Vaccine law
Litigation
Change/make the laws
| Encephalopathy redefinition | Vaccine law quotes | Vaccine litigation & VICP |
"The case commenced in October 1987 in front of Lord Justice
Stuart-Smith at the High Court. I was alarmed to discover that it was the Judge who
decided which case he wanted to hear and which witnesses he would allow to be heard and
that there would be a moratorium on all other Legal Aid Certificates. Lord Justice
Stuart-Smith .....found that the Plaintiff had
failed to show on the balance of probabilities that the vaccine could have caused
permanent brain damage in young children. ..... His Lordship’s decision did not surprise me and others
because he had been deprived of hearing vital evidence from the parents of vaccine damaged
children, their medical experts, independent medical experts from the Vaccine Damaged
Tribunals and reports from the Yellow Card system. Before the case commenced I wrote to
the Lord Chancellor and the Master of the Rolls saying that the case had been chosen to
fail, they replied saying they could intervene. I also wrote to the Learned Clerk to
the Lord Stuart-Smith about the witnesses to be called, he replied saying that this was up
to the Counsel in the case.
There is little doubt the Loveday v Renton case left a lot to be
desired in the interests of natural justice. When was the Loveday case selected when Miss
Loveday had been refused Payment under the Act and had previously been to the court of
appeal on two occasions which had refused her applications. There were hundreds of cases
which could have been selected which had been awarded the Payment and where evidence could
have been called by medical experts."---Wm. H Wain BEM
USA:
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Vaccine Injury Table http://www.hrsa.dhhs.gov/bhpr/vicp/table.htm#
Vaccine law http://www.sarasotalaw.com/vaccine/
How the Law restricts payments (examples)
The Court of Federal Claims http://www.law.gwu.edu/fedcl/ http://www.ogc.doc.gov/fedcl/ http://www.ogc.doc.gov/fedcl/cofc.html
"In the end, the government turned Andrew down for compensation. There would be no money to help us care for our son. The Special Master told us that if we had applied for compensation a year earlier, she would have found in our favor but because of the TABLE CHANGE there was nothing she could do but find in favor of the government. "---Michelle Clements
Sarah Frances Corzine----Medical officials ruled it as SIDS but my husband, our family, our friends and our church family believe otherwise http://home.fuse.net/natalie/ http://www.ties.org/sarah/
Vaccine law becomes his life mission
Over 80% damaged, UK, to get compensation: http://dkb.sm.ic.ac.uk/genprac/benefit/lgh227.htm