....Thanks.
> --

I am so far in hock for back rent on the dewar it
would take literally thousands to even get back to
baseline.
J
----------------------------------
Though John does not address this nor does
Podletnekov, the weight that is apparently 'lost'
in the column above the superconductor, I think
is actually distributed BACK THROUGH the support
and into the table, so it could never provide
TRUE, standalone flight of a device...

See; http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/fingrav.htm

http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/agup0997.htm

http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/scwheel.htm

and more at; http://www.keelynet.com/gravity.htm

If they ever get through screwing around, I
absolutely am convinced that I and some
of my contacts could produce a controllable
gravity reduction technology that could be
replicated and improved on, but it won't happen
unless we fund ourselves. The science church in
this country doesn't recognize mavericks...screw'em,
we'll one day ram it down their collective throats.

--                Jerry W. Decker  /   jdecker@keelynet.com          http://keelynet.com   /  "From an Art to a Science"       Voice : (214) 324-8741   /   FAX :  (214) 324-3501   KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187