> It would save everyones time if we knew who to avoid (based on years of
> exposure with nothing to prove it), who is new to the field (everyone
> gets a shot), who is offering information as opposed to a solid product.
Normally I'd smack you for an idea like this <g>, but things are different
here. Normally you'd want to keep an open mind - as much as humanly
possible... but considering that some people keep their mind so open that
their brains fall out, perhaps providing a "who's who" in the field would
be useful. I'm just hoping we can all show some respect and restraint -
don't be quick to judge someone too harshly (or too seriously).
Everything wiht a grain of salt - and like that.