RESPONSES TO AN ORMUS PREPARATION,
AND TO SINGLET OXYGEN THERAPY,
AS SHOWN BY A COMPUTERISED KIRLIAN TECHNIQUE
by Dr. Roger Taylor
This technique, called Gas-Discharge Visualisation (GDV), was developed by
Dr Konstantin Korotkov of St. Petersburg (see websites http://www.kti.spb.ru in Russia, and http://www.gdvresearch.com
in the US). The fingers are placed individually on a glass electrode, to which
is supplied a high voltage high frequency pulse. Light from the resulting
electric discharge through the air around the finger is picked up by a CCD
camera, and the digitised image sent to the computer. Immediately below are
examples of the images which are sent to the computer.
The image above shows the change in a single finger after (a) ormus, and
(b) singlet oxygen. What is mainly evident is the change in area; the other
parameters are less obvious.
The examples above show the appearance when images from
all ten fingers are arranged around a "manikin" so as to look like an aura.
The numbers at the bottom represent measured changes in area.
This is shown for the ormus response only.
The imformation from this type of image is digitized and run through a computer program for interpretation. The software allows
quantitative analysis of a number of parameters, and so permits objective
comparisons to be made.
I had been on a water-trap ormus preparation (Rhodium/Gold) [from Mountain
Manna] for several months. In order to test my response I stopped taking
it for 5 days, and then took a large dose (about 6x the recommended daily
dose). GDV readings were taken just before, and at intervals after this dose.
In Graph A, the green line represents the area of the image averaged over
all ten fingers. An increase in this quantity ("expansion of the aura") is
most generally indicative of health. Light blue represents brightness: increase
is a good sign if it is together with increased area, but may indicate
stress if it occurs at the expense of area. Dark blue represents fractality
of the border, and red represents so-called "noise": the area of the image
in fragments less than 30 pixels. Both of these should ideally be low. It
can be seen that the response reaches maximum in about 5 hours, and then
dies away by the next day.
Singlet Oxygen Therapy was developed by Tony Van der Valk (see his website http://www.polyvalk.com).
Air passes first through water, so as to be saturated with water vapour,
and then passes a red (634nm) LED that shines on a phthalocyanine compound.
This catalyses the conversion of atmospheric oxygen to the extremely reactive
singlet oxygen. The singlet oxygen immediately donates its energy to the
water vapour, which can then be breathed through a loose nasal cannula.
The energy is of a grade high enough (about 1 eV) to generate light in the
body. None of the usual biochemical reactions can reach such an energy. It
thus performs the same function as the other Oxygen Radicals, which are obtained
normally with negative ions, UV light, etc., and can be therapeutically supplied
by ozone, hydrogen peroxide, etc. Tony Van der Valk's method is, however,
more effective, more convenient and safer than these last. The question
of the essential function of Oxygen Radicals has been thoroughly researched
by Prof. Vladimir Voekov (V.L. Voekov and V.L. Naletov: "Weak Photon
Emission of Non-Linear Chemical Reactions of Amino Acids and Sugars in Aqueous
Solutions". 1998 . In Biophotons: J.-J. Chang, J. Fisch and F.-A. Popp Eds.
Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht pp. 93-108) and the fundamental role
of light energy in the maintenance of quantum wholeness in the living organism
has been researched by Dr Fritz Popp, and many other authors over the last
thirty years (see Dr Mae-Wan Ho's excellent book "The Rainbow and the Worm",
World Scientific, 2nd Ed. 1998).
I have been taking Singlet Oxygen Therapy (15 min twice per week) for about
two years, with considerable benefit to my energy. The GDV test was done
after 6 days without taking it. After the initial reading, I took a 20 min
treatment, and then took further readings at intervals.
Graph B (on singlet oxygen) shows a good response, similar to Graph
A, except that the peak and subsequent decline were reached somewhat earlier.
I suggest that these therapies may be mutually complementary. Thus one may
require sufficient superconductivity in the system before the light energy
can be properly utilised. It may be relevant that considerable light energy
is known to be stored in the living organism in the form of electronic excitations,
and that Fritz Popp has evidence that it is mostly stored in the DNA.
Following are Roger Taylor's responses to the Survey for "Regular (self-defined) ORMUS users", self-assessed:
My ormus usage is:
1. trap water
By Regular I mean:
My overall physical health is:
My infectious disease occurrences are:
2. Rarely - but on the rare occasion when I get a cold I have a lung infection.
My level of degenerative type disease for my age is:
2. Very few degenerative diseases, compared to others my age. Age 73: chronic bronchitis of 8 years standing.
My overall physical health since becoming a "regular ormus user" has:
2. Somewhat improved
Please add any significant comments:
My energy had already been restored before starting ormus, due to taking
singlet oxygen therapy for 2 years. Otherwise I might have seen more response