Dr David Salisbury
[Chief hatchet man for the drug industry and the Allopaths for vaccination. He approved the Urabe MMR after it was withdrawn in other countries (see). See minutes: [pdf 8 March 1988] Looking like a great shooting in the foot--threatening One Click with lawyers, lets hope he carries on.]
"There
is a pandemic of autism among children in the western world and it is spreading
worldwide. ...... It has been caused by vaccinations of various kinds, but principally
the MMR. This has been known to the pharmaceutical
industry, the Western governments, and to the health and medical professions for
decades but they have mounted one of the most slick and collusive denials and
distractive tactics ever known."----Charles
Pragnell
[2009 March] From the UK: The Betrayal of a Nation's Children By Martin Walker
Dr David Salisbury, UK Gov Vaccines Director - Ooops! Never Mind Me, I'm Basil
Fawlty!
ONE CLICK RESPONSE David Salisbury
Vaccine Litigation
Doctor Questions David Salisbury On UK Measles Data
So who now is the Basil Fawlty of the MMR controversy?
[13 August – 24] The Utter Irrelevance of Professor Salisbury by Martin Walker
[2009 Jan] Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action
[Aug 2008] An open letter for the attention of David Salisbury from Alan Golding
[Media--Independent Feb 2002] MMR chief blames the media for jab 'errors'
See: 'Vaccines are Safe' lie Vaccine autism proven MMR Pluserix & Immravax (Urabe)
JOINT COMMITTEE ON VACCINATION AND IMMUNISATION
JOINT
SUB-COMMITTEE ON ADVERSE REACTIONS TO VACCINES AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PRODUCTS
[6 Feb 1987]
Salisbury,
Miller,
[6 July 1987]
Salisbury,
Meadow,
Miller
[2 Oct 1987]
Salisbury,
Meadow,
Miller
[8 March 1988]
[copy 2]
Salisbury,
McDevitt,
HULL,
Meadow,
Miller,
Rotblat,
[6 Oct 1989]
Salisbury,
Meadow,
Miller
[17 Sept 1990]
Salisbury,
McDevitt
Meadow,
Miller
Quotes by Salisbury
The evidence on MMR is absolutely clear - there is no link between the
vaccine and autism.---Professor David Salisbury, Department of Health 2008
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7545151.stm
"One of the first patients I saw [as a young doctor] was a 12-year-old boy who had come into hospital to die because his brain had been so devastated by the long-term effects of measles," he said. "And one of the first babies I had seen in the neonatal unit was one who had been damaged by congenital rubella. I don't need to see any of those again, but that will be the consequence of this drive for single vaccines."--Dr Salisbury
[Here is a denial classic.]
I asked you for evidence that demonstrated that
deaths were actually caused by the Urabe strain, and you have singularly failed
to provide any evidence whatsoever. You have provided media reports, opinions of
parents, and decisions of tribunals or courts. These are not evidence of
causality that implicates the Urabe vaccine.
Nobody would disagree that deaths have been reported after MMR vaccines. But
deaths after vaccination are very different from deaths caused by vaccination.
Dr David Salisbury, director of immunisation, department of health,
London 19.03.07
[2007] Parliament was given false MMR assurance
"This (MMR) is a safe vaccine."-------Dr David Salisbury, Government immunisation programme
Dr David Salisbury, national director for vaccines and immunisation at the Department of Health, said last night: 'The evidence is absolutely clear. No published study has ever shown a link between autism and the MMR vaccine. It is absolute nonsense to suggest otherwise.' New Health Fears Over Big Surge in Autism
Quotes re MMR Urabe that he approved:
"Up to 300 cases relate to this brand of vaccine - Pluserix - which was
banned by the Department of Health in 1992 after being linked with meningitis. This was two
years after an identical vaccine was banned in Canada."--Media
"In 1990, scientists from the Queen’s Medical Centre Nottingham found
some children developed a form of meningitis after receiving it. But despite this
the Government went on using it for more than two years. The Canadian
Government, also using the vaccine, immediately switched to a safer version. It was not
until September 1992 that the UK Department of Health issued pharmacists with emergency
supplies of a safer brand with instructions to withdraw existing batches."--Sunday Express
Quotes re Salisbury
On May 4th 1990, the minutes of the JCVI, headed by Professor
Salisbury, contain reference to some concerns. One might expect these concerns
to relate to the vaccine’s safety. Not so. The JCVI expressed concern
that details of the vaccines dangers are to be published in the UK,
thereby exposing the problem and causing a scare (JCVI Minutes 4 May 1990
Article 9.2g.) So, just to run through that one again, the JCVI members were
concerned about the Japanese data being published and the public being
warned, but apparently unconcerned about the fact they had licensed a
vaccine that is associated with meningitis.
[Aug 2008] An open letter for the attention of David Salisbury from Alan Golding
[Millions are spent by the government (taxpayer) so they can market the
products of the drug industry more effectively. See
Dr.
Buchwald MD quotes re fear research.]
The other considerable matter which Salisbury onanistically droned on about
was his department’s determination to understand public perception of the
various vaccinations. He introduced this matter by suggesting that no one else
(no other government) in the world was able to track the take-up and public
perception of vaccines in the way that the British government could. The data on
public perception of vaccine was massive, he said. The survey methods were
infinitely sensitive, the government even knew what newspapers respondents read.
In all, Salisbury and his colleagues had carried out 30 surveys into the public
outlook on vaccination, costing millions of pounds.
Listening only lethargically to this ‘evidence’, one might be moved by it.
‘The government really is interested in the public experience of
vaccination’, an observer might think. Of course nothing could be further from
the truth. All this data, all these surveys, all these millions of pounds have
been spent in order to advance the marketing of vaccines and to plan public
relations strategies which will ensure that the public accept the vaccine
programme without question. This is nothing to do with science, this is jury
rigging. The Utter Irrelevance
of Professor Salisbury by
Martin Walker
The refusal to cross examine might appear risky, in that it seemed to let
Salisbury off the hook with respect to important and simple questions such as:
‘Why did it take you two years to respond to Dr Wakefield’s first communication
with you, which warned the DoH of a public health crisis over MMR?’ and ‘Why did
it take six years for you to organise a meeting with Dr Wakefield to discuss his
ground breaking research?’ and finally, ‘Did you intend to suggest in your
evidence that Dr Wakefield was trying to blackmail the Department, by suggesting
he would precipitate a public health crisis unless you gave him money for
research?’
All the facts relevant to the charges against Dr Wakefield, Professor Murch
and Professor Walker Smith will of course be given in evidence by the defendants
themselves. If they remain accused. Dr Wakefield, in particular, will be able to
inform the panel about the considerable evasion indulged in by Professor
Salisbury and the Department of Health from the time that they were first
informed of the epidemic of adverse reaction to MMR. The Utter Irrelevance
of Professor Salisbury by
Martin Walker
