![]() Adams 2 Pole Motor.jpg 782x513 (54 K) |
![]() Dr Robert Adams2.jpg 862x590 (41 K) |
![]() Motor Mark 2 close72.jpg 1005x648 (48 K) |
![]() Motor Mark 2 993x626 (40 K) |
The 'Adams 2 Pole' Motor was built from an old aircraft altimeter casing around 1965. Dr Adams tested this motor over a period of ten days observing that it consumed little or no power over that time from the bank of 1.5v NiCad batteries employed. The batteries were taped around the perimeter for this test. In the second picture, Dr Adams is sitting on his workbench near my 'Mark 1 Motor' which was designed not so much to prove the possibility of free energy but that, while employing crude materials and construction, a functioning motor can be constructed. I am somewhat embarrassed by it's poor construction but include it if only to show that Mark 1 does exist and to lend credence to my naming scheme. (I could have scrubbed it out of the picture.) The 'Mark 2 Motor' pictured is powered by a 12v, 1.3ah battery. The 2 mild steel bolt cored stators in series total just on 40 ohms. My tests showed it lose 0.1 volts per hour. The problem identified by Dr Adams before testing even began was that the stator coils are not made of suitable material and the timing disc is not precisely made. Also, the stator face needs to be 75% of the area of the magnet face. 'Mark 3 Motor' does exist but makes no advance on 'Mark 2 Motor' except that it does employ four stators using ferrite cores for a total of around 27 ohms. I have not conducted precise tests on the 'Mark 3 Motor'. My personal conclusion is that the need for precision in construction method and strict adherence to instructions cannot be over stressed. My lack of attention to detail can be construed as a contributing factor in the failure for the Mark 1, 2, & 3 motors not demonstrating anything remarkable on the 'Free Energy' front. Let's hope Mark 4 can sway the doubters. Regards, Gordon. Wednesday, 9 May 2001 |