Re: Thoughts from my little warped mind

Billy M. Williams ( (no email) )
Fri, 20 Mar 1998 23:04:51 -0500

I dunno about a holographic universe, but I do subscribe to the theory of
every point in the universe having it's own vibrational frequency. Build a
device that can connect your vibrational frequency to another points
vibrational frequency in spacetime and I bet a tear or rift would open up.
Instant travel between points, sortof a dimensional key as it were.
Hmmm....what if every planet, etc in the universe has it's own musical
tones??
Billy M. Williams

==============================================
This is the testimony of all that I have
seen, and all I have learned...For this
is the Book of the Dead, the Book of the
Black Earth, that I have writ down at the
peril of my life.

--Abdul Alhazred

----------
> From: Hexslinger <hexslngr@internet-frontier.net>
> To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
> Subject: Re: Thoughts from my little warped mind
> Date: Friday, March 20, 1998 10:43 PM
>
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 1998, Matthew Redmond wrote:
>
> > Every point in the universe has its own separate frequency.
>
> This is basically in line with the holographic universe ideal -- all
> points in the universe consist of various frequencies (not just one) -
> whose collisions produce the aether itself in all its dimensionality.
> By interfering with the aether, one should theoretically be able to
affect
> the hologram as well such that you can blink from one part of the
hologram
> to the next. I really need to get some further information on holography
> so I can draft a short essay on this topic -- it's really worth the
> investigation if anybody's got the time or the money to do it, but it's
> kinda pointless unless I were to arrange some notes containing what
little
> is known about holography and how it can be adapted/grafted to physics as
> we know it.
>
> > As to faster than light travel, I still don't know. They did a
> > calculation on the warp field, they found that the amount of
> > matter/antimatter in the universe isn't enough to form one, or sustain
it.
> > Damn shame though, I was really looking forward to working in
engineering.
>
> "warp fields"? What the hell are you talking about? Please tell me you're
> not dragging pop-science into this discussion... you're not, are you? :)
>
>