Diagnosis lie
Control ploys
Lies & statistics
[Here Allopathy uses diagnosis to 1) hide the ineffectiveness of vaccination, eg polio, smallpox 1 2, whooping cough. 2). Hide vaccine mercury injuries under autism, and Autism increase due to change in diagnosis 3.) Hide vaccine and drug injuries under meningitis, Aplastic Anaemia. 4). Hide vaccine/drug deaths under SIDS, Shaken Baby Syndrome, Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy or Spanish Flu 5). Make up a new name to create a market for drugs eg al ADHD, Compulsive Shopping Disorder or Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder. 6). Redefine a condition. eg. Encephalopathy, to make it easier for compensation to be denied to vaccine injured children. 7). Suppress recovering mind control victim under Paranoid schizophrenia and their memories under False Memory Syndrome 8). Hide chemical injuries under Polio, Toxic Oil Syndrome, Legionnaires Disease and BSE & CJD. 9). Not to forget creating the cholesterol myth to sell Statins, HIV myth and HIV test fraud to sell AIDS drugs, and other fraudulent Medical tests 10). Hide amalgam and aluminium poisoning under 'Alzheimer’s' 11.) AZT deaths under 'AIDS' 12). Toxic air under 'flu', and so on.]
See:
Psychiatry quotes
[2006] Reducing rape with an eraser By Judith
Reisman
Virus hunters
See:
'Experts' deny
Underlying conditions
Diagnosis
Coincidence
Check out our Disease Mongering Engine where you can instantly generate your
own fictitious diseases and disorders!
http://www.naturalnews.com/disease-mongering-engine.asp
Serious problems such as depression are overlooked as people are diagnosed
with unproven "mental illnesses" such as Compulsive Shopping Disorder or
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder."---Coalition for Informed Patients and Doctors
"Medical research has made such progress, that there are practically no healthy people any more." – Aldous Huxley.
Coalition for Informed Patients and Doctors
They Say You're Crazy: How the World's Most Powerful Psychiatrists Decide Who's Normal by Paula Caplan
[2009 Nov] A Nun speaks out on the H1N1
Pandemic: "The WHO changed the official definition of a pandemic" Interview with
Sister Dr. Teresa Forcades . An articulate and authoritative statement by Gaspar
Hernández Last May, WHO changed the official definition of a pandemic
-- it changed from a logical definition (a pandemic is an infection of global
proportions and with a high mortality) to an illogical definition (a pandemic is
an infection of global proportions). Under the new definition of
"pandemic", the annual [seasonal] flu more than meets the requirements to be
one. Are we going to declare a world health alert every fall? Besides absurdity
from the scientific standpoint, this has serious financial and policy
consequences.
.....In 2007, WHO adopted a regulation that in case of a pandemic, WHO can
legally bind member countries to vaccinate all or part of their population. The
governments of these countries would be obliged then to impose fines or other
penalties for individuals who refuse to be vaccinated.
A more blatant example of this reclassification ploy is the label of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). As Neil Miller's book demonstrates, 70 percent of SIDS cases have been shown to follow pertussis vaccination within three weeks A number of the new vaccines are also associated with sudden infant death. In order to avoid admitting that the sudden stoppage of breathing by a baby within hours to weeks of these vaccines was due to the vaccines, the vaccine defender merely created a new disease and gave it the incredible name of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), which is like naming it the "Baby Mysteriously Die of Anything but a Vaccine Injury Syndrome" (BMDAVIS). Vaccine Safety Manual by Neil Z. Miller. Preface
Pediatric bipolar disorder: An object of study in the creation of an illness,
by David Healy and Joanna Le Noury, International Journal of Risk & Safety in
Medicine, 19 (2007) 209–221.
As outlined above, a number of forces appear to have swept aside traditional
academic skepticism with the result that an increasing
number of children and infants are being put on cocktails of potent
drugs without any evidence of benefit.
.........If the process outlined here was one that
could reasonably be expected to lead to benefits it could regarded
as therapeutic. But given that there is no evidence for benefit and
abundant prima facie evidence that giving the drugs in
question to vulnerable subjects in such quantities cannot but produce consequent
difficulties for many of these minors, one has to wonder whether we are
not witnessing instead a variation on Munchausen’s
syndrome, where some significant other wants the individual to be ill and these
significant others derive some gain from these proxy illnesses.
To further increase profit, drug companies invent disease and subsequently,
offer a solution. Herein lies the origin of deadly health myths. Such myths
include, but are surely not limited to, that of high cholesterol being the
culprit of heart disease, insulin being the only treatment for diabetics and
that AIDS, rather than starvation, is killing Africans. Through "junk science"
and "ghost writing," the general public and some of the world's most respected
health experts have fallen victim to these myths.
Inventing disease is not a "far
out" conspiracy theory. It is a simple matter of finding ailments that naturally
occur due to poor lifestyle habits and labeling them as a disease. Once
"big-pharma" steals jurisdiction over the general public's common sense, they
convince them of the necessity of their drugs. [2006]
Interview of Shane Ellison
author of Health Myths Exposed
"The British Medical Journal ran a very revealing article recently, entitled Selling Sickness. In it, the authors stated:
“Pharmaceutical companies are actively involved in sponsoring the definition of diseases and promoting them to both prescribers and consumers. The social construction of illness is being replaced by the corporate construction of disease. Although some sponsored professionals or consumers may act independently and all concerned may have honourable motives, in many cases the formula is the same: groups and/or campaigns are orchestrated, funded, and facilitated by corporate interests, often via their public relations and marketing infrastructure. A key strategy of the alliances is to target the news media with stories designed to create fears about the condition or disease and draw attention to the latest treatment. Company sponsored advisory boards supply the ‘independent experts’ for these stories, consumer groups provide the ‘victims’ and public relations companies provide media outlets with the positive spin about the latest ‘breakthrough’ medications.” (Ray Moynihan, Iona Heath, David Henry, 'Selling Sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease-mongering', British Medical Journal online, BMJ, 13th April 2002 )--Steve Ransom
"Another problem of the AIDS epidemiology is the following: By now about 30 afflictions all of which were known before, are being renamed to AIDS in the presence of a positive HIV-test. This also is not an increase of diseases of course --but just a redefinition. This circular definition HIV+/TB = AIDS and HIV-/TB = TB makes the correlation HIV-AIDS appear 100%. For example, a patient who suffers from TB and who is also HIV-positive is an AIDS patient today, and a woman who suffers from cervical carcinoma is an AIDS patient today, and a patient with a lymphoma is today not a lymphoma patient but also an AIDS patient if he has antibodies against HIV. " ---- Claus Köhnlein (BSE/AIDS/Hepatitis C Infectious or Intoxication Diseases?)
"For many years, they were able to shut-up and quietly discard their programmed multiples by labelling them Paranoid schizophrenics.... Establishment shrinks helped cover up the programmed multiplicity for decades by labelling the programmed-multiple slaves "paranoid schizophrenics".---Fritz Springmeier
Case no. 9 was a middle-aged woman whose case was similar to case no. 5. She was also treated with Brufen. She also died. The medical profession recognised this as the cause of the aplastic anaemia but death was put down to an accidental overdose of tablets. BLOOD DISORDERS AND CANCERS RESULTING FROM EXPOSURE TO DRUGS, CHEMICALS AND RADIATION by Edward Priestley
"Furthermore, much depends on how statistics are gathered. Until recently most autopsies on infants were carried out in a haphazard fashion. Often, no autopsies were performed. Now, in most parts of the western world, strict criteria are applied and autopsies performed by specialist teams. Many cases that previously would be considered as qualifying for the diagnosis of SIDS are now excluded. This artificially reduces the incidence compared to pre-autopsy and specialised consideration times. To accurately follow recent trends one needs to look at the overall infant mortality rate. This is the bottom line and cannot be easily manipulated."--Dr Kalokerinos MD (Medical Pioneer of the 20th century p178)