Lisa C Blakemore-Brown
Lisa Blakemore-Brown is an independent applied psychologist
specialising in ADHD, Asperger Syndrome and related disorders. She is Chairwoman
of Promoting Parenting Skills (BPS Psychologists). Her recent research has
focused on early intensive system intervention, and the increasing professional
recognition of the overlapping features of ADHD and Asperger Syndrome.
See: Smearing of Dr Wakefield Whistleblowers
Website http://www.lisablakemorebrown.co.uk/ http://thimerosalthoughts-bb.blogspot.com/
BBC Panorama Becomes UK Government Mouthpiece Protecting Vaccine
Industry
From protecting struck off paediatrician Dr David Southall to promoting
the Swine Flu vaccine, the previously respected BBC Panorama programme
has now elected to become the UK government mouthpiece for the vaccine
industry. Lisa Blakemore Brown says: "So much for balanced reporting. So
much for Panoramic vision. So sad for the public and the right to
freedom of speech and information in a so called democracy."
Lisa Blakemore Brown, Psychologist
Hidden David Southall MSBP Film Internet Released http://www.liveleak.com/browse?all&user=9176201-H
[June 2007 Thimerosol] As predicted - media spinning itself dizzy by Lisa Blakemore-Brown
[July 2007 Blog] MMR, Mercury and the Mystery surrounding my book by Lisa Blakemore-Brown
[JABS jan 2007] The victimisation of Lisa Blakemore-Brown
[Media Oct 2005 Autism expert] I'm being driven out says second expert to link autism and jabs
[Letter BMj Flu vaccine reaction, 2005]
[Lisa C Blakemore-Brown Letter BMJ Feb 2005]
[Letter BMJ Aug 2001] Consultation document on MSBP
Quotes
There are so many profoundly serious issues connected to the vaccine
programme which have yet to be written about in the British Press that its
difficult to know where to start.Here is one issue:
Professor Elizabeth Miller, Head of
the Immunization Department in the UK who worked closely with Bob Chen at the
CDC when the first Thimerosal studies were being "managed", sat in the Joint
Committee for Vaccination and Immunisation/Adverse Reactions Sub Committee, with
Dr David Salisbury and none other that Professor Roy Meadow, of MBSP fame, when
the MMR was being introduced.
In the Sally Clark case, Professor
Meadow accused her of killing two children who had just been vaccinated, one
just 5 hours earlier. To my certain knowledge, as a Psychologist specialising in
Autism since 1993, and working as a generic Psychologist since 1984, many
parents whose children reacted to a vaccine have been wrongly accused of MSBP.
Known side effects have been morphed into child abuse. Workers have been taught
to view them this way and act accordingly. Some have had their children taken
from them, some were sent to prison and Sally Clark lost her children and her
life.
Gerberding in the US in the last
two days has cast serious doubt on the validity and reliability of the
epidemiology of which Professor Miller was a part.
What has been going on behind the
dark curtain of international pharmaceutical/political commercial interests?
Why would Professor Meadow accuse people of harming
their children when he knew vaccine reaction had to be part of the differential
diagnosis? Why would Professor Miller allow herself to be involved in flawed
epidemiology?
Why would Professor Salisbury, as a Government medical
representative allow all of it to happen? Posted by:
Lisa Blakemore-Brown |
Sunday, 22 June 2008 at 12:59 PM
During the seventies when my own interest in this once very rare
disorder began to emerge, if I told people about this interest they
usually thought I was saying `artistic` as `autistic` was unheard of.
As Hilary Butler says, the incidence was SO low that the behaviours
we now see in front of us in every classroom - the BEHAVIOURS Camille,
not the DIAGNOSES - were confined to very few children who invariably
were found alternative schools as they could not be taught and managed
in the school system.
As the epidemic of autistic BEHAVIOURS has risen dramatically in the
last few years, the system has introduced various measures and sleights
of hand to make us all think that these BEHAVIOURS were all there before
but not seen. INCLUSION policies put pressure on everyone including
EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNAL PANELS to ensure these BEHAVIOURS are not viewed as
autism but MISINTERPRETED as something else - anything else but not
autism given the legal challenge/iatrogenic issue - and increasingly
seen to be the fault of the parents. Independent professionals such as
myself are targeted.
Teaching hospitals are removing diagnoses and reinterpreting the
BEHAVIOURS which now have teachers and assistants on their knees trying
to cope yet forced into saying they can cope - especially in Educational
Tribunals.
Tried and tested intensive methods and facilities which used to be in
place when the numbers of autistic children were manageable are now
being removed from schools with staff forced into introducing wholly
ineffective `BEHAVIOURAL` policies with `the child must take
responsiblity for his own BEHAVIOUR` at their pivot. This is because the
numbers of children with autistic BEHAVIOUR problems has sky rocketed,
so its cheaper and easier to blame the child or the parent to limit the
resource costs. It also conveniently shifts the focus of the real
causes.
The system has polished up its methods for focusing on parents who
are blamed for causing their children's disorders, but it dare not
introduce the methods to help the children as this is not only expensive
but tantamount to admitting what it refuses to accept - that there is an
epidemic of autistic spectrum disorders and that there must be an
explanation.
Focused, intensive but costly interventions delivered by specialists
are being replaced by general `programmes` drawn out of the cascade
model after someone attends a one day seminar then passes on information
on a photocopied sheet to be delivered by classroom assistants on the
lowest hourly rate of pay.
The whole thing is a massive, massive scandal. [Lisa C
Blakemore-Brown Letter BMJ Feb 2005]
