[back] Laetrile
[back] G. Edward Griffin

World Without Cancer

a book by Edward Griffin


[Chapter 1] THE WATERGATE SYNDROME

[Chapter 8] THE LAETRILE "QUACKS"

[Chapter 10] The Hoax Of The "Proven" Cancer Cures by G. Edward Griffin 

Cancer: Radiation Therapy ?

The Four Optional Modes Of Cancer Therapy by G. Edward Griffin.

TESTIMONIALS

Griffin, Edward G. World Without Cancer. Westlake Village, California: American Media, 1997.Dr Dean Burk, Dr Krebs and Dr Hans Nieper MD

Griffin presents and proves two theses in one book: the first, that cancer is a nutritional deficiency disease, far more readily curable with vitamins and other natural remedies than with AMA-approved conventional approaches; the second, that there is a reason natural therapies are so strongly suppressed. That reason being a virtual conspiracy by powerful interests who are making huge fortunes from the cancer business. Exposure of the power structure's goals and means fits into this collection of social criticism materials. What is provided here for download amounts to ten percent of the entire book: Chapters 17, 18, 19 and 20. It is offered in hopes that the reader of this excerpt will be moved to purchase the book. American Media is passionate about the beliefs promulgated in their publications and offers quantity discounts on their titles in hopes the readers will buy a few to distrubute to friends and acquaintences. Downloads as a PDF, about 125kb. IN PRINT, COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL

Purchase: http://www.realityzone.com/worwitcan.html

Quotes/Extracts
Early in 1974, the California medical board brought formal charges against Stewart  M. Jones, M.D., for using laetrile in the treatment of cancer patients.  It was learned later, however, that Dr. Julius Levine, one of the members of that board, himself had been using Laetrile in the treatment of his own cancer.  When Dr. Jones’ case came up for review, the political pressures were so great that Dr. Levine felt compelled to resign from his post rather than come out openly in support of Dr. Jones and his patients. [Chapter 1] THE WATERGATE SYNDROME

With billions of dollars spent each year in research, with additional billions taken in from the cancer-related sale of drugs, and with vote-hungry politicians promising ever-increasing government programs, we find that, today, there are more people making a living from cancer than dying from it.  If the riddle were to be solved be a simple vitamin, this gigantic commercial and political industry could be wiped out overnight.  The result is that the science of cancer therapy is not nearly as complicated as the politics of cancer therapy.[Chapter 1] THE WATERGATE SYNDROME

This Watergate syndrome is not new.  Several years ago, an FDA agent who had testified in court against a Kansas City businessman admitted under cross-examination that he had lied under oath twenty-eight times.  When asked if he regretted what he had done, he replied: “No.  I don’t have any regrets.  I wouldn’t hesitate to tell a lie if it would help the American consumer.” [Chapter 1] THE WATERGATE SYNDROME

 During the course of Dr. Ivy’s trial, a letter was read into the court record written by a doctor from Indianapolis.  The doctor stated in his letter that he was treating a patient who had multiple tumors, and that a biopsy of the tissue had shown these tumors to be cancerous.  The doctor said that he had obtained Krebiozen from Dr.Ivy’s laboratories  and had administered it, but that it had done absolutely no good.  When called to the witness stand, however, the doctor’s answers were vague and evasive.  Under the pressure of cross-examination, he finally broke down and admitted that he never had treated such a patient, never had ordered the biopsy in question, and never had used Krebiozen even once.  The whole story had been a lie.  Why did he give false testimony?  His reply was that one of the FDA agents had written the letter and asked  him to sign it.  He did so because he wanted to help the agency put  an end to quackery.
    In September of 1963, the FDA released a report to the effect that Krebiozen was, for all practical purposes, the  same as creatine, a common substance that was found in every hamburger.  To prove this point, they produced a photographic overlay supposedly showing the spectograms of Krebiozen and creatine superimposed over each other.  These were published in Life magazine and other segments of the mass communications media as “unimpeachable proof” that Krebiozen was useless.
   
When Senator Paul Douglas saw the spectrograms, he was suspicious.  So he asked Dr. Scott Anderson, one of the nation’s foremost authorities on spectograms, to make his own study. Using standard techniques of analysis, Dr. Anderson identified twenty-nine differences between the two substances.  There were sixteen chemical and color differences.  The version released to the press by the FDA had been carefully moved off center until there was a maximum appearance of similarity, but when restored to the true axis, the two were as different as night and day. [Chapter 1] THE WATERGATE SYNDROME