THE INVENTION OF AIDS by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.
http://www.boydgraves.com/class/invention.html
Do people with HIV/AIDS owe royalties to the patent holder of the AIDS virus? In
April 1984, Dr. Robert Gallo filed a United States patent application for his
invention, the HIV/AIDS Virus. Normally when a patent is filed and approved, as
Dr. Gallo's was, anyone who uses the product or invention owes a royalty payment
to the inventor. Thus, holding the intellectual property laws to their fullest
interpretations, one must only wonder why Dr. Gallo has yet to file a lawsuit
seeking to recover damages from the usage of his invention?
As odd as this scenario may sound, it bears need for additional scrutiny. The
scientific evidence is complete and compelling, the AIDS Virus is a designer bi-
product of the U.S. Special Virus program. The Special Virus program was a
federal virus development program that persisted in the United States from 1962
until 1978. The U.S. Special Virus was then added as 'compliment' to vaccine
inoculations in Africa and Manhattan. Shortly thereafter the world was
overwhelmed with mass infections of a human retrovirus that differed from any
known human disease, it was highly contagious and more importantly, it could
kill.
A review of the Special Virus Flow Chart ("research logic") reveals the United
States was seeking a 'virus particle' that would negatively impact the defense
mechanisms of the immune system. The program sought to modify the genome of the
virus particle in which to splice in an animal "wasting disease" called
"Visna".
According to the Proceedings of the United States of America, AIDS is an
evolutionary, laboratory development of the peculiar Visna Virus, first detected
in Icelandic sheep.
Recently, American and world scientists confirm with 100% certainty the
laboratory genesis of AIDS. This fact is further underscored when one reviews
the 'multiply-spliced' nature of the HIV 'tat' gene and Dr. Gallo's 1971 Special
Virus paper, "Reverse Transcriptase of Type-C virus Particles of Human Origin".
Dr. Gallo's 1971 Special Virus paper is identical to his 1984 announcement of
AIDS. Upon further review the record reveals that he filed his patent on AIDS,
before he made the announcement with Secretary Heckler. Earlier this year, Dr.
Gallo conceded his role as a 'Project Officer' for the federal virus development
program, the Special Virus.
The Flow Chart of the program and the 15 progress reports are irrefutable
evidence of the United States' secret plan to cull world populations via the
unleashing of a stealth biological microorganism that would 'waste' humanity. In
light of this true genesis of the world's most divesting biological scourge, it
is the United States that owes 'royal' payments to the innocent victims. Each
and every victim of AIDS is deserving of a formal apology and a sense of
economic closure for an invention of death and despair, perpetrated by the
United States.
The eyes of the world are upon the General Accounting Office's Health Care Team,
under the direction of William J. Scanlon. Between 1964 and 1978, the secret
federal virus program spent $550 million dollars of taxpayer money to invent
AIDS. It is now necessary to spend whatever it takes to dismantle an invention
that has led to the greatest crime against humanity in the history of the world.
~~~Additional Resources~~~
VIEW Web Archives: http://www.boydgraves.com
DOWNLOAD US SVCP Flow Chart: http://www.boydgraves.com/flowchart
SIGN Review Petition: http://www.boydgraves.com/petition
DONATE On-line: http://www.boydgraves.com/donate
CONTACT Us: http://www.boydgraves.com/contact
WRITE to US Congress: http://www.congress.org
RESEARCH Archives: : http://www.boydgraves.com/order/order.html
FORWARD to Friends: mailto:?subject=The Invention
of AIDS by Boyd E. Graves,
J.D.&Body= http://www.boydgraves.com/class/invention.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"We must let nature determine the finish line, not man.
We are greater than any federal virus program, we are the human race."
Dr. Boyd E. Graves, Lead Plaintiff for Global AIDS Apology
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 00-9587