Re: Egyptian Technology

Bradley Scott ( bscott@metz.une.edu.au )
Tue, 10 Feb 1998 07:43:48 +1100

At 12:13 AM 09-02-98 -3, you wrote:
>> >
>> > Calling the magnetic potential a scalar is indeed wrong. It's a vector.
>> > The electric potential is a scalar though.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Hey you, don't help them to bury the light.
>> > --Pink Floyd
>> I thought any phase cancelling waves, whatever their nature, partially
>> or near perfectly cancelling each other all form a scalar potential(s)?
>>
>
>What happens on the space where this two waves cancels ?
>
>I guess the space is stressed the same way as two opposing forces
>at the same point on a solid object.
>
>What is the limit of this stress ? I mean if we have two very strong
>phase cancelling waves applied to a given little space ?
>
>Marcelo
>

Hi Marcela and everyone,

I thought it useful to post an email that I received from Tom Bearden,
which covers alot of his most recent thinking. I think it's excellent and
could contribute to the current discussion. I feel that people need to
master what Tom's is putting together here before they can approach ou/fe
in a scientific, rigious manner. It was addressed to Jerry Decker, but it
was too big to be accepted by the mailer, so I have zipped the message and
attached it.

Cheers,

Brad

Attachment Converted: "E:\INTERNET\eudora\Attach\keely.zip"

Bradley Scott
Saltbush Software
Agricultural Business Research Institute
University of New England, NSW
Australia, 2350.

Ph: +61 2 6773 3555
email: bscott@metz.une.edu.au.
Received: from ???@??? Mon Feb 09 15:00:37 1998
X-Persona: <IADFW Account>
Return-Path: <KeelyNet-L-return-750-danyork=iadfw.net@lists.kz>
Received: from lists.kz from [207.180.91.8] by mail.airmail.net
(/\##/\ Smail3.1.30.16 #30.237) with smtp for <danyork@iadfw.net>
id <m0y20Gy-000CMEB@mail.airmail.net> Mon, 9 Feb 98 14:57:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 28795 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 1998 21:10:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact KeelyNet-L-help@lists.kz; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Delivered-To: mailing list KeelyNet-L@lists.kz
Received: (qmail 28776 invoked from network); 9 Feb 1998 21:10:01 -0000
Received: from smtp1.erols.com (207.172.3.234)
by mail.starfire.douglas.ma.us with SMTP; 9 Feb 1998 21:10:01 -0000
Received: from cyborg (207-172-110-209.s18.as4.frd.erols.com [207.172.110.209])
by smtp1.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA28444
for <KeelyNet-L@lists.kz> Mon, 9 Feb 1998 16:01:46 -0500 (EST)
From: "Ken Carrigan" <carrk@erols.com>
To: <KeelyNet-L@lists.kz>
Subject: Regarding Sonoluminescence
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 1998 15:57:19 -0500
Message-ID: <01bd359d$4fbf0be0$LocalHost@cyborg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3

Jer et all,

Micro-cavitation fusion, or luke-warm fusion - Nobody knows WHY cold
nuclear fusion works, or even if it does because conventional theory
does not cover it, and the ones invented to explain it doesn't work.

Cavitation is when you get bubbles forming in a violently stirred liquid.
This effect occurs around submarine propellors at depths of about
300ft or lower and at pressures of 10atms. It can also me produced
at 1atms, by pushing a ultrasound frequency into a sealed container of
liquid. Water is best. This has been know for ages, since 1952. What
was discovered in 1990's is that these bubbles glow in the dark. Dimly
blue. Each bubble is aprox 1 to 3 microns in diameter, it depends on
the wavelength. It turns out that the bubbles glow because the energys
involved produce a plasma inside as they collapse. One that is at
temp/pressures equal or greater to that at the core of the sun!

What I'm going to attempt is to replicate the following experiment where
one man made a small set-up using a glass tube, and a ultrasound
transducer. The end cap was positively charged to attract free electrons.
His initial run with plain water heated it no more than expected, ie
slightly
less energy out than in. The next run used heavy water, plus dissolved
deuterium gas and was a little more dramatic.
His equipment was activated in one second bursts, in case of radiation
production. In aprox 1/10 of a second enough energy was liberated to
vapourise his water, causing a large steam explostion. Also sufficent
light to blind him temporally.
He stated that there was no detectable radiation. Upon later thought he
theorised that the oxygen atoms where acting as neutron absorbers,
and the surrounding water coped with the gamma.

He had suggested that a modified internal combustion engine would
be the next step - or ultimate demonstration. The air intake would
convert to a water intake, with the fuel injector acting as a gasious
deuterium injector. The spark-plug would be replaced with an
ultra-sound transducer. Basically a fusion powered steam engine.

v/r Ken Carrigan