Luise Light, MS, EdD
Luise Light, MS, EdD, former USDA Director of Dietary Guidance and Nutrition
Education Research, was responsible for the original food guide pyramid and
revamping USDA's nutrition information. Hired as an expert to develop new
nutrition and cancer prevention programs, she devised the National Cancer
Institute's first diet and cancer prevention guidelines, and directed national
health promotion programs with supermarkets, the American Cancer Society, the
Red Cross, schools, and State health departments. After the Cancer Institute,
she founded and led a Washington-based nonprofit organization that educated the
media, Congress and the public about cutting edge, controversial health and
nutrition issues that were the subject of high profile, disinformation campaigns
by industry interests.
Dr. Light has been health editor of Vegetarian Times and executive editor
of New Age Journal, and now teaches, counsels and writes in Vermont, where she
also is an elected Bellows Falls official. Her new book, What to Eat; The Ten
Things You Really Need to Know to Eat Well and Be Healthy, published by
McGraw Hill, is in bookstores now.
Web: http://www.luiselight.com
[2003] Fluoride -The Battle of Darkness & Light by Mary Sparrowdancer
A Fatally Flawed Food Guide by Luise Light, Ed.D
Quotes
Where we, the USDA nutritionists, called for a base of 5-9
servings of fresh fruits and vegetables a day, it was
replaced with a paltry 2-3 servings (changed to 5-7 servings a
couple of years later because an anti-cancer campaign by another
government agency, the National Cancer Institute,
forced the USDA to adopt the higher standard). Our
recommendation of 3-4 daily servings of whole-grain breads and cereals was
changed to a whopping 6-11 servings forming the base
of the Food Pyramid as a concession to the processed
wheat and corn industries. Moreover, my nutritionist group had placed baked
goods made with white flour — including crackers, sweets and other
low-nutrient foods laden with sugars and fats — at the
peak of the pyramid, recommending that they be eaten
sparingly. To our alarm, in the “revised” Food Guide, they were now made part of
the Pyramid’s base. And, in yet one more assault on dietary logic,
changes were made to the wording of the dietary
guidelines from “eat less” to “avoid too much,” giving a nod to
the processed-food industry interests by not limiting highly
profitable “fun foods” (junk foods by any other name)
that might affect the bottom line of food companies.
But even this neutralized wording
of the revised Guidelines created a firestorm of angry
responses from the food industry and their Congressional allies who believed
that the “farmers’ department” (USDA) should not
be telling the public to eat less of anything,
including saturated fat and cholesterol, meat, eggs and sugar.
I vehemently protested that the
changes, if followed, could lead to an epidemic of obesity
and diabetes — and couldn’t be justified on either health or nutritional
grounds. To my amazement, I was a lone voice on this
issue, as my colleagues appeared to accept the “policy
level” decision. Over my objections, the Food Guide Pyramid was finalized,
although it only saw the light of day 12 years later, in 1992. Yet it
appears my warning has come to pass.
A Fatally Flawed Food Guide
by Luise Light, Ed.D
Interview
Q: Why did you write this book?
A: I have a dramatic story to tell and feel passionate about it. After all,
more people get sick and die of diet-related health problems than terrorist
bombs in this country, yet we ignore the former and invest in the latter. We
need to do both. When I looked at survey data, it was apparent that the public
was following the number of grain servings recommended in the new food pyramid
(1992), and it was having a dire affect, as I had predicted it would: massive
and widespread obesity, skyrocketing rates of Type 2 diabetes even among
children. I kept seeing the pyramid foisted on the public as a nutrition
solution when I knew better than anyone that it was the food industry's
solution, not that of professional nutritionists worried about the public's
health. I also saw the pervasive changes in commercial foods undermining the
nutritional adequacy of diets, especially those of children, teens, young and
elderly adults who were eating fewer fruits and vegetables and more synthetic
ingredients and additives dangerous to health.
Q: There are a lot of other people the media could interview about
nutrition and dieting. What can you share about the topic that the others can't?
A: There are many nutritionists who say we need to eat differently--better
and more simply, eating more fresh, local and whole foods. They have the
message, but they don't know why the old food messages (eat everything in
moderation; all food is good food, no matter how altered in processing) keep
swinging back around into the limelight, despite rejection by most nutritionists
and public health authorities. The reason these old, discredited messages keep
coming back to haunt us is because they are promoted by global, multi-national
companies aiming to control global food and agriculture, and their biggest
profits from foods made of sugar, fat and refined flour. Nutrition in their view
is just a marketing tool All this and more I learned working at the USDA,
lobbied continuously by the major food trade groups, my work subject to their
edits and revisions. Remember, "Ketchup is a vegetable?" I was there. I tell the
story in my book. Today, the government-lobbyist revolving doors are as robust
in agriculture as in all the other agencies under the present administration.
The agency that released the new food pyramid in 2005 was led by a former vice
president of the Pork Producers Association. Do you think he might have a slight
bias about what's good to eat?
Q: What opinion, belief, advice, or information do you have which is
"counter-intuitive" for most people?
A: My counter-intuitive advice about dieting and healthy eating follows ten
simple guidelines, based on solid research--research that's been buried or
neglected by USDA because it doesn't support the food industry's marketing
objectives, which are to keep major food groups from taking a nosedive in the
stock market because consumers are not buying them based on nutrition advice not
to eat them. There are 50,000 foods in the average big box supermarket. We can
only eat 14 or 15 foods daily. We have to prioritize based on nutrition and
avoid the foods we can least afford for good health and good weights. Marketers
don't want to hear that.
Q: Can you help people solve or avoid a serious problem? If so, how would
you dramatize the problem during an interview?
A: Yes, my book can help you avoid or mitigate most of the major chronic
illnesses and conditions many of us are prone to, including heart disease,
cancer, diabetes, arthritis, asthma, osteoporosis, neuromuscular, and autoimmune
diseases, among others. Best of all it is a natural and "sane way" to lose
weight without starving or compromising your nutritional state. Glamour magazine
(January 2006 issue) deemed it "one of the sanest diet books we've seen in
years."
Ketchup is Not a Vegetable; Sane Eating in a Toxic Food World.