Lots of thing need to be told first. Is it an oscope that the frequency
was obtained by? How could you tell in was 3X freq? What was
the amplitude output/input - was it phase locked - as if not, it would
look like 3X. There is a point when inductors start to look like capacitors
and this is the SRF or Self Resonate Frequency. Also, there are many
different ferrites (the lower the 'u' the higher the frequency - normally).
Ferrite does have hysteresis where mixing of frequencies can happen. If
there is phase lag/lead - around the SRF usually, then you could generate
harmonics (3rd being the strongest with symetrical quadrature waveforms).
The real question is - what are you trying to do - or prove?
>> Hmm... and how strong would a magnetic field have to be at a given
>> resonance frequency in order to cause an element to break down into it's
>> component parts, and is this 'threshold value' a constant across all
>> elements (and can it be augmented by external force somehow)?
>>
>What is the strongest eletromagnetic force easilly obtainable ?
NMR generates very very intense H-Fields where water molecules are
aligned - they do not break appart. This magnetic field can be as high
as 10 Telsa. Now magnitude is not final answer. As with Dr. Becker,
uA of current caused differentiation where 100's of uA to mA did nothing.
Also, in any resonate structure, it is the frequency(s) and not so much
the amplitude that can shatter materials. When circuits are in the
resonate mode, generally they can be concidered as non linear. Rife
frequencies, for instance, are known to generate evanescent modes
of living cells - where sub resonate frequencies exist for objects. But
that is another topic totally in and of itself. There is a Rife List to
discuss
this - and list threads.
Laser Listener
>Does anyone know how high of a frequency range that could be achieved?
>Now, how do you suspend/support the mass under test? Rubber bands?
>Any Yeh or Nay on this concept?
The problem with is the doppler effect with the laser light - this is what
is mixed with the coherent light to achieve the doppler frequency. It
is the reflected amplitude and collection that is the problem. One would
fry any material in order to get a good signal back. So yes, it is signal
to noise - or signal to fry ratio.
v/r Ken Carrigan