Re: Push Gravity

Jim Shaffer, Jr. ( (no email) )
Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:32:28 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: JNaudin509: "About the Johnson's motor"
Next message: Grant Fraser: "Re: Mambo Chicken book"
Maybe in reply to: Jerry W. Decker: "Push Gravity"
Next in thread: Jerry W. Decker: "Re: Push Gravity"

Here's something that's been bugging me for a while, but I don't have time
to look for the answer. We all know that Einstein got rid of the
cosmological constant because there was no evidence for it, but if that's
the case, why did he put it in in the first place? What was his original
concept? This is a more interesting puzzle, in my opinion, than the
potential fields in Maxwell's equations, because Maxwell wasn't the one who
took the potentials out. But Einstein must have had a good reason, at the
time, for putting the cosmological constant in.

--"It'll be just like 'The Wonder Years', only with giant snakes!" --H:TLJ, Yes Virginia, There Is a Hercules

Previous message: JNaudin509: "About the Johnson's motor"
Next message: Grant Fraser: "Re: Mambo Chicken book"
Maybe in reply to: Jerry W. Decker: "Push Gravity"
Next in thread: Jerry W. Decker: "Re: Push Gravity"