Simpsonwood meeting June 2000
THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
Deadly Immunity By ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
Quotes
Dr. Weil, pg. 207: "The number of dose related relationships are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant ..you can't accept that this is out of the ordinary. It isn't out of the ordinary." Dr. Bernier, pg 198 "the negative findings need to be pinned down and published."
As a pediatrician, who has been a fellow of the AAP for two
decades, I find the AAP’s approach to the autism epidemic to be deeply
disturbing. Not only have they allowed the myth of better diagnosing (as the
reason for all the notice given to affected children) to be perpetuated, but
when they were put on notice at the CDC’s Simpsonwood meeting in 2000, that the
mercury in the preservative Thimerosal was causing speech delays and learning
disabilities, they obfuscated and hide that information. They never made good on
their 1999 pledge to have Thimerosal eliminated from vaccines and almost a
decade later joined in the protest against a fictitious TV show (Eli Stone)
because it was critical of mercury being in vaccine.
Out of 132 million doses of the worthless1 flu vaccine for the 2007-08
flu season, 8 million doses are Thimerosal free. That means 94% contain the full
amount of Thimerosal.
If a pregnant woman got a flu shot
in 2001 and her child followed the flu shot recommendations, the baby/fetus
would have received six flu shots with the full amount of Thimerosal by the year
2005.
.......In a first analysis of the VSD datasets,
Verstraeten (et al) had described a 7.6 to 11.4 fold increase of autism risk in
children at one month, with the highest mercury exposure levels compared to
children with no exposure. In four subsequent separate generations of the
analysis, which involve the exclusion of children with no Thimerosal exposure
and less than two polio vaccines, the statistical significance disappeared.
This is what was published by the AAP even though they knew the truth. How did
they know the truth?
Again, they were presented at the
Simpsonwood meeting in June 2000, a meeting that was illegal to hold. No Federal
agency is allowed to call a meeting together with representatives of private
industry (all the vaccine manufacturers were represented at this meeting)
without opening the meeting to the public.
LES INCOMPETANTS: OPEN LETTER TO THE AAP
By K. Paul Stoller, M.D.
They were obviously terrified that the information would leak out to the
public. Stamped in bold letters at the top of each page of the study was the
words-"DO NOT COPY OR RELEASE" and "CONFIDENTIAL."
This is not the wording one would expect on a clinical study of vaccine
safety; rather you would expect it on top-secret NSA or CIA files. Why was this
information being secreted? The answer is obvious-it might endanger the vaccine
program and indict the federal regulatory agencies for ignoring this danger for
so many years. Our society is littered with millions of children who have been
harmed in one degree or another by this vaccine policy. In addition, let us not
forget the millions of parents who have had to watch helplessly as their
children have been destroyed by this devastating vaccine program.
THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
He continues by saying that the increase in neurobehavioral problems is probably real. He tells them that he works in a school system with special education programs and "I have to say the number of kids getting help in special education is growing nationally and state by state at a rate not seen before. So there is some kind of increase. We can argue about what it is due to." (page 207) THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
At this point Dr. Johnson tells the group of his concerns for his own
grandchild. He says, (page 200) "Forgive this personal comment, but I got
called out at eight o'clock for an emergency call and my daughter-in-law
delivered a son by c-section. Our first male in the line of the next generation
and I do not want that grandson to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we
know better what is going on. It will probably take a long time. In the
meantime, and I know there are probably implications for this internationally,
but in the meanwhile I think I want that grandson to only be given
Thimerosal-free vaccines."
So, we have a scientist sitting on this panel which will eventually make
policy concerning all of the children in this country, as well as other
countries, who is terrified about his new grandson getting a
thimerosal-containing vaccine but he is not concerned enough about your child to
speak out and try to stop this insanity. He allows a cover-up to take place
after this meeting adjourns and remains silent. THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
It is only during the last day of the conference that we learn that most of the objections concerning the positive relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and ADD and ADHA were bogus. For example, Dr. Rapin on page 200 notes that all children in the study were below age 6 and that ADD and ADHD are very difficult to diagnose in pre-schoolers. She also notes that some children were followed for only a short period. THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
Several of the participants tried to imply that autism was a genetic disorder and therefore could have nothing to do with vaccines. Dr. Weil put that to rest with this comment, "We don't see that kind of genetic change in 30 years." In other words, how can we suddenly see a 300% increase in a genetically related disorder over such a short period? It is also known that there are two forms of autism, one that is apparent at birth and one that develops later in childhood. The former has not changed in incidence since statistics have been kept; the other is epidemic. THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
Now this next statement should shock everyone, but especially the poor
who in any way think that these "vaccinologists" experts have their
best interest in mind. Dr. Johnson says on page 17, "We agree that it
would be desirable to remove mercury from U.S. licensed vaccines, but
we did not agree that this was a universal recommendation that we
would make because of the issue concerning preservatives for
delivering vaccines to other countries, particularly developing
countries, in the absence of hard data that implied that there was in
fact a problem."
So, here you have it. The data is convincing enough that the American
Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice, as
well as the regulatory agencies and the CDC along with these
organizations all recommend its removal as quickly as possible because
of concerns of adverse effects of mercury on brain development, but
not for the children in the developing countries. I thought the whole
idea of child health programs in the United States directed toward the
developing world was to give poor children a better chance in an
increasingly competitive world. This policy being advocated would
increase the neurodevelopmental problems seen in poor children (also
in this country) of developing countries, impairing their ability to
learn and develop competitive minds. Remember, there was a
representative of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. John
Clements, serving on this panel of "experts". He never challenged this
statement made by Dr. Johnson.
It also needs to be appreciated that children in developing countries
are at a much greater risk of complications from vaccinations and from
mercury toxicity than children in developed countries. This is because
of poor nutrition, concomitant parasitic and bacterial infections and
a high incidence of low birth weight in these children. We are now
witnessing a disaster in African countries caused by the use of older
live virus polio vaccines that has now produced an epidemic of vaccine
related polio, that is, polio caused by the vaccine itself. In, fact,
in some African countries, polio was not seen until the vaccine was
introduced.
The WHO and the "vaccinologist experts" from this country now justify
a continued polio vaccination program with this dangerous vaccine on
the basis that now that they have created the epidemic of polio, they
cannot stop the program. In a recent article it was pointed out that
this is the most deranged reasoning, since more vaccines will mean
more vaccine-related cases of polio. But then, "vaccinologist" have
difficulty with these "uncertainties". (Jacob JT. A developing country
perspective on vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Bulletin
WHO 2004; 82: 53-58. See commentary by D.M. Salisbury at the end of
the article.) THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
It should also be noted that it is a misnomer to say "removal of
thimerosal" since they are not removing anything. They just plan to
stop adding it to future vaccines once they use up existing stocks,
which entails millions of doses. And, incredibly, the government
allows them to do it. Even more incredibly, the American Academy of
Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice similarly
endorse this insane policy. In fact, they specifically state that
children should continue to receive the thimerosal-containing vaccines
until new thimerosal-free vaccine can be manufactured at the will of
the manufacturers. Are they afraid that there will be a sudden
diphtheria epidemic in America or tetanus epidemic?
The most obvious solution was to use only single-dose vials, which
requires no preservative. So, why don't they use them? Oh, they
exclaim, it would add to the cost of the vaccine. Of course, we are
only talking about a few dollars per vaccine at most, certainly worth
the health of your child's brain and future. They could use some of
the hundreds of millions of dollars they waste on vaccine promotion
every year to cover these cost for the poor. Yet, that would cut into
some fat-cat's budget and we can't have that.
THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
As they begin to concentrate on the problem at hand we first begin to
learn that the greatest problem with the meeting is that, they know
virtually nothing about what they are doing. On page 15, for example,
they admit that there is very little pharmacokinetic data on
ethylmercury, the form of mercury in thimerosal. In fact they say
there is no data on excretion, the data on toxicity is sparse, yet it
is recognized to cause hypersensitivity, it can cause neurological
problems and even death, and it is known to easily pass the
blood-brain barrier and the placental barrier.
Therefore, what they are admitting is that we have a form of mercury
that has been used in vaccines since the 1930s and no one has bothered
to study the effects on biological systems, especially the brains of
infants. Their defense throughout this conference is "we just don't
know the effects of ethylmercury."
[2004] THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
The medical literature is abound with studies on the deleterious effects of mercury on numerous enzymes, mitochondrial energy production, synaptic function, dendritic retraction, neurotubule dissolution and excitotoxicity, yet, he sees only a "theoretical risk" associated with an ever increasing addition of thimerosal-containing vaccines THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP By Russell Blaylock, M.D.
This is an incredible admission. First, what is a vaccinologist? Do
you go to school to learn to be one? How many years of residency
training are required to be a vaccinologist? Are there board exams?
It's a stupid term used to describe people who are obsessed with
vaccines, not that they actually study the effects of the vaccines, as
we shall see throughout this meeting. Most important is the admission
by Dr. Johnson that he and his fellow "vaccinologist" are so blinded
by their obsession with forcing vaccines on society that they never
even considered that there might be factors involved that could
greatly affect human health, the so-called "uncertainties." Further,
that he and his fellow "vaccinologists" like to think in concrete
terms-that is, they are very narrow in their thinking and wear
blinders that prevent them from seeing the numerous problems occurring
with large numbers of vaccinations in infants and children. Their goal
in life is to vaccinate as many people as possible with an
ever-growing number of vaccines. On page 17 his "concrete thinking"
once again takes over. He refers to the Bethesda meeting on Thimerosal
safety issues and says, "there was no evidence of a problem, only a
theoretical concern that young infants' developing brains were being
exposed to an organomercurial." Of course, as I shall point out later,
it is a lot more than a "theoretical concern". He then continues by
saying, "We agree that while there was no evidence of a problem the
increasing number of vaccine injections given to infants was
increasing the theoretical mercury exposure risk."
It's hard to conceive of a true scientist not seeing the incredible
irony of these statements. The medical literature is abound with
studies on the deleterious effects of mercury on numerous enzymes,
mitochondrial energy production, synaptic function, dendritic
retraction, neurotubule dissolution and excitotoxicity, yet, he sees
only a "theoretical risk" associated with an ever increasing addition
of thimerosal-containing vaccines. It is also important to note that
these geniuses never even saw a problem in the first place, it was
pressure from outside scientists, parents of affected children and
groups representing them that pointed out the problem. They were, in
essence, reacting to pressure from outside the "vaccinologist club"
and not discovering internally that a problem "might" exist.
In fact, if these outside groups had not become involved these
"vaccinologists" would have continued to add more and more
mercury-containing vaccines to the list of required vaccines. Only
when the problem became so obvious, that is of epidemic proportion
(close to that now) and the legal profession became involved would
they have even noticed there was a problem. This is a recurring theme
in the government's regulatory agencies, as witnessed with fluoride,
aspartame, MSG, dioxin and pesticides issues.
[2004] THE TRUTH BEHIND THE VACCINE COVER-UP
By Russell Blaylock, M.D.