Richard L
United Kingdom
6 Posts |
Posted - 11/30/2006 : 11:24:24
|
Vaccination is a very controversial subject, and
it would probably be better for all ( except
those who are injured by vaccines) if it was not
discussed. The GP
Jayne Donegan who provided expert evidence
to a court will be brought before her regulatory
body on December 11 ( see the charges below).
The GMC do not like the medical evidence she
presented to the hearing which in effect
supported two mothers decision not to vaccinate
their children.
The pro vaccine epidemiologists say,Dr Donegan
whose expertise I presume is as a GP and a
clinician, presented "Junk Science" to the
court. There is no doubt there is much junk
science out there, finding the good untainted
scientific studies is the problem. Experts told
us asbestos was safe; cigarette smoking is good
for you and helps you relax; Formula is just as
good as breast milk; Aspirin does not cause
Reyes syndrome in children: Thalidomide is safe,
British beef was safe. Who can forget John
Gummer feeding a beef burger to his daughter.
Least we forget vaccines are "safe" and then
they replace them with an even "safer" vaccine.
How then was it safe in the first place? Many of
the scientific truths of yesteryears seem
ridiculous today. Some time in the future I
believe we will look at vaccinations the way we
look at blood letting or smoking and wonder why
we went along with it so easily. Doctors were
promoting smoking in adverts for Camel cigaretts
only forty years ago
I wish Dr Donegan luck for having the courage to
speak out, unlike the "experts" who are happy to
take money and put their names on the ghost
written articles of the pharmaceutical industry
and have them published as scientific truths.
Its ironic that she is the one accused of
allowing "her deeply held views on the subject
of immunisation to overrule her duty to the
court and to the litigants, and failed to
present an objective, independent and unbiased
view".
Dr Jayne Lavinia Mary DONEGAN
From : 11 December 2006 To : 22 December 2006
Category : Fitness to Practise Hearings
Planned dates: 11 to 22 December 2006
This case will be considered by a Fitness to
Practise Panel applying the General Medical
Council’s Preliminary Proceedings Committee and
Professional Conduct Committee (Procedure) Rules
1988.
The Fitness to Practise Panel will meet at
Regent’s Place, 350 Euston Road, London NW1 3JN
to consider a new case of conduct.
Dr Jayne Lavinia Mary DONEGAN
Registration Number: 2826367
Area of practice: North West London
The Panel will inquire into allegations that
Jayne Lavinia Mary Donegan, a general
practitioner, acted in a way which was
misleading, in direct contravention of her duty
as an expert witness, unprofessional, and likely
to bring the profession into disrepute.
It is alleged that, in relation to two reports
she produced for the Family Division of the High
Court, Dr Donegan gave false and/or misleading
impressions of the research which she relied
upon, allowed her deeply held views on the
subject of immunisation to overrule her duty to
the court and to the litigants, and failed to
present an objective, independent and unbiased
view.
|
Edited by - Richard L on 11/30/2006 12:28:28 |
|