You wrote;
> Just received your latest apology.
Whaddaya mean LATEST apology....
Just kidding....believe me, when I hit the send key after reworking that
original message a few times, I realized I SHOULD have gone to IBM and
reread the blasted patent...then when I did, I was rushing like hell to
send it before you responded...<g>....
Hey, live and learn...onward and upward....well, Perrault old fellow, you
taught me something, I would never have thought Papp used anything
radioactive in his engine....casts an entirely new light on it.
What do you think about this Searl engine story? Do you know of any odd,
maybe generally unknown property of gasoline that would get some reaction
in the presence of radioactive materials??? I've never really looked
into it because IMHO, I still don't think zpe/aether REQUIRES
radioactivity to be tapped...though I can see how, being on the outbound
cycle of creation...<g>...it would be closer to aether....
Interesting, that raises yet another question....specifically, explosive
forces as opposed to IMPLOSIVE forces.....one destroys to produce energy,
the other produces energy and creates at the same time. Hmm, have to
dig out my Schauberger and Walter Russell material, been years since
I've seriously read any of it. But Schauberger claimed the vortex used
implosive forces that could be tapped for all kinds of things, including
health (Rudolph Steiner also).
-- Jerry W. Decker / jdecker@keelynet.com http://keelynet.com / "From an Art to a Science" Voice : (214) 324-8741 / FAX : (214) 324-8741 KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187