Roger Natanaelsson wrote:
> Dave wrote:
> > As you can see, asking the question, "What is magnetism?" is a subject
> > that requires much more study.
>
> Gianni Dotto have made some distinctions about magnetism:
>
> No. 1 - PERMANENT MAGNET. If we try to magnetize a bar of copper, we
> will never succeed because in the copper the outer orbit of the
> electrons increases in the kinetic energy without shifting electrons
> from one orbit to another. The same effect we will obtain if we try to
> magnetize a bar of nickel.Now let's take a copper-nickel alloy, such as
> alnickel, and expose it to the EMF of a high inductive coil.
> The directional spinning of the electrons orbit in the nickel does not
> change, but the orbital spinning of the electrons in the copper reverses
> its direction. Result: Any atom of nickel. strongly attracts an atom of
> copper, creating a bipole. The energy summation of all bipoles combined
> creates one of the strongest permanent magnets on the market - alnickel
> V. Every permanent magnet then must be composed of at least two
> different atoms, one of which is willing to change the orbital spinning
> direction of the electrons. This type of permanent magnet is not
> recommended for,any therapeutic purpose for the human body.
>
> No. 2 - ELECTROMAGNET. This type of magnetic field obeys the third
> Newtonian law of motion (to every action there is always an equal and
> opposite reaction).If an iron bar is inserted in the center of an
> inductive coil, every electron traveling along the coil wire forces one
> electron in the iron bar to travel in the opposite direction. This type
> of magnetic field is not recommended for any therapeutic purposes. On
> the contrary, it has been proved to be detrimental even in mice tests.
> Electrons flowing along the magnetic coil will shift electrons from one
> part of the body to another. In this process RNA type viruses of
> negative polarity will be shifted from diseased cells to healthy cells
> in the same fashion as the electrons. Furthermore, the shifting of
> electrons deprives the healthy cells ot the energy necessary to support
> life and will produce severe side effects of dizziness that will last
> for several days there after.
>
> No. 3 - ELECTROSTATIC attraction. When we rub a bar of hard rubber or a
> bar of amber one acquires electrons in excess and the other loses
> electrons from the outer shell orbit. Consequently, one will attract
> particles rich in electrons, the other will attract particles poor of
> electrons. This type of magnetic attraction is not recommended because
> this one will weaken the energy of cells, the other increase the
> negative potential of the skin of the cancer cell, thus facilitating the
> growth of the cancer.
>
> No.4 - THERMOMAGNETIC field.The thermomagnetic field is the product of
> the Thompson-Peltier effects combined, known in physics as the Seebeck
> effect.The thermomagnetic field is responsible for the general
> gravitation system: heat (sun) attracts cool (planet) and vice versa.
> This type of magnetic field is the only type of energy proven to be
> beneficial to animals and humans. Since humans for millions of years
> have lived in this constant magnetic or gravitational field, the body
> has become very sensitive to any variation.
>
> Why is magnet by thermo different from magnet by electricity,
> is the flow different- what flow ?