[back] Law [back] Word game
[One of the main control ploys. One UK law is the CANCER ACT 1939. Only Allopaths can openly treat Cancer so no other doctor can use the word cure in regards to cancer or the word in regards to herbs and nutrients, which is why most folk think drugs are better than herbs and nutrients when the opposite is true. Allopathy and Allopath are pretty much forbidden words.]
See: Book banning Pharma hoax quotes Law
Unfortunately the word "cure" is the sole property of the drug companies. If a nutritional supplement company uses this term they are attacked judiciously. This often leads to bankruptcy. As a result, many natural cures are buried.  Interview of Shane Ellison author of Health Myths Exposed
"Medicine in our country has been on a crusade over the last 100 years to wipe out
every other form of medicine. One of the things they did that was unique was they lobbied
to make words legal only for them to use. Today in the US, only a medical doctor can
diagnose a disease, prescribe something, and cure you. Nobody else can say
"diagnose", "prescribe" and "cure". That means that nobody
can cure you but a medical doctor
.I cant say "Chaparral is the cure for a
tumour". I cant say garlic is the cure for cholestrol or high blood pressure.
They have made the laws. So that makes me look stupid, impotent, and it makes the herbs
look weak and wimpy.
I cant as a herbalist, say that an herb will cure, even though a lot of prescription drugs are made from herbs.
This was a tactic by organised medicine to wipe out the opposition, by making them look silly and impotent they have the words they control the high ground. They can walk out and say, "Yes, if you take this drug, you will cure yourself." But they hired lawyers and got the government behind them. If I say that I go to jail. It isnt because the herbs dont work and the drugs are better, its just because they have more money, they lobbied more and got the law passed in their favour. That is why people get this idea that herbs dont cure you."Dr Shulze.
"The only accepted legal medical diagnosis of cancer is by biopsy. This is not 100% accurate, for there are false positives as well as false negative biopsies. We, that is you and I, are not permitted to make a diagnosis of cancer. Nor are we permitted by law to use any system of diagnosis except biopsy for cancer diagnosis. The Medical Establishment tightly controls the diagnosis of cancer."--Dr Kelley DDS
As you know, even though we have the First Amendment in the
Constitution, the FDA has negated the First Amendment
when it comes to free speech in health care ever since about the ‘40s and ‘50s.
That’s why if you pick up your bottle of vitamins in your local natural
food store, let’s say you pick up a bottle of Vitamin
E or something, all it says is “supports cardiovascular health.” Because if they
were to put on there that Vitamin E has been found in
this scientific study over here to cut the rate of heart
attacks by this percent, even though the research is true, they could be
hauled up by the FDA on the grounds of making an
unapproved claim. The FDA doesn’t care whether it’s true or not, they just care
whether they’ve approved it.
And so, fish oil, for example. Everybody knows, and all the major medical journals have published it in the last two years, that taking enough fish oil every day cuts your risk of sudden cardiac death by 50 percent or more, and yet if anybody put that on a label of a fish oil bottle, they would be out of business tomorrow, I guarantee it.
..........here’s another little inside truth, not secret, but truth. It gets printed every once in a while and I’ve seen it online. In the mid 1990s, at someone’s cardiology convention, the Annual Convention of the American College of Cardiologists or something, one of the speakers asked that particular audience, “How many of you recommend Vitamin E to your patients?” And approximately 25 to 30 percent of the doctors there raised their hands—remember this is conventional, that’s pretty good. And, “How many of you take Vitamin E yourself?” Better than half of the room raised their hands!
............Here’s a research article from Finland, or from Scandinavia anyway, it might have been Finland. A whole bunch of kids, starting at age one, were started on 2000 units (and we’re told by the FDA that’s going to kill them if they’re one year old) of Vitamin D, and that was maintained for a few years, and there’s a control group that didn’t get any Vitamin D. And when they finally looked at all the statistics, the number of new cases of type-1 diabetes—juvenile diabetes—had been reduced by 80 percent! An exclusive interview with pioneering physician Dr. Jonathan Wright http://downloads.truthpublishing.com/DrWright.pdf