Medical study ploys
[back] Medical Mind Control

[Classic recent science by design are the endless Government studies  proving that MMR 'doesn't cause autism' (see 1, 2, 3, 4 to dispel that myth).  With their backs to the wall they wheel out  The Cochrane Collaboration & Institute of Medicine (IOM) to put out a more credible smokescreen.
    Vaccine science uses the unproven Antibody Theory to prove vaccines are effective while never doing any studies using 100% unvaccinated children.  See Dan Olmsted to find out why they don't do that, while using stone age vaccine safety tests (see: Kendrick mouse test Mouse toxicity test Hist test) to get unsafe vaccines on the market.
    They have created a huge market for Hepatitis tests even though they haven't even proven a hep C virus even exists, also hep B virus, (not to mention the HPV vaccine) while the HIV test (see also CD4 cell counting) makes millions for its inventor, even though no evidence exists it causes AIDS (see Mullis), and some say it doesn't even exist.  Meanwhile thousands of studies proving nutritional medicine is better than pharma medicine just get ignored, some for 57 years.
    Recently (2007) a judge Lord Justice Sedley  ended up with egg on his face when he used the words junk science to rubbish an expert independent witness, who they then took before the GMC to discredit (see).  It backfired.  Turns out he was the one promoting junks science.
    The vaccine industry also rests on the quicksand of the false monomorphic Pasteurian disease theory.]

[2009 April] Merck published fake journal Merck paid an undisclosed sum to Elsevier to produce several volumes of a publication that had the look of a peer-reviewed medical journal, but contained only reprinted or summarized articles--most of which presented data favorable to Merck products--that appeared to act solely as marketing tools with no disclosure of company sponsorship.

[2009 Feb] Vaccine Studies: Under the Influence of Pharma by Barbara Loe Fisher

[2007] Help Wanted: Human Guinea Pigs by Betsy Model

Junk science quotes
Junk science articles

 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

Vaccine autism denial ploys
Autism and genetics
Autism increase "due to change in diagnosis"

Ploys
Anecdotes
Antibody Theory
Anti-Vitamin studies
Clinical Trials
Epidemiology
Healthy trial babies only
Hist test
Never unvaccinated controls
Inadequate safety studies
Junk Science
Kendrick mouse test
Looking were it ain't
Mouse toxicity test
NEVER ENOUGH STUDIES
No criticism or right of reply
Peer review
Placebos
Study data kept secret
Suppress studies/research
CD4 cell counting

Monkey business

DPT Mouse tests
Mouse toxicity test 
Kendrick mouse test 
Hist test

See: The Cochrane Collaboration  Institute of Medicine (IOM)

'The results were also so unexpected that many experts simply refused to believe them. Jackson’s papers were turned down for publication in the top-ranked medical journals. One flu expert who reviewed her studies for the Journal of the American Medical Association wrote, “To accept these results would be to say that the earth is flat!” When the papers were finally published in 2006, in the less prominent International Journal of Epidemiology, they were largely ignored by doctors and public-health officials. “The answer I got,” says Jackson, “was not the right answer.”[2009 Oct] Does the Vaccine Matter? by Shannon Brownlee and Jeanne Lenzer  '

Organized medicine quickly adopted the stance that his alleged "cures" fell into three categories: those who never had cancer in the first place; those who were cured by prior radiation and surgery; and those who died. When Healing Becomes a Crime --Kenny Ausubel

Francis M. Pottenger, MD and "The Hazards of a Health Fetish" By Ron Schmid, ND We've seen that the "Health Fetish" authors used technically (logically) true statements to completely distort Dr. Pottenger's findings. Only careful study of Pottenger's article would allow the choice of precisely the right words to accomplish this while avoiding making false statements. We may hope that the authors gained considerable understanding of Pottenger's work and its implications for the health of people everywhere. Perhaps they may someday use that knowledge in the way Dr. Pottenger intended.

Allowing other than sterile saline to be used as the placebo in short-term vaccine adverse-reaction studies to suppress the relative incidence rates to the point that these relative adverse-event rates show “no statistically significant” increase over the “placebo” (that, in some cases, has been allowed to be an experimental vaccine or the vaccine formulation without the biological antigens).
    Permitting vaccine safety studies to be restricted to a few days or, at most, a few of months even though some severe adverse outcomes do not begin to emerge until several years after vaccination (e.g., childhood MS 4 years after vaccination).
    Consenting to reductions in the size and number of persons in the phase-III clinical trials that not only reduce the vaccine makers costs but also reduce the risk that the study will find the rare but deadly adverse effects that a vaccine may have.
    Allowing surrogate endpoints (e.g., the reactivity of the patient’s blood to animal anti-sera) for specific antibodies to be used to assess vaccine efficacy instead of requiring comprehensive testing to establish both general and specific immunity in those vaccinated that is comparable to the immunity found in those who have had the disease.
    Recommending widespread use of new vaccines long before the long-term (at least 10-year) outcomes can be assessed in the trial population, and
    Licensing vaccines and recommending their “universal” use in populations that have near-zero risk of contracting a disease (e.g., the hepatitis B vaccine in young children or the HPV vaccine in non-sexually-active children) or where the clinical cases of the disease occur at low rate and are virtually absent in most demographic segments of U.S. population (e.g., the rotavirus vaccine). Key realities about autism, vaccines, vaccine-injury compensation, Thimerosal, and autism-related research----Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D & P.G. King PhD

"A story was told to me about an article written which detailed serious side effects to the whole-cell whooping cough vaccine in a large group of children. The medical journal refused to publish it, saying that before it would publish the article, the author must state categorically in the conclusion, that "the vaccine was safe and effective". Thinking this was a joke, the author added the required sentence, and the article was published. When told this story, I didn't believe it. I was handed a copy, and was flabbergasted.
      I was told that in order to have ANYTHING published, the only way that authors could voice reservations was to couch them in as bland a language as possible, and hide these reservations in the body of the article unless the "problem" was blatantly obvious to a blind man."--Hilary Butler p. 203

When intellectual dishonesty becomes a crime: Nature and its cynical promotion of bad science
http://www.aidsorigins.com/content/view/219/2/  I think it is now high time for me to make a frank public statement about Nature and its nefarious role in this debate. The fact that Nature regularly publishes alleged "refutations" of the OPV theory and that it does so to enormous fanfare, the fact that it has competed vigorously with its rival Science in order to publish such "refutations", and the fact that it has never published an exposition of the OPV theory, or allowed a single paragraph of space to any proponent of the OPV theory, reveal that the rejection slips from Nature have nothing whatsoever to do with the volume of correspondence that that journal receives. Instead, they are reflections of Nature's determination to promote an explanation for how AIDS began that is supported only by certain powerful governments, and by a perversion of sound scientific method.
   ....In short, on this particular topic, Nature has abandoned the most basic principles of scientific enquiry. Instead the journal has consistently acted as if it is a stooge of certain powerful governments and interst groups.