v/r Ken Carrigan
>This is good thinking. For those familiar with geobiology
>(baubiology/bioconstruction) there is another positive aspect to DC; it
>is much friendlier to biological systems. Certain pulsed fields may be
>very beneficial to health, however 60 Hz is absolutly not.
>Mathias
60Hz has not been determined to cause any health affects but sure
has been a lot of studies. Same with cellphones, radar guns, and
any RF source that we spend hours or more arounds per day. I'll
bet the same would go for DC - it's just we don't have a big source
that we can sleep with or work with daily.