Re: Earth Energy Taps

Bruce A. Perreault ( (no email) )
Mon, 26 Jan 1998 08:04:37 -0500

Jerry W. Decker wrote:
>
> Hi Ken et al!
>
> Agreed.
>
> I loved your Freudian slip with this quote;
> > This is the proper way research projects should go... theory,
> > HYPNOSIS, experiment and results - then loop back around for
> > revisions.
>
> Precisely, HYPNOSIS, like the chickens hypnotized by the snake, we let
> ourselves get drawn by claims and cons; down into confusion until our
> time, efforts and in some cases, finances are beyond recovery.

Perreault writes:

I do not like being called a "CON."

>
> NO MORE !!! FOCUS! Take a stand and by god stick with it!
>
> Ok, I hesitated posting what some of us are planning until I could get
> these files posted, but they are now done.
>
> Check out; http://keelynet.com/energy/aethrtap.htm
> http://keelynet.com/energy/prentice.htm

>
> No one, to my knowledge has EVER tried to duplicate the Prentice patent.
> He clearly tells you his experiments and his results, claiming you could
> create a type of circulating earth current that could power a load.

Perreault writes:

This is baby stuff, it is a frequency up converter, that's all...

>
> Remember Nathan Stubblefield....in his case, he buried dissimilar metal
> plates, facing each other, separated by distance. I am unclear at this
> moment if he strung connecting insulating wires over the distance,
> possibly not, though Prentice says you must (using his system).

Perreault writes:

This is a mere battery system!

>
> A few of us will do this project this summer. Notice he says you need a
> high voltage source to initialize the circulating current. We have
> several people in our Roundtable who have large areas of land that would
> let us do either 1/2 mile or 1 mile....we will videotape it and report
> fully on our failure...woops, damned hypnosis, SUCCESS!!!
>
> Onward and upward, we have work to do before the next millenium.

Perreault writes:

You mean maddness...

-ISIS