New Zealand: Meningococcal Mass Vaccination
Experiment Scientifically Unjustifiable
New Zealand health authorities have been convinced by Chiron
Corp. to initiate a 250 million $ drive to vaccinate more than a
million children against the MeNZB strain of meningococcal
virus. Chiron Corp. is the pharmaceutical company that has had
its UK manufacturing license
suspended, leading to a shortage of the US supply of flu
vaccine this year.
According to Ron Law, Risk & Policy Analyst, the
evidence indicates that there is no epidemic, and if there
ever was one, it has subsided during the past few years, and he
has the statistics to prove it (in
pdf format).
This is reminiscent of the current US flu "epidemic", where
deaths have been hyped up by the CDC for years and where a
shortage of vaccine, which rightly should be a relief, is widely
promoted as catastrophic by the press. (See
various articles on Chiron and the Flu on Jon Rappoport's
excellent site)
Back to New Zealand. It is a mystery why anyone would
endanger over a million children with injection of an
experimental vaccine and spend hundreds of millions of (NZ)
dollars, when there is no epidemic in sight. Ron Law asks the
questions...
In a related development, New Zealand has apparently
dismantled its Independent Safety Monitoring Board, the one
agency that could get to the bottom of any side effects caused
by the vaccination drive. According to
this article, the British Medical Journal has questioned the
move last July, publishing an open letter by 35 medical doctors
from several countries, who said the Institute had
contributed very valuably to the safety of medicines in New
Zealand and worldwide.
Coincidence?
Meningococcal Disease at 10 to 13 Year Lows
by Ron Law
Risk & Policy Analyst
"Detailed analysis of Ministry of Health data reveals that
notified meningococcal disease cases are at a 10 year low, and
deaths are at a 13 year low," says risk & policy analyst Ron
Law.
It doesn't matter how one looks at the data ... Year-to-date,
rolling 12 month totals, yearly total, adjusted for laboratory
typing, etc, the picture is clearly the same.
[See attachments - available on request from
Beyond Alternative
Solutions]
These are astonishing facts that appear to have been kept out
of sight of politicians and the New Zealand community, and do
not appear to have been included in any epidemiological report
found on the Ministry of Health and ESR websites or in
information received to date under the Official Information Act.
"The question begging an urgent answer is, 'Why?'" asks Ron
Law.
"I'm sure that if the Cabinet had known theses facts it would
not have approved the rollout of the mass vaccination experiment
currently underway; just as the Minister of Health has noted in
Parliament that the Norwegian Government rejected mass
vaccination in 1990/1991," says Ron Law.
This latest evidence further confirms that the Minister of
Health's 7 July statement that there is no evidence of the
disease abating, is patently untrue and should be immediately
retracted.
The ESR itself estimates that between 10% and 26% of cases
notified have been misdiagnosed and are not meningococcal
disease.
Analysis of available data shows that nationally, less than
50% of the total notified cases have been confirmed as being
caused by the MeNZB type meningococcal bacteria. In Auckland,
fewer than 40% have been confirmed as MeNZB-type.
Analysis of Auckland data shows what seem to be significant
problems relating to diagnosis within the Pacific Island
community, (and less so within the Maori community).
This data suggests one of four possible scenarios;
1. There is serious overdiagnosis of
meningococcal disease among Pacific Islanders,
2. Confirmation of diagnosis in Pacific
Islanders is pursued less vigorously than in other ethnic
groups,
3. There is an as yet unidentified
meningococcal-type disease affecting the Pacific Island
community,
4. There is some environmental factor affecting
Pacific Island communities (and to a lesser extent Maori
communities) that is not affecting other groups, especially
outside of Auckland, and especially in 1997.
The meningococcal B strain alleged to be the cause of the
meningococcal epidemic is a mild strain of meningococcal disease
compared to other sub-types, and based on available data, is
responsible for less than 50% of fatalities.
Meningococcal disease researchers have consistently said,
"New Zealand has been experiencing a monoclonal epidemic of
Neisseria meningitidis B:4:P1.7b,4 which has resulted in more
than 5000 cases and over 200 deaths since 1991."
The researchers have presented the exact same statement at
the following conferences in 2004
1. 42nd Annual Meeting of IDSA,September 30–October 3, 2004
–Boston, USA
2. Pediatric Academic Societies Conference, Annual Meeting, May
1–4, 2004, San Francisco,
3. World Health Organisation/UNICEF meeting, 10th March 2004,
Auckland.
"This statement is simply untrue and scientifically
indefensible," says Ron Law.
"If a listed company was to make such false and
misleading messages to the market place trading in its shares
would be halted and there would be an immediate 'please
explain,'" says Ron Law. The numbers appear to be false by
omission and commission and warrant a closer look by the Audit
Office at least.
"The fact that a $250 million mass experiment, that at most
will save one or two lives, has been launched on 1.15 million
otherwise healthy children in New Zealand based on false,
incomplete and misleading information, and courtesy of a
mass-fear campaign is a travesty of good policy making, totally
unethical and warrants a full Royal Commission of Inquiry," says
Ron Law (09-832 4773)
In explaining the rationale to invade Iraq, based on false
evidence that weapons of mass destruction existed, the Telegraph
reported a former secretary to the UK Joint Intelligence
Committee, as saying, "interested policy-makers quickly
learn that intelligence can be used the way a drunk uses a
lamppost - for support rather than illumination"
This would appear to be how the meningococcal disease
statistics have been used in New Zealand.
All of this major and ongoing reduction in the cases and
deaths relating to Meningococcal Disease has occurred before the
introduction of the MeNZB vaccination experiment.
"There is simply no credible scientific evidence that, placed
before an unbiased panel of politicians, scientists, economists
or a jury of ordinary citizens, could justify the continuation
of the existing mass vaccination experiment," says Ron Law
See also related:
Open Letter to Minister of Health: Serious MeNZB(tm) Adverse
Effects Covered Up
Medical Veritas: 'Tragic Consequences' of Childhood Vaccinations
Meningococcal Disease Continues to Abate
Saturday, 6 November 2004 Ron Law - Beyond Alternative Solutions
"The latest figures released by the Ministry of Health
yesterday show that, despite denials by the Minister of Health,
the meningococcal disease epidemic continues to abate,"
says independent risk & policy analyst Ron Law.
Insight: The Biology Of A Meningococcal Vax Company
Thursday, 11 November 2004 - By Barbara Sumner Burstyn and Ron
Law
Chiron Corporation. Does that name a ring a bell? In North
America, itís gone from barely known to highly recognized in
less than a month since 45 million doses of flu vaccine made by
the company in its British factory, were found to be
contaminated. In Brazil the company made headlines when over 5
million doses of a vaccine were recalled following serious
adverse reactions.
Ministry's Meningitis Data at Odds With Minister's
Friday, 12 November 2004 - by Ron Law, Independent Risk & Policy
Analyst
Beyond Alternative Solutions
"The Ministry of Health is singing from a different hymn
book to the Minister in deliberately trying to obfuscate the
facts surrounding the meningococcal disease debate," says
independent risk and policy analyst, Ron Law.
Ministry's Meningitis Data at Odds With Minister's
Friday, 12 November 2004 - by Ron Law, Independent Risk & Policy
Analyst
Beyond Alternative Solutions
"The Ministry of Health is singing from a different hymn
book to the Minister in deliberately trying to obfuscate the
facts surrounding the meningococcal disease debate," says
independent risk and policy analyst, Ron Law.
Evelyn Pringle:
Get Mercury Out Of Vaccines - NOW!
Thursday, 17 March 2005 SCOOP NZ
Mercury-based, thimerosal, used as a preservative in
childhood vaccines until recently, is now being blamed for a
host of neurological problems, including autism, ADD, ADHD, and
other learning disabilities. The number of children with these
problems can vary greatly depending on who you listen to, some
experts say there are about eight hundred-thousand learning
disabled children in the US, while others put the number as high
as eight million, according to Dr Jay Gordon.
30 November 2004:
Hawke's Bay District Health Board Joins Meningococcal
Pseudo-Science
By Ron Law
Independent Risk & Policy Analyst
"The Hawke's Bay District Health Board Meningococcal
Figures issued in its 25 November 2004 press release continues
the promulgation of the Ministry of Health's false and falsified
pseudoscience," says risk & policy analyst, Ron Law.
New Zealand has never been in the "grip of a
meningococcal B epidemic that has killed 220 people since 1991
and has seriously affected thousands more. More than 5400 cases
have been reported and the country has one of the highest rates
of the disease in the developed world."
This statement is pseudo-science on numerous counts.
1. According to official statistics released by the Minister
of Health, less than 50% of all cases of reported meningococcal
disease have been confirmed as being of the meningogoccal B
strain targeted by the MeNZB(tm) vaccine. To knowingly claim or
imply that all cases of meningococcal disease is due to the
MeNZB(tm) strain is fraudulent science.
2. The ESR has stated in its reports that between 10 and 25%
of all cases are falsely diagnosed as meningococcal disease; the
Minister has refused to deny this and mysteriously says that the
figures have been 'taken out of context'.
3. The Minister of Health yesterday released data showing
that the number of confirmed cases of meningococcal disease in
the Hawkes Bay District Health Board Region due to the bacteria
targeted by the MeNZB(tm) vaccine have declined by at least 82%
since peak levels in 1997 in the Hawkes Bay DHB region -- [cases
in all of NZ peaked in 2001] in the targeted vaccine group,
under 20 year olds.
4. The Ministry of Health's cost benefit analysis released
this week under the Official Information Act and used to justify
the MeNZB(tm) vaccination program was based on all under one
year olds being vaccinated FIVE times and all others FOUR times.
That fact has not been made public until now. Cabinet was not
told this either, but told that under one year olds 'might' need
a single booster, but that over one year olds wouldn't.
5. The target for meningococcal disease reduction in the
Hawkes Bay region [60% in the Ministry of Health's cost benefit
analysis] has already been exceeded - NATURALLY and without the
benefit of any experimental vaccine.
6. The HBDHB stated that meningococcal disease, "has
seriously affected thousands more." In fact, fewer than 1,000
people of all ages have been adversely affected by all strains
of meningococcal disease; simply put, the Ministry of Heath has
not bothered to research the sequelae caused by the MeNZB(tm)
strain of bacteria... based on the fact that the so-called
epidemic strain of meningococcal disease have the lowest
recorded fatality rate of any meningococcal bacteria anywhere in
the world, it is unlikely that more than a few hundred New
Zealanders have suffered permanent adverse effects during the
whole so-called epidemic. The 20% 'serious sequelae" figure is a
simple guess based on adverse effects of the much more severe
types A and C strains.
7. The HBDHB stated that the MeNZB(tm) vaccination experiment
"was started in Counties/Manukau last year and is being
implemented progressively throughout the country." This is
incorrect; It was started in July of this year.
8. Given that Treasury's independent cost benefit ratio
revealed that the costs of the experimental vaccine were 700%
more than the threshold for normal approval and unwarranted in
economic terms when meningococcal cases were at [national] peak
levels in 2001, and given that the number of cases due to the
MeNZB(tm) strain of meningococcal disease have declined 80%
since then, there is no rational reason for commencing the
proposed experimental vaccination program in the Hawkes Bay
region.
It is morally and scientifically wrong and fallacious for the
Hawkes Bay District Health Board to be using total meningococcal
cases for all age groups in New Zealand to justify the
experimental and untested mass vaccination of all under 20 year
olds in the Hawkes Bay area.
"Why don't the Hawkes Bay District Health Board's Spin
Doctors use factual, meaningful and relevant scientific data to
attempt to justify the experimental mass MeNZB(tm) vaccination
campaign?" asks Ron Law (09 832 4773) "Is it because
the Board knows that it simply wouldn't stand up to rational
scrutiny? Regurgitating the Ministry of Health's pseudo-science
uncritically is scientifically indefensible."
"This is another reason why there needs to be a
formal royal commission of inquiry into the falsification of
meningococcal disease data, via omission and commission, by the
Minister and Ministry of Health," says Ron Law.
See also:
Meningococcal Death Rate Lowest Since 1991
Red Flags Weekly:
Vaccines and Immune Suppression
Meningococcal Vax Campaign Starts Derailing
Friday, 20 May 2005
Ron Law & Barbara Sumner Burstyn
"The Minister of Health has confirmed that none of the five
deaths acknowledged as being due to meningococcal disease so far
this year could have been prevented by the MeNZB(tm) vaccination
programme," say risk & policy analyst Ron Law, and
writer/researcher Barbara Sumner Burstyn.
Dr Stewart Reid's Competing Interests
The Ministry failed to disclose Dr Reid's role as a Chiron
Corporation MeNZB clinical researcher at the same time as
advising the New Zealand Meningococcal Management Team on
licensure matters as an independent expert.
posted by Sepp Hasslberger
on Tuesday October 26 2004
updated on Saturday September 24 2005
URL of this article:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/10/26/new_zealand_meningococcal_mass_vaccination_experiment_scientifically_unjustifiable.htm
Readers' Comments
Here's a recent message by Chris Gupta of "Share
The Wealth" (by email):
The following excellent investigative journalistic work
by Barbara Burstyn & Ron Law clearly demonstrates how most
regulatory bodies work. Knowing, all to well, that such
cogent investigations are unlikely, and in the event that
they do occur most are powerless do anything about it, is
the ace that these unaccountable governmental bodies hold to
push the agenda of their cronies - all under the pretense
health protection. By design governments are unaccountable
we see these corrupt shenanigans time and time again. The
Nobel prize winner Milton Friedman aptly put it:
"Any system that gives so much power and so much
discretion to a few men so that mistakes - excusable or
not - can have such far reaching effects, is a bad
system. It is a bad system to believers in freedom just
because it gives so much power without any affective
check by the body politic - this is the key political
argument against.. central control."
Hence, central control such as our governments, be they
small or large, are the primary danger in the push for
globalization of health regulations such as
CODEX or any endeavor for that matter...
For a blow by blow sequence of event see
MeNZB? Quick Guide. Please circulate widely...
See also:
Meningococcal Disease at 10 to 13 Year Lows - Yet The
Vaccine Propaganda Continues
New Zealand: Ministry Resorts To 'Meningococcal Monsters' -
Media Silent
Disease Reduction & Medicine
Roots of Medical & Other Monopolies
Posted by:
Sepp
on March 1, 2005 03:00 PM
NZ Meningococcal Vaccination - Update 9 June 2005:
Evidence Shows MeNZB(tm) Vaccine Is Not Working
Ron Law & Barbara Sumner Burstyn
"The Ministry of Health press release this afternoon is
riddled with faith and false information," say risk &
policy analyst Ron Law and writer/researcher Barbara Sumner
Burstyn
1. The heading demonstrates faith... the MOH says that
the vaccine WILL work... this is a confession that they have
no evidence that it is working. In fact, the evidence to
date from Counties Manukau as shown on our Meningococcal
Gold Rush, Second Edition, clearly shows it is not. The
decline that had begun before the MeNZB(tm) vaccine was
rolled out continues... with no increase in the rate of
decline that would be expected if the vaccine was working.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0505/64dfd522489e6ded3bcc.jpeg
Even the Ministry's principal meningococcal advisor, Dr
Reid, states that the efficacy of the vaccine and the
duration of protection following vaccination are, at
present, unknown.
2. Claims on radio that there have been 15 cases in
Waikato this year are meaningless without knowing what types
they are. In fact, the MOH will know that many have not been
due to the epidemic strain of bacteria targeted by the MeNZB
vaccine. The Ministry should publish the breakdown of cases
in the whole of New Zealand.
3. Despite the Ministry of Health's rhetoric, Phase III
trials are the norm for new types of vaccines. When these
trials have been established then trials demonstrating
equivalence have been used for subsequent variations. If
phase III trials were not the norm, why did Chiron undertake
phase III trials for its Menjugate C vaccine in the USA
before abandoning its application for license?
4. The Ministry claims that the MeNZB vaccine is
protective against the epidemic strain of meningococcal
disease and yet its own expert committee [MAAC] was
concerned that there was no efficacy data; Dr Jane
O'Hallahan has stated that the vaccine would be rolled out
"without efficacy data," and the MOH principal adviser has
recently stated, "The efficacy of the vaccine and the
duration of protection following vaccination are, at
present, unknown." The Ministry's statement of protection is
junk science.
5. The Ministry states that about 75% of all cases of
meningococcal disease are due to the epidemic strain, and
yet a spread sheet circulated privately to Pro-MeNZB health
workers last week reveal that since 1997 only 50% of cases
have been confirmed as being of the epidemic strain and
barely a third of all cases have been confirmed as being of
the epidemic strain in under twenty year olds.
6. The Ministry says "The vaccine was licensed under The
Medicines Act under Section 23. This section enables a
license under provisional consent where the data provided
meets Medsafe requirements on both safety and protection
grounds and there is a clinical need for the vaccine in New
Zealand."
This statement is totally wrong and can only have been
made to try and muddy the debate. Section 23 is designed for
exactly the opposite type of evidence... where there is
insufficient evidence to warrant a proper licence.
7. If the Ministry of Health has worked with Medsafe (a
division of the MOH) to ensure the consent form and other
information prepared for the public met all requirements for
ensuring people had the information they required to enable
them to make an informed choice about whether to vaccinate,
why did Medsafe write to Dr Jane O'Hallahan, head of the
MeNZB vaccine programme, on August 3 2004, after the vaccine
was licensed and launched, to instruct her to include the
Minister's expert committee's concerns about lack of
efficacy data in the consent form? Why are parents still not
being told about those concerns, despite the fact that
telling parents was a condition of provisional license?
8. If the Ministry of Health makes all information,
including highly technical information prepared for doctors
and nurses, available to the public through the
www.immunise.moh.govt.nz website, why has it not published
its report on the epidemiology of meningococcal disease in
New Zealand in 2004, despite it being finished and
distributed to selected health professionals in April 2005?
Why has it circulated privately to pro MeNZB health
workers publications and databases that the Minister has
declined to release under the official information act?
Why is the Ministry of Health knowingly feeding the
public false information about the number of cases and
deaths due to the epidemic strain of meningococcal disease?
On Close-Up last Friday the MOH Dr Jacob's made false
statements denying that the number of deaths last year was
the lowest since the epidemic began. He said, falsely, that
it was the second highest.
On Morning Report this morning the Ministry of Health's
Dr Matheson made false statements regarding the licensing of
the MeNZB(tm) vaccine.
Whilst we are extremely disappointed at the Ministry of
Health's continued distribution of false information, we
believe that this is further evidence of the need for a full
public inquiry for reasons outlined in our Meningococcal
Gold Rush, Second Edition, investigation on Scoop. Until
that occurs, the public can have every reason to have
decreasing faith in the Ministry of Health.
Posted by:
Sepp
on June 9, 2005 10:57 AM
sir this paper should be made public to the parents of the children who
the govt is making money on king and dyson must be low on
their overseas investments ask the question get the medio
and t.v to air it yours cecilia doyle
Posted by: cecilia doyle on June 12, 2005
12:54 AM