Re: MRA

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sat, 28 Mar 1998 01:21:36 -0600

Hi Norm et al!

Thanks for that excellent additional detail on the MRA....you know, I think
we all realize it inherently, but components that are supposed to be THE
SAME off the shelf are NOT.

There are of course various conversations going on with various
researchers, sometimes with interesting tidbits...here is a recent comment
from one which might yet yield a PoP model;

> As far as what the old man told you concerning the characteristics
> of semiconductors I can tell you that they do exhibit some peculiar
> characteristics. * and I found that only one version of what I thought
> was a generic audio amp works the way that I want it to. * will
> verify that the "-1" Radio Shack version of the LM 386 op amp
> works in the circuitry while the Jameco "-3" version does not.
> They are supposed to be interchangable.

He is referring to a new design which at this point appears to produce
overunity. I am hoping it is true but history does not bespeak well of
overunity or free energy claims.

He also refers to comments from yet another currently private inventor who
says perhaps 1 in 50 so-called identical transistors will have the
necessary operational characsteristics.....this just scares the heck out of
me, UNLESS those parameters and the circuit the components work in would be
shared. At least he should point out some clues as to what we should
looking for. I've been on him now for nearly a year trying to at least get
tidbits as to how. He seems to agree that the secret of his particular
circuit might die with him or his partner but is yet unwilling to share it
with the world, whether by outright sale, plans or kits....

You and I both have heard Tom talk about 'negative resistors' that when
used in an oscillator or amplifier will produce free energy. I have no
solid clue as to what the composition or parameters of such a device would
be. Though the non-inductive moebius resistor patented by NASA in 1964,
might be one approach.

The recent discussion on vortex of tornados and 'negative viscosity' as the
key to WHY they continue to drive themselves with ever more power,
eventually building up to a peak, sustaining itself for a short period,
then dissipating back to ambience.

Hmmmm, negative resistance.....rather than resisting the flow of current,
it ATTRACTS IT because it has NO or rather LESS than NO???? resistance.

A kind of a well, a 'hole in the aether', much deeper than normal mass
'holes' associated with all matter and into which aether and gravity
normally flows at a rate determined by their mass/density.

Gunn Diodes?? Tunneling effect? Quantum wells?? Cold Cathode vacuum
tubes serving as ultra high farad capacitors???