Despite a natural human tendency to be shocked into silence
by the sheer number of dead and injured across Asia on 26 December 2004,
and despite also being slightly fearful of losing personal credibility
because of the magnitude of the apparent crime, there are many provable
irregularities in the official American tsunami story that simply have
to be recorded now, or forever be lost in the sands of time.
It is beyond any doubt that a giant tidal wave (tsunami)
smashed its way through South and South East Asia, and still had enough
legs to continue all the way across the Indian Ocean to Africa, where it
killed and injured a few hundred more. So the only question we must ask,
is whether this tsunami was a natural or man-made catastrophe? A natural
event would be horrifying enough, but if the tsunami was man-made, then
we are unquestionably looking at the biggest single war crime in global
history.
To make any sense at all of the irregularities, we must start
at the very beginning, and then follow the course of events as they
unfold, especially events in the immediate vicinity of the real tsunami
epicenter, because the latter is quite different from the location being
remorselessly peddled by the New York Times and CNN.
At midday local Australian time I faithfully recorded the
magnitude and position plotted by the Jakarta Geophysical Office in
Indonesia. An earthquake measuring 6.4 on the Richter scale had hit the
north of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. The Jakarta Geophysical
Office meticulously noted that the epicenter of the event was located
155 miles south-southwest of Aceh Province.
This location is approximately 250 miles south of the
position later selected by the American NOAA, which plotted the
epicenter to the north-west of Aceh, and initially claimed a Richter
reading of 8.0. Alas, even that was not enough to cover the damage
caused by this extraordinary event, so NOAA progressively upgraded the
reading to 8.5, then to 8.9, and finally to 9.0 - at least for the
present.
So, the first proven irregularities were peddled by American
officials at the NOAA, who suddenly invented a new 'flexible' peak
seismic wave for the event, of far greater magnitude than Jakarta, when
the Jakarta office was located much closer at almost point-blank range.
Believe me when I tell you there is no such thing as the new 'flexible'
peak claimed by NOAA. The first seismic peak you record is the only real
peak, unless of course you later manually draw in a few more peaks of
your own, to match a contrived agenda. Naturally there is also only one
epicenter, which was faithfully recorded by dozens of Indonesian and
Indian seismographs.
Quite apart from the huge disparity in Richter values, the
Indonesians and Indians were disturbed to find that the normal
earthquake 'preamble' was missing from their seismograph charts. All
this means is that the normal steadily increasing number of transverse
shear "S" waves that always precede an earthquake were missing, as were
later aftershocks, which likewise always accompany a naturally occurring
or Tesla standing-wave generated earthquake. There were 'warnings' of
aftershocks from the NOAA, but none actually eventuated.
To simplify matters for non-technical readers, an earthquake
is always triggered by a resonant electromagnetic frequency in the range
0.5 to 12 Hertz, but it is not an instant process, because the resonant
frequency must be precise. Thus as true resonance approaches, the fault
line starts to tremble like a piece of rope under tension, and sends out
warnings to the seismographs in the form of steadily increasing
transverse shear waves.
If all you get is a cluster of "P" compression waves, then
you are almost certainly looking at an underground or sub sea explosion.
These were in fact the only copious seismic signals that the Indonesians
and Indians received, and they looked curiously similar to those
generated many years ago by large underground nuclear weapons in
Nevada.