David Kirby
Mercury
Web: http://www.evidenceofharm.com http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby
[2009 Sept] David Kirby: New Study: Hepatitis B Vaccine Triples the Risk of Autism in Infant Boys
[2009 may] Discover Magazine Ignores Much of Vaccine-Autism Story David Kirby
[2009 Feb] Vaccine Court: Autism Debate Continues By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. & David Kirby
[2009 Feb] Vaccine Court: Hepatitis B Shot Caused MS By David Kirby
[2008 Dec] David Kirby on Autism and the Military: One Very Brave Captain
Former UK Science Chief -- Vaccines Cause Autism: "What More Evidence is Needed?" "I have always thought since I first heard about the Somali children that this really proves the causal role of vaccines. The Amish children who have no vaccines have no autistic-like disorders and the Somali children who are newly exposed to aggressive vaccine programmes have exceptionally high levels! What more evidence is needed?"
[2008] Key realities about autism, vaccines, vaccine-injury compensation, Thimerosal, and autism-related research----Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D & P.G. King PhD.
[June 20 2008] CDC: Vaccine Study Design "Uninformative and Potentially Misleading" by David Kirby
[June 2008] CDC Has Lost Control of the Autism Argument by David Kirby
BESTSELLING AMERICAN AUTHOR DAVID KIRBY TO VISIT UK IN JUNE
[Feb 2008] The Vaccine-Autism Court Document Every American Should Read by David Kirby
Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What?
After years of insisting there is no evidence to link vaccines with the
onset of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the US government has quietly conceded
a vaccine-autism case in the Court of Federal Claims.
......In its written concession, the government said
the child had a pre-existing mitochondrial disorder that was "aggravated" by her
shots, and which ultimately resulted in an ASD diagnosis.
"The vaccinations received on July 19, 2000, significantly aggravated an
underlying mitochondrial disorder," the concession says, "which predisposed her
to deficits in cellular energy metabolism, and manifested as a regressive
encephalopathy with features of ASD."
Doctors Against Research? By David Kirby on the
Huffington Post blog.
In other words, Congress wants to study thimerosal -- the mercury
containing vaccine preservative and possible contributor to some autism
cases -- and that makes the powerful AAP very, very unhappy.
"Any bill that contains any questions about vaccines, we are not going to
endorse," one lobbyist informed the group. "There is absolutely no link
between thimerosal and autism. Period. To endorse the bill implies that
this is an open question, and it is not." "The
bottom line," the lobbyist continued, to stunned silence, "is that we
don't want to look into this. It is inappropriate to waste precious
research dollars on something that we know will be disproved."
Evidence of Harm Author David Kirby Speaks & discussion forum
An Evidence of Harm email discussion list has been created in response to the growing interest in the book and the issues it chronicles. Now over 1,100 subscribers. Here is how to subscribe (no cost): EOHarm-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Conference Presentations: David Kirby
The Messenger Part 1 (David Kirby talks about the recent developments in the
Autism vaccine connection)
The Messenger Part 2 (David Kirby talks about the recent developments in the
Autism vaccine connection)
Book:
[Feb 2005]
"EVIDENCE OF HARM" by New York Times writer David
Kirby
Quotes
[June
20 2008] CDC: Vaccine Study Design "Uninformative and Potentially Misleading" by
David Kirby CDC officials conducted at least five separate analyses
of the data over a four-year period from 1999-2003. The first analysis showed
that children exposed to the most thimerosal by one month of age had extremely
high relative risks for a number of outcomes, compared with children who got
little or no mercury: The relative risk for ADHD was 8.29 times higher; for
autism, it was 7.62 times higher; ADD, 6.38 times higher; tics, 5.65 times; and
speech and language delays were 2.09 more likely among kids who got the most
mercury. Over time, however, all of these risks
declined into statistical insignificance, statistical inconsistency or else
outright oblivion: The relative risk for autism plummeted from 7.62 in the first
analysis, to 2.48 in the second version, to 1.69 in the third round, to 1.52 in
the fourth, and down to nothing at all in the fifth, final, and published
analysis printed in the Journal Pediatrics in November of 2003.
Someone finally did the math and sent the resulting
information to Merck in 1991. They decided to sit on the information and not
share it. It wasn't until 1999, when Congress had ordered the FDA to look at
mercury in medicines, that they finally shared their findings. One small group
at the FDA finally converted the dosages to micrograms. They added it all up and
found out that kids were being slammed with ten, 20, 30, 100 times more mercury
than they were supposed to get, and that it was being injected directly into
their little bodies. I did some of the math the other day and I couldn't believe
my eyes. I actually had to double-check my figures because I couldn't believe
it. If you figure that at two months, a reasonably average baby weighs about ten
pounds. That child should not be exposed to more than 0.5 micrograms of mercury
per day. But on one day, in that second month, a child could get as much as
three shots containing mercury totaling 62.5 micrograms. That's 125 times over
the EPA limit.....When all is said and done and
everything comes out, if it's proven conclusively that mercury in vaccines led
to the autism epidemic in this country, and that Merck had that memo in 1991,
then they are perhaps partly culpable. 1991 was even before Hepatitis B was
added to the vaccination schedule, which obviously added to the mercury load
with which we were injecting our children. It would appear that Merck kept its
mouth shut and a decade of children were exposed to this stuff.
...Let me tell you a little bit about Simpsonwood. The
Simpsonwood Conference Center meeting happened in June of 2000. When the CDC had
looked at the data (right after they said the mercury should come out), they
decided to look further and see if maybe mercury was harmful. How's that for
timing? They had a guy working for them from Belgium, who was just here for a
couple of years, Thomas Verstraeten. They dumped the mercury issue in his lap
and said, "Here, look at the numbers." As it turns out, he was probably a pretty
honorable guy. I think he just wanted to do good science, and he was so far
removed from American politics and pharmaceutical company politics that he could
try. He was honest. He ran the numbers and his first run of the numbers was just
shocking. They showed an elevated rate of autism of 7.62 for kids who received
more than 25 micrograms at one month of age compared to kids who received none.
He sent his findings out, and, not liking the numbers, they had him re-run them.
So he re-stratified the kids and broke them down to various categories and
groups and he managed to get the autism rate down to 2.48. Anything over 2.0 in
a court of law is considered causation. Remember, he started with 7.62. He wrote
an e-mail to his colleagues, a very famous e-mail called, "It Just Won't Go
Away." I almost titled the book that, because the phrase comes up repeatedly.
When you put the findings and the
e-mails together, the situation comes into context, and it becomes very clear
what they were saying, and that they were extremely concerned. An increased
autism risk of 2.48 was clearly unacceptable, so they re-ran the numbers again,
adding more kids in, and got the autism rate down to 1.69. Then they took the
new figure and they had this meeting at Simpsonwood where they invited the FDA,
the drug company people, the pediatrics people, and the government people, and
they had a little powwow. They didn't invite anybody from the public, including
SafeMinds. There was talk of inviting SafeMinds but, in the end, that group
didn't get an invitation. At this meeting Verstraeten spent two days presenting
his findings. There was a discussion and there was a transcriber there.
I sometimes wonder if these people
knew that they were being recorded, because when you read the minutes you just
can't believe the atrocities: they're shocking. I'm sure they didn't think that
the minutes would ever see the light of day. Thank God for the Freedom of
Information Act; America is a great country. Thank God we have a media and thank
God we have parents like the ones in SafeMinds who stayed on top of this.
Otherwise we would never have gotten this information. I'm not even an
investigative reporter. These people just dumped documents on me and I went
through them. That was hard, but it wasn't as hard as what they did, and I
really admire them. Conference
Presentations: David Kirby