Re: How about Mechanical Storage / Impulse Wave?
Kenneth Carrigan ( (no email) )
Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:39:53 -0500
Shane,
>He claims impulse force can yield input power squared. The relationship
>between impulse forces is not [F1: F2] but [F1 : F2]^2. F1 is input
>power in the form of an 'impulse wave'. F2 is the resistive force of
>the mechanism. As I read it, F1 must be greater than F2 for overunity?
>
>Impulse force, F1, can be increased by either weight, speed or both.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/3664/kinetic.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/3664/kinexp.html
>
>He claims to have a device that produces up to %1000 eff.
>
>
>Your thoughts?
One thing he forgot was to account for the moment of interia energy loss
of the rotor where the wire/rope must turn it. This rotor also has mass
and must take energy away from the source to rotate it. As noted...
the lift 'should' have been higher but wasn't. No overunity since lift was
'less' than it should have been. Suggest he goes back to some
physics books where he can fill in the missing energy sink.
v/r Ken Carrigan