Zaman Yolculuğunu Araştırma Merkezi © 2005 Cetin BAL - GSM:+90 05366063183 -Turkey / Denizli
ENERGIE - DES SOLUTIONS POUR PRODUIRE SANS DETRUIRE L'ENVIRONNEMENT
" Il n'y a pas de crise de l'Energie, mais simplement une crise
d'Ignorance " B.Fuller
THE BIGGEST DISCOVERY OF
Page créée le 9 novembre 2002
The world of ufology has been wondering about the realityof UFOs for
more than fifty years. Testimonies are legion but the explanation ismissing.
Therefore, the phenomenon is denied. The testimony which follows
shouldreconcile the logic of scientific fact, which we deny, with these
appearances ofhigh strangeness. The answer proposed here will not fail to
challenge manyestablished certainties. The professor Joseph Allen Hynek, the
famous Americanufologist, who was at first very sceptical then wildly in
favour of the realityof UFOs wrote: " when we have the solution of the
UFO enigma, Ithink that it will be revealed to be not just one step more in
the advance ofscience, but a powerful and unexpected quantum jump. "
This sentence is known worldwide! There are dates inHistory which, I believe
should not be missed. This article proposes anunexpected solution. Even
better, a metaphysics! That is to say a physicscontaining all the physics:
time has three dimensions ! Direction, Density and
You certainly remember the film 'Matrix' in which a smallgroup of men and
women succeeded in getting out of the illusory reality of theworld. It is
exactly what we are going to do, at least by our thought. We
aregoing to get out of the matrix for a moment , just the "time" tounderstand
the universe in which we live, such as I perceived it during a deeplymoving,
transcendental personal experience.
One cannot explain UFOs and paranormal phenomena with ourcurrent means of
investigation, nor even with the present interpretation whichwe have of the
universe which surrounds us. I pay tribute to the scientists ofthe planet
who, every day, experience the anxiety of the subject to be resolvedand who,
when they turn around, find nobody to whisper them the solution. Yetthey
pursue their research with patience. We are going to discover together
whatthey call a new paradigm without which it is perhaps useless to search.
Before leaving our 'world' to grasp the incredibleexploits of UFOs, and the
no less disturbing aspects of parapsychology, I thinkit would be useful to
share with you a series of surprising sightings. Butbefore, here is a brief
presentation of my career.
My main profession has been in aviation, and I have neverbeen brilliant in
scientific studies and have an ordinary intelligence. Afterfive years in the
Air Force as a military air-traffic controller (tower andradar), I earned my
living in the world of specialized media (economy and stockexchange) to
finance studies to become a professional pilot. As soon as Iobtained my
license, I went into commercial aviation, at first ontwin-turbo-propellers
then on twin-engine jets. With the Gulf war, some airlinecompanies
disappeared, including mine. I then went to university and obtained adiploma
of specialized higher studies in economics (new technologies).Immediately an
airline company hired me as on duty station manager.Four and a half years
and a promotion later, I was co-opted by the airport inwhich I worked. After
being In charge of airport resources, in the operationsdept, I had a two-year
break on the (French) Island of Reunion (Indian oceannear Mauritius) and
then returned to a bigger airport where I am working atpresent.
My contacts with UFOs were relatively numerous, eitherdirectly or indirectly,
but especially in very varied ways. Here, I shall justmake a short list:
- 1977 : Appearance of an orangey brilliant ball
in the sky over Toulon, prodigious acceleration, an angle of 90° then
disappearance (in less than three kilometres (two miles)
- 1983 : Appearance of a radar echo flying at 28
000 kph (17500 mph) from east to west, in the North of Reims, on my
panoramic screen (at a distance of about 25 kilometres).
- 1984 : Appearance of a saucer on the air base
of Reims where I was living, (reported by a colleague controller) (less
than 200 metres distance away).
- 1990 : Appearance, during a day- dream, of a
technical design of an UFO, surrounded by three non-human creatures (see
- In December 2001 : appearance of saucer 300
metres away from our holiday resort on the Isle of Mauritius (reported by
- In February 2002 : appearance of a very fast
light (less than 200 metres away) right above our house on the island of
- In March 2002 : a transcendental experience
preceded by a loud noise, identical to one of my wife's UFO sightings. The
noise was right above the house. It is the results of this experience that
is reported in this article.
- In October 2002 : a ballet of lights (between
ten and fifteen), between our two houses, (during a house move), at the
west of Arras which seemed like a silent air battle with erratic movements
lasting for twenty five minutes. The passage over one of our houses of a
triangular craft, with a light in each corner, twenty metres (60 feet),
from the roof. Approximate size of the craft: fifteen metres (45 feet) (reported
by my wife and two of my children).
The details of these observations and events have already been reported
in other medias or web sites, so it is not necessary to extend on them here.
I suggest we enter the experience, or rather both major experiences from my
point of view.
ACT I: THE CRAFT.
In 1990, during a nap, I found myself projected into astrange
environment where there were three non-human entities, i.e. notbelonging to
our race. Although I could not see them, I somehow knew they
wereextraterrestrials. This environment consisted of a projection of a
diagram whichseemed alive and whose parts were active. There, I saw four
parts of technology:
- A rotor turning at a speed close to the speed
of light, insidea container.
- A super-conductive network which formed a part
of the airframecell, and the internal connections.
- A peripheral torus (ringof circular section) in
which something circulated that was probably plasmatic in nature, in a
closed loop and at very high speed.
- A crystal in the centre which shone powerfully
and tuned thefrequencies of the device.
Here is the simplified diagram:
Along with this vision, there was some strange information:
- Time is intermittent (not linear).
- It is a "sub-state" of matter.
- Vehicles can come from the "FUTURE" as fromthe "PAST" .
- They navigate the crystal either "mechanically",or "psychically" (possible
appearance of human interference inthis last case).
The pilot of the vehicle manipulates two commands :
a. a frequency (mega-wave of the CRYSTAL)
b. an "energy trajectory"
The torus provides the temporal coherence to the craft.The crystal gives the
wave coherence (in the field produced by the torus andwithin the physical
limits of the airframe unit. The appearance of the variableforce field
around the craft locally precedes the craft (a sort of projection ofspace-time).
The rotating disc is extremely light. The initial rotation of thedisc is
supplied by the torus. The disc then restores its energy to the torusonce
the threshold of a certain speed is exceeded. The vacuum is the key in
the"mutation" of the state of matter, and hence its "location".
VERY IMPORTANT: the vibratory level (consciousness) of thepilot and the
occupants is crucial (risk of accidental decorporation leavingthe body,
What is important to remember in this experience, what Iqualify as an
encounter of the fifth kind, is that communication was made bytelepathy. The
information is immediate, powerful and more-than-real. It is noteasy to
translate it with simple words as our state of consciousness is soexpanded
at those moments.
This close encounter of the fifth kind, or CE5, providedme with technical
information of great importance. It is common but often badlyinterpreted by
those to whom it happens as is often the case with extrasensoryperceptions.
To these technical aspects, it is necessary to add this :
- UFOs master the technologies of time and anti-gravity.
- Those UFOs said to be ' psychic ', are of the same
nature as the material UFOs but in a different state.
- The UFO phenomenon is of extraterrestrial origin.
- There are numerous extraterrestrial races.
- Among these races, few have come to visit us.
- Among these, some have a luminous and altruistic purpose,others do not.
- There will be an extraterrestrial threat when we havemastered time.
- This threat is related to our belligerent behaviour.
- Fraternity of people should become international.
- This threat will be lessened by collaboration with thebenevolent entities.
ACTE II : 3-D TIME.
A strange phenomenon occurred on March 7th, 2002, quitelate (11.30 pm)
on a Thursday evening in the house where we lived on the islandof Reunion.
While I slept, my wife heard an intense noise followed immediatelyby the
barking of the dogs in the area (a quiet country area). This noisesounded
very similar to what she had heard during her UFO experience near Gap(France)
like a wire spinning very quickly with sudden banging or crackingsounds. The
sound was so loud that she thought at once of a helicopter which wasgoing to
crash down on us. However, the "volume" of the noise was sogreat that it was
far louder than the blades of a helicopter. So she wasexpecting a terrible
crash but it didn't happen. The sound rapidly disappeared.She went to look
through the window but no neighbour showed the slightestmovement. Then the
My wife told me all this the next morning at about 11:00.
I got up at 4:30 and began writing for three hours. Infact, the visions
which I had had in 1990 resumed their intensity inunderstanding without the
actual images being seen. I felt a compelling order topass on this
New information reached me some of which is going todrastically change our
vision of the world and the equations of the physicists.It gives a
prodigious coherence to all UFO and paranormal phenomena:
The unit of time expands or contracts!
Parallel universes are nothing other than a different flow of time.
In fact, time possesses three dimensions ! It's not easy to read what
follows without a good dose of concentration because it is a little bit
difficult. But if it were easy to get out of the matrix we would have
already learnt how to do it. So here is the triple nature of time :
THE DIRECTION OF TIME: Dir-Time.
Direction of the flow of time. It is the sequenceof
time that establishes the relation between causes and effects. In a
trivialway, it is the arrow of time.
It describes the visible transformation of matter andevents. The direction
of time is not linear but intermittent. The direction oftime has two
directions that can be represented by a graph axis of a function.The most
acceptable is therefore the natural arrow of time going from past to
future. The seconddirection goes from the future towards the past. This one
is more difficult tointerpret because it occurs beyond a definite rate of
flow (see the density below). The keyword ofDir-Time is:
transformation . It is therefore the direction of thevariation of the
time units during an exchange of information or a movement.
Unit of time: temporal quantum ( Qt). Notion introducedin September,
THE DENSITY OF TIME: D-Time.
Fluidity of the flow of time. It is the relative
quantity of time thataffects the behaviour of matter and events. It
describes their speed oftransformation.
The density of time is not linear but intermittent,therefore fractal. It
implies that events are more or less numerous inquantities of time that are
defined by convention. In other words, in a densityof time D, there
are fewer'bits' of information than in a density D+1.D-time can be
represented by a graphic axis describing the passage from onedensity to
another. The keyword of D-Time is: speed (of
transformation).It is a quantity of time units during an exchange of
information or a movement.It is also extended as the possible quantity of
information or the quantity ofmovement per conventional unit of time (second).
The temporal density is the keyof the science of tomorrow.
It is necessary to understand that in one second, there isa variable
quantity of units of time. The higher the density of time, the higherthe
number of quantas of time (we'll come back to this later on). But all
thedensities of time are flowing at the same time, including in the past and
thefuture which should not be confused with the transmitted information. The
moretemporal density there is, the farther one goes in the past and future.
THE PRESENT OF TIME: P-Time.
The alignment of the Quantas in the harmonic frequencies. The
variation of P-Time affects the cyclic character of events when they
returnto their initial point. The Present does not depend either on the
direction oron the Density of time but it is the link between them. It is a
common number ofunits of time between different time densities during a
transformation in abalanced state. One passes from one density to another
thanks to the present. The keyword hereis : permanence
The present such as we usually conceive it does not exist !It is an illusion
and a convention of language. It will always be only a past oran immediate
future up to the time of Planck (10-43 second) becauseit is only
a problem of scale. This big truth is to be meditated upon for a longtime.
For a very long time.
To summarize, 3-D time is a hologram in which ourconsciousness evolves by
successive jumps in three simultaneous directions. Farfrom being unfounded
and speculative, 3-D time is scientifically verifiable.Besides, it is what
we do every day thanks to computer technology ! But in my experience the
intellectual side only came after...
Here are the sketches that I hurriedly drew at 4.30that morning:
The hourglass suggests perfectly the density of time.Every graduation
represents a temporal density. To simplify, we could say that adensity
superior to the conventional "second" would be afraction of
this second during which as many things (actions)would
Let us remain on the question of the density of time, theessential key of
our fate whether scientific or spiritual. Moreover, would itnot be the ring
of their marriage, the Ark of the Covenant ?
Future fate or destiny is partially"visible" for those who can
experience precognition. One willretort that it is necessary to wait for the
event to take place to declare thatthere was premonition. We may note in
passing that the only work ofscientists is indeed to
describe what is going to take place with the aid ofequations ! They
can only be sure when it has effectively taken place butthey know beforehand
what will happen, with a small percentage of uncertainty.The same as with
clairvoyants ! It is this "tiny" distance betweenpremonition and fact that
leaves room for the ..quantum ..free will. Thedifficulty comes from the fact
that this percentage of uncertainty increases ASTHE DEGREE OF LIBERTY of the
What decides if it takes place or not? Freedom ! Thehigher
the degree of freedom a creature has, even more so with time, the less itis
restricted. It is likely that it did not escape you that
thepredictability of mineral phenomena was superior to that of plants,
exceedinggreatly that of human beings. I'll leave you to meditate on what
follows on fromthat outburst.
Allow me a convenient digression here. Scientific methodis founded on the
reproducibility of a phenomenon, at first by the experiment,then by the
modelling of the causes generated. So equations are born with whichwe
describe the universe. But always, the experiment precedes the model (exceptin
pure mathematics). When an equation is officially proposed it has
beenclosely observed and examined so as not to be contradicted.
The equation doesnot describe reality, it describes what is
Einstein followed Newton without removing anything fromhim but situating him
in a relative context. It is what is proposed here.
Thedensity of time allows all the equations to be considered relatively.
But what happens with the increasing degrees of freedom ?Should we remain
with the "reproducibility" of scientific fact, thatprinciple which issued
from the philosophy of the 'Enlightenment' of the 18thcentury ? Are not we
in the 21st century ? Have we not understood thatincreasing
degrees of freedom and reproducibility are incompatible ?
The factor " t " (for time) is often represented in anorthonormed
line by one of the axes of an equation. The speed, then theacceleration are
described with the same unit of time -the second. Now, he who measures
decides on the unit of time because he is theobserver. In this way, we vary
the distance (and the speed of transformation ofit) and not the time to
quantify them. But a new paradigm has appeared in orderto study mechanics
and its relativist effects. To make a quantum jump (withoutthe pun), it is
necessary to introduce the notion of density of time and
totransform this sacred linearity into intermittent values whenever
we plungeinto matter to try and understand the nature of it. The results in
energycalculations will be heavily affected.
The corpuscular/wave duality of matter is at the heartof
this new paradigm.
When an UFO flies away, it appears to us asterrific acceleration. But
it is just an appearance! Whatever the physicalmake-up of the occupants of
these machines, they could not undergo suchlightning acceleration without
injury. It is not therefore "variable spaces"that must be studied, but
"variable time" . For example: if theacceleration of
an object appears to us to be 100m / s2, (330ft/s2) it isreally, for
the occupants, 10m/s2 (33ft/s2) because their seconds changedensity.
In other words, the first of their seconds will be the same as ours,then the
next one will dilate to become one of our minutes, and so on, so thatin fact,
it accelerates very little. But the illusion which we have is
afantastic acceleration until their disappearance into another density of
time,thus making them invisible for us AS WE ARE FOR PLANTS WHEN WE PASS IN
FRONT OFTHEM WITHOUT STOPPING.
Note : the information according to which energybecomes a vector in a three-dimensional
time comes from Roland Lehouc,astrophysicist in the astrophysics dept. of
the CEA (ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY).
These two curves represent the absolute and relativeexpansion of time,
in other words the creation and the
creature (whoperceives the creation).
The three dimensions of space (length, height, depth) andthe three
dimensions of time (direction, density, present) form the dualperfection of
creation. The relation between one and the other
represents evolution . Beings migrate therefore
through space-times in a brilliantgenius of fractal geometry.
Nobody will have ignored that the symbol of the pyramid,common to
several distant civilisations of the past, in a three-dimensionalapproach,
for space as well as time, is a singular coincidence. Also, would notthe two
inverted triangles represent a "powerful" six-sided starhiding perhaps an
esoterical meaning that was understood a long time ago ? OurUFOs don't seem
to have appeared just yesterday, especially if they were aroundat the origin
of these symbols. Is not the Apocalypse (also) Disclosure?
UFOs pass from one temporal density to another. One of thefundamental
points of the experience was this vision of the four states ofmatter which
dematerialises as the frequencies increase. A crystalline sound isemitted to
allow the passage towards the invisible state.
The dynamic behaviour of a UFO which crosses space-timecan go from
invisibility to materialisation. But it is not always the case.Furthermore,
our technologies, radar notably, interfere and sometimes provokefurtive
Two major reasons would explain the multiplication of UFOssightings in
the last fifty years.
1)The use of nuclear weapons - a real temporal seism for other beings, so
attractingthem towards us.
2) The use of sophisticated technologies by human beings that employ
emissions of high
frequencies at high energy. Contrary to all expectations,this contributes to
the general rise of the vibratory frequency of the planet.The real problem
is the chaotic character of these emissions. We are thereforein a stage of
ACTE III : THE GLOBAL EXPLANATION.
At this stage, I should say that I am pressing on ratherboldly with my
reflections. What follows is an attempt to formalise theseconcepts.
Naturally, whole areas of research are open to all and open scientificminds
will find substance in this new discipline to interpret into theirlanguage :
Chronotics . (Term inspired by Thierry Archer).
Time is an enigma! To us it seems linear. The pastprecedes the present which
precedes the future. How then can people perceivethe future
Is this not a "nasty" problem forscience to attempt to explain this
phenomenon ? But it's not examples that arelacking. Really, every day on
Earth, human beings perceive the future inpremonitory dreams or various "flashes".
The question is far morecomplex and eminent than any regulation of a nuclear
power station or geneticmanipulation. I repeat the question to those that
might not have heard it : Howcan the future precede the
We all know of Plato's cave*:(*In this legend, people living insidea cave
think that their shadows are real, when in fact they are produced by
thelight from the outside of their 'world' coming through a small hole.)
And if time was only the shadow of what it seems to be ?
What is time such as we usually understand it ?
There are two types of time: measurable time andpsychological time.
Measurable time is objective !
It is a universal agreement! It is an interval between two"phenomena":
before/after. In science, we use the second. It has itsmultiples and its
subdivisions. This time exists ! It is very useful toorganize lots of things
and for equations.
Psychological time is subjective!
Sometimes, a certain experience will seem to us to havelasted one minute in
certain circumstances, and in others, ten minutes, etc. Now,by agreement,
measured time will determine the average time and will fix in
ourconsciousness the acceptable proportions. 80 % of our life is calibrated
topsychological time. Curiously, we are capable of waking up at 6 o'clock
exactly,if we make the effort to will it to happen. This "coincidence" is
called by the term of "internal clock". Nobody has ever seen it butit is
accepted, thereby adding a little more weight to our arguments.Psychological
time is said to be subjective because it seems imaginary !But has anyone
ever wondered how such a widespread thing the imagination,does not exist
in itself ?
I would add that certain cycles and chronobiology are atthe intersection of
both times and give substance to what follows.
Here is what Roland Lehouc1] ( Astrophysicistin the dept. of
astrophysics of the CEA (ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY)) says: "Weperceive time
as one-dimensional, because our thoughts seem to succeed one afterthe other
in a well defined order. This argument is subjective. Time could seemone-dimensional
without it being so really, a little as we lose our sight ofrelief by
closing an eye: we are then surrounded with flat objects and, onlyhabit
enables us to appreciate distances "
Farther on: "Withthree dimensions of time and one dimension of space,
only tachyons, particleswhich go faster than the light, would exist "
Then: "Numerous aspects of physics would be rather different with time
which is notone-dimensional. For example, energy would no longer be just a
number, but avector indicating the temporal direction of movement, in the
same way as theamount of movement of a mobile is a vector indicating in
which spatial directionit is moving.
As the amount of movement is conserved when the mobile issubjected to no
force, the temporal direction taken would also be a constant ofmovement. In
other words, if two observers who are moving according to differenttemporal
directions meet, they will inevitably separate to follow theirrespective
temporal trajectory, incapable of staying together. From the point ofview of
an observer, the other one would appear and then disappear immediately " (NDA:
as UFOs do)
Then again: "Another important consequence of temporal
multidimensionality: certainparticles would no longer be stable. In a world
such as ours, a particle cansplit only if the sum of the masses at rest (the
mass when the particleis immobile) of the particles produced is lower than
the mass at rest of theinitial particle. This condition, which gives
stability to the proton andelectron, disappearsin a world of more than one
temporal dimension. For example, a proton coulddisintegrate into a neutron,
a positron and a neutrino; an electron could betransformed into a neutron,
an antiproton and a neutrino. The matter that weknow would no longer be
(Ed.: it is exactly the vision of the states of matterthat I had. (see frame
Just as there is equivalence between mass and energy,
thereis an equivalence between space and time. It expresses itself in
a simpleway. The principle of simplicity of Occkam's razor says that it is
the simplestexplanation that is best. But when it is a question of linking
the theory ofrelativity and quantum theory, we see a mountain of complexity
before us. Ithink, and this is fundamental, that the more
space there is, less there isof time, and inversely , less there is
of space more there is of time. It isprecisely the key that elegantly weds
the infinitely big and infinitely small.The difficulty is to understand the
nature of time to be convinced of it.
Jean Heidmann, astrophysicist at the origin of the SETIproject, declared
that the Big Bang was not an explosion of matter but anexpansion of space.
This difference often cast confusion in many minds. In thelight of 3-D time,
and in particular, one of its dimensions, the density oftime, the expansion
of the universe is just an appearance. As a reminder, theexpansion of the
universe would be due to a considerable differential betweenthe
thermodynamic forces tending to repel matter and the nuclear forces which,on
the contrary, attract it.
The dilemma comes from the fact that 90 % of the mass ofthe universe remains
hidden. This observation comes from the differencecalculated between the
thermodynamic forces and the forces of atomic cohesion.So the entropic
movement would be just an illusion. Yet another. In fact, thereis no choice
but to admit that all space-times coexist. The Big Bang is a dogmain the
sense that it is perfectly arbitrary to think that the original
soupaccumulated into huge masses, and galaxies, stars and into planets. If,
as is itsuggested in this case, matter would be on the surface of the
membrane of acosmic balloon why would it not be evenly spread out? We are
told that gravityis the reason! Now, we do not know the real nature of
gravity except that it isa curvature of space-time. Hence, the idea that
gravity is related to thedensity of time and in no way explains the
formation of celestial bodies. Thefurther we look into space ( weaker time
density) the more we see the outerlayers of the universe. But also the
further we look, the further we see intothe past (going back in the
direction of time). And in this case we see theinternal layers of the
universe. Therefore, the combination between externallayers and internal
layers reveals entropy to be an illusion.
When we look at a star (because of its matter), weperceive an "internal"
layer of the universe which is translated by acurvature of space-time, or in
other words, according to my vision, a "superior"(higher) space-time
compared to the space-time which surrounds it. In this way,the star is not
in the same position as its spatial environment. Black holes arein a much
higher density of time and it is impossible for us to see them in ourspace-time
since we guess them by calculations.
If it is relatively easy to conceive, at an astronomicalscale, that by
contraction of space-time we have a difference of positionbetween a star and
its environment, it is less obvious that it's the same casewith the
infinitely small because specific laws happen there, said to becounter-intuitive.
Yet there is a sign that should guide us. The space betweenthe nucleus and
the electrons is, proportionally to their sizes, an abyss ofspace (emptiness).
In reality, the universe is fractal, i.e. there are scale"jumps" within
which particular (related) laws of functioninggovern each particular space-time.It
is the case with quarks, atoms, molecules, cells, organs, bodies, groups
ofbodies and groups of groups which are in themselves as many space-times.
We livein the middle of a skilfully baked (wafered) cream slice. Far from me
the ideato evoke here the Great Confectioner. You are the only judge to
appreciate theend purpose of it. My purpose is to point out the common
feature of these scales,or these layers : the wave-like character of these
demonstrations.. i.e.these vibrations, because everything is vibration.
Matter has a corpuscular/ wave duality. It is exactly in the passage from
one to another, of theparticle to the wave, that the increase of the density
of time happens, with aloss of mass (neutrinos, photons, electrons, tachyons),
in the process. Here too,there has been confusion since the time of Newton.
Mass is not gravityeven if the effects in nature give us the illusion
of it in our time density.Mass is related to the forces of cohesion. One of
the biggest enigmas in physicsis the difference in scale between strong,
weak and electromagnetic interactionson the one hand, and gravity on the
other. As a reminder, gravity is 1040less strong than strong
Einstein demonstrated, thanks to Riemann's works (non-Euclidian geometry),
that gravity is geometrical in nature. Actually,gravity is strictly related
to space-times. Moreover, it goes through thembecause it participates in
their modification. Gravity increases as does thedensity of time. It is also
induced, in the electromagnetic forces. The queen ofvibrations is the
electromagnetic wave whose spectrum has such an astronomicalnumber of
frequencies that it makes your head swim.
Matter is seething with frequencies, even in lowtemperatures. At zero Kelvin
degree, states of matter change, (functionofstatein quantum mechanics). Now,
the rotor of aUFO "orbits" in a vacuum at absolute zero degree!
We are beginning to come out of the matrix. You reallyhave to get out of the
observer's position to understand that what seems to usto be on the same
plane - an apple and a stone forexample - are absolutely not so. We see them
as suchbecause we belong to a "superior" (higher) space-time. In fact, we
arejust on the border because, naturally, superior time densities of time
aremixing with us for whom we are "physically" merged with the apple, orthe
worm which is inside. What happens when we observe by means of a
microscopewith a tunnel effect ? We observe "superior" space-times just as
the astronomer sees "lower" space-times with his telescope.The difference
which we attribute to both is the apparent proportion ofobjects.
This proportion is totally subjective ! We set up asa truth the idea that
this thing is bigger and that thing is smaller. Even if itis true in our
reality, it is a total illusion! We are comparing incomparableobjects, each
belonging to its own space-time. How can we imagine the idea thatan elephant
has of its own size ? Any human observation is subjectivebecause it proceeds
from an intrinsic anthropocentrism, (a human point of view).A comparative
analysis is a reduction of our intellect, as much for space as fortime.
Besides, our culture and our behaviour cause us to continually
makejudgements.Measuring instruments themselves are not to blame. It is the
interpretation ofthe results, stemming from an artefact belonging to a
particular space-time,that plunges and locks us inside the matrix. We
attempt irresistibly but in vainto extricate ourselves from an environment
to which we belong !
Why do all electromagnetic waves travel at the speed oflight ? For the
simple reason that because of their own space-time,our instruments cannot
measure anything else !
One of these erroneous interpretations, in myopinion, is the constant of the
speed of light. How do we know that it isconstant ? By measuring it in our
space-time. Indeed, we measure it withinour frame of reference. Now, in the
same time, if I may say so, we ourselveshave never experienced even half of
this speed. In other words, we do not knowwhat our perception would be, even
with instruments, of this other frame ofreference. What is speed, and more
still - acceleration, if it is not amodification of space-time ? Remember
that Einstein indicated that the moreone approaches the speed of light, the
more time expands. In this case, onceagain according to my vision, space
contracts. So speed is immediate datain a frame of reference, we may say
thatspeed itself is the reference,whereas acceleration, when it is
highenough, is a transfer from one space-time to another. Our technologies
are stilltoo weak in order to realise this. There is an intersidereal gaping
hole betweenan acceleration of 10 m/s2 and an acceleration of 100
000m / s2( See particle accelerators below). It is exactly one of
the functions of therotor seen in the dream and which had lightning
Another little effort ! The recognition of theStrange is within reach of
seconds and of Angstroms. In matter, light is "braked" by the various space-times
which constitute the electronic levels.
To avoid a long description of the states of matter, Ishall just present
a few essential points
· Every electronic level has its own time density of
which corresponds to the space between the nucleusand the electron. The time
density of matter is therefore the average ofthese densities.
· The more electronic levels there are, more the globaldensity of time is
weak but the potential energy (number of electrons) is big.So,
gravity is due to the total value of
electronic space-times. Gravity of the big masses comes from the
total number of atoms concerned, (themselvesconsisting of a multitude of
· The greater the density of time, more the energy is
immediatelyavailable with a minimum of energy to obtain it by the
appearance of quantasof time. Hence, the possibility of an
output superior to 1 .Free energy could result from this explanation.
· Potential energy increases as the distance (space)and
as the opposite of the density of time. Kinetic energy
increases asthe density of time (therefore a decrease ofspace).
· The increase of time density comes from the decreasingof
these spaces. The more levels there are, the more one can harness
· Quantum vacuum is represented by these spaces from
which onedraws energy . The increase of time density
comes from the decrease in thedistance between electronic levels.
· How does one decrease electronic space?
By compression (need of energy = radial vector:explosive
method) or by vortex in a vacuum (high speed
rotation =tangential vector: gentle and progressive method) that cause
quantas oftime to appear. Isotopes
are transformed into energy.
· Gravity is strong for big masses (e.g. the Earth)because they have many
particles. The same thing can be obtained with a smallamount of matter by
reducing the space between the nucleus and the electrons.The distance (=
temps ) is the factor of conversion of gravity.
Once again, the measurements should take into account thedifferences in
scale. We are therefore proposing a new theory :
AbsoluteRelativity ! It can be expressed as follows :
information structuresspace-time, and conversely.
ACT IV : TEMPORAL QUANTAS & VIBRATIONS.
Here we introduce the notion of temporal quantas which wasinspired long
after the experience of March, 2002. A quantum of time is thesmallest grain
of indivisible time. It has a value, as a first estimate, of 10-44second,
or below the time of Planck. Let us consider three frequencies belongingto
three different densities of time and place quantas of time on these waves.
In developing temporal quantas,one can measure the differences of
density. One crosses from one density toanother by the line (axis) of the
present, that is through the points ofvibratory harmonics. To represent the
Present (P-Time) in a geometrical way,imagine if one second were the
distance of the Earth from the Sun, the Presentwould not even be visible
with the best microscope in the world. It is not sosurprising that we can
miss billions of temporal quantas every second. It iswith this that the
importance of psychological time can be realised, the same aswith dreams, a
state signifying a vibratory increase.
It is essential tounderstand that every quantum of time is a bearer of
information in thespace-time that it occupies. The energy and the "messages" thatare
there are going to circulate from quantum to quantum, making bigger jumps
inweaker densities. The more the quantas are spaced out
(low frequencies) themore the law of cause and effect will
prevail (as with karma). That is whyquantum physics, in certain
circumstances does not know what is the effect orthe cause of quantum states
with the same name. Once established on very highfrequencies, and
circulating far enough towards one or the other arrows of time(direction),
as a part of ourselves is able to do, we can see the past (distantmemory) or
just as UFOs can. This law of liberty explains not onlythe
difference between nature worlds (mineral, vegetal, animal and human),but
also the confrontation between science andspirituality. Do we not say that
there are "hard", or "pure"sciences (very reliable=less freedom) and "soft",
or "human"sciences (more uncertain = high freedom)
By simultaneouslyincreasing energy in two different time densities,
there are proportionally moretemporal quantas missing in the lower time
The universe, in all itsrealities, is a succession of ranges of
frequencies corresponding to differentdensities of time (so, different space-times).
ACT V: UFOS AND OTHER MYSTERIES EXPLAINED
Concerning more particularly UFOs, we will try to explain them in the
light of 3-D Time. Here is an incomplete list of additional effects that may
find a new global coherence.
The prodigious accelerations are illusory: the unit of time
Not only the acceleration of UFOs, seen from the outside,is an illusion
due to a differential of temporal density, but it is also animaginary
reduction of its size, giving us even more so the impression that theyare
far away. Would they decrease to the size of a ball of light in a cropcircle?
- The observations vary from ghostly to very material:
the state ofmatter changes.
- UFOs disappear on the spot: the rotation of the rotor
expands timewithout changing position.
- The environment undergoes a 'sucking up' (lifting) phenomenon:
astrong local gravity takes place.
- Photos of UFOs are often vague: intermediate density
- UFOs are furtive: radar detection depends on immediate
- Perception of dimensions is relative: vessels are
bigger inside andsmaller outside. ETs vary in size
according to their appropriatedensity.
- The saucer shape is the most efficient: economy of
matter isdetermined by the radius of the ring.
- A beam of light attracts objects: the gravitational
beam is guidedby a field.
- UFOs change shape: the 4 states exist at the same time
in the craft.
- Witnesses are attracted by a light which then gets bigger: moment
whichprecedes the materialisation.
- ETs can choose the witnesses: a psychic emission
inhibitsperceptions and conversely. (Perceptions can be enhanced)
- Some abductees have missing time: the missing Time
is noother than a different time density.
- Microwave traces are often found in places of UFO landings.
Theysignify a materialisation. With adequate means, we could maybe
measureX-rays and gamma rays of the luminous sightings:
the physical tracesdepend on the phase of "materialisation".
We can, of course apply 3-D Time to paranormal phenomena.
- Telepathy : transfer of psychic waves to a
temporal level givingthe appearance of simultaneity.
- Speed of thought: a part of ourselves is
situated in anotherdensity of time.
- Ghosts and ectoplasms: intermediate states of
- Dreams: change of density during the night. The
dreams seemextremely short and contain nevertheless many details.
- Retro precognition : break of partial temporal
density and slidingalong the axis of direction.
- Telekinesis and poltergeist s: variation of the
density in theenvironment.
Science also has its mysteries. Here are a few suggestions.
- Loss of information from black holes: high
gravity rhymes withhigh temporal density.
- Arbitrary nature of physical constants : they
are valid only in ourdensity.
- Very weak gravity compared to the other forces
: proportional tothe temporal density.
- Heisenberg's uncertainty: impossibility to
measure the positionand also the quantity of movement of a particle
because of a break of the flowof time in the experiment.
- Inseparability of particles: paradox between
theexperience of thought EPR (Einstein-Podolski-Rosen),confirmed by
the theorem of Bell, and the experience of Aspect demonstrating thecounter
intuitive nature of quantum mechanics. The quantas of non-visibletime
pass on the information of the particle properties in the form of waves.
- Disappearance of particles in particle accelerators:
these partially fulfil the role of the torus of UFOs. Particles
disappeartowards the geometrical centre of the particle accelerators (density
of time +gravity).
This list of elements can be completed at your leisure.There are things
which don't come to mind easily. So, all those who areinterested in the laws
that govern the universe or if they are not yet convincedor if they are
simply curious can meditate upon it in order to attempt anotherexcursion out
of the matrix, for there is nothing more extraordinary than toexperience it
(I reply to a person whocontacted me after reading the document above. He
asked what proof or evidencecould be found to illustrate the theory).
For the question of proof and evidence, I have given a fewideas at the end
of the article mentioning black holes, particleaccelerators and quantum
enigmas. Our problem today is that we are limited, if Iremember well, to a
time scale of 10-15 second to observe theinfinitely small (we are
waiting for 10-18 sec. laser beams to bedeveloped), and we even
interpret what we 'see' without being sure of thepertinence of the
interpretation. You know as I do that the time of Planck (10-43second)is
a mathematical deduction. We are therefore only halfway there, so to speak.
The problem with the interpretation of gravity in theinfinitely small, based
on general relativity, comes from the fact that thescales are very different
in terms of 'distance' and also in number of atoms.
The difference in scale between gravity and the otherinteractions (1040
higher for strong interactions), is surprising andis a problem. If, as
I suppose, the reduction in distance between the nucleusand electronic
levels really generates gravity, until we are better informed, weare
incapable of measuring this distance in our quantum experiments since it
isdifficult to provoke this 'compression' (reduction of electronic distances)
andat the same time measure this gravitational distance because of the
explosivemethod used (high energy laser beam bombarding an atom). We neither
have themeans nor the time to do it (phenomena too fast). However, according
to some, weshould be able to verify it or not, with the future LHCof the
CERN (2007) (particleaccelerator), if mini black holes appear under certain
conditions. As I see it,it would be useful to study the theory of Dr. Ning
Lee of l'UAH (Alabama) thatshows the apparition of antigravity phenomena in
spinning electromagnetic fields,and also Dr Podkletnov's experiment, even if
controversial, which gave an ideaof it (loss of 2% of the mass of 'objects'
found above a rotor producing aspinning field.).
In fact, to my mind, antigravity is a differential ofgravity comparative to
the mass involved (number of atoms) and not an 'opposing'force. In an case,
what is a space-time anti-curvature ?
Quantum mechanics gives us intuitive proof of theexistence of 'non apparent'
quantas of time (supposed to be in very high timedensities) on a plate. The
whole QM is built on a basic principle: statefunctions attribute discrete
states (spin, charge and mass) to particles, i.e.jumps in their state. It is
precisely the definition of quantum states. Hasanyone ever explained these
discontinuities ? No, we are content to observe them.What happens between
two quantum states, which, at the same time bring aboutspatial modifications
? Nobody knows !
I sense that it is here, that the dematerialisation ofmatter happens-
instantaneous certainly-but dematerialisation just the same.
When you consider this apparent 'absurdity' and ourtemporary inability (let's
hope so) to 'see' below 10-15 second (tobe converted in
wavelengths), you can also deduce that matter BECOMES INVISIBLEbecause it
dematerialises, while the wave-like nature of matter keeps the 'memory'of
the particle properties (theory of super-cords and inseparability
ofparticles). We will see further on how the coherence of atomic structures
isconserved even in the case of dematerialisation.
From this comes the idea that UFOs, are transformed fromparticle to wave,
once a certain rate of time flow is reached at the peripheryof the rotor!
The emission of a breaking frequency that I spoke of in theprevious article,
describing access to invisibility, i.e. to dematerialisation,would be the
missing key. It should be born in mind that for me, invisibility,as for
light, does not mean that matter has totally disappeared but that it haslost
its mass and consequently, there is no inertia which prevents high speeds.
This breaking frequency should be found, with thenecessary energy, a little
below (in terms of wavelength) the threshold ofpresent 'visibility', meaning
when converted into frequencies, around 100,000gigahertz, as we will see. It
is interesting to note that light, which has afrequency between 4 and 7.5 1014
hz, happens to be at the limit ofwhat we see of the infinitely small
today. Now, I state in the article that thethird state of matter is
luminescent before invisibility (the first beingstable, the second being
unstable). Before concluding anything as such, orgetting carried away with
such an easy temptation, we have to imagine thefrequency of a rotor spinning
at very high speed. Besides the fact that thisrotor isn't braked by its
environment (vacuum chamber), besides the fact thatpurely inert gyroscopic
effects hold it in an extremely stable spatialreferential, inducing even
within itself an 'antigravity' phenomenon (Frisbeeeffect), besides the fact
that there is no contact with any other matter in itscentre since it would
be emptied (pointless and even the existence ofconstraints in the case of a
full hub), besides the fact that it produceselectromagnetic fields at high
energy, the rotor is a marvellous emitter offrequencies.. relayed by the
Let us make a hypothesis. A rotor diameter of 5 meters,the circumference is
15.7 meters. At 3000 000 000 meters/second (speed oflight), the supposed
speed limit (we will speak of the dilemma of infiniteenergy for an infinite
mass later on), our frequency is about 19 megahertz (or19 million rotations/second).
It is extremely weak in terms of frequency butvery high in rps.
Remember that Podkeltnov's rotor turned at 5000 r.p.m,that is 230000 times
slower for a ten times smaller size. On the other hand, bydoubling our rotor
by another which turns in the opposite direction and byhaving hundreds of
segments of radial magnets on the two rotors one on top ofthe other, the
radial magnets having a thickness for example of one centimetrein
circumference, we obtain: 15700x19=298300 Mhz that we multiply again by
15700(second rotor) that is a frequency of: 4683310000 Ghz, i.e. nearly 4.6
milliongigahertz. That is one bit of information every 4.6 10-18
You 'just' need to reduce this figure by a factor of ahundred (i.e. 1% of
the speed of light) to realise that we reach ten times ourpresent
observation limit. Therefore, our progress in means of measurements
willrapidly confirm or invalidate this hypothesis of material disappearance
andprove the reality of time quantas. And since we are only at 1% of the
speed oflight, the energy needed doesn't greatly increase the mass of atoms
of therotor. The explosion of the rotor, that could be envisaged due to
thecentrifugal force thus generated, could be avoided by the structure
itself (purity),of the material used and the action of the torus spoken of
below. Finally,according to my vision, with the atoms transforming into
waves after a certainvibratory threshold (see above for the breaking
frequency), the corpuscularnature of atoms no longer has to be maintained as
it is, and this happeningprogressively from the periphery to the centre of
the rotor as it accelerates (therotor would therefore diminish before your
eyes), at the same time, emitting apowerful light (what we see in the centre
of the underside of saucers).
For the rest of the craft, we can suppose that the crystal(type of quartz)
aligns the harmonic frequencies. It is understood, and you mustnot forget
that by increasing the frequencies, you increase the appearance oftime
quantas in the theory that we are interested in, increasing at the sametime
the mass of accessible information, and consequently the energy which ismore
immediately available and which is linked to it, knowing, once again
thatspace contracts at the same time (present dilemma of the observation of
theinfinitely small). The most annoying, it must be confessed, is that the
more youlook into the infinitely small, precisely the more it becomes so (equivalencespace
This leads us to the Fermi paradox. He was absolutelyright in opposing the
idea of the hypothesis of the presence ofextraterrestrials on Earth, coming
from the confines of the universe, with thoseinsurmountable distances of the
cosmos, so long as we remain enclosed in anon-compressible space reference.
According to this paradox, either the ETs arealready here, or they can't in
any way be here. In the first case, we would havealready seen them, which
doesn't seem to be the case for him. In the light ofabsolute relativity
according to which, information structures space-time andvice versa, space
contracts as the density of time increases. For ETs, theuniverse is 'ridiculously'
small if they 'greatly' expand time. I imagine thatthey can't all do so,
through all the scales of expansion.. which would explain,among other things,
their very different behaviours (they are not all to be putin the same boat).
They can only appear to us if they decide to, i.e. only ifthey change space-time
by reducing their time density. This reduction can onlybe done at the cost
of a considerable loss of time quantas and therefore ofinformation by, you
guessed, a negative acceleration of the rotor. Theirmaterialisation is
therefore a form of 'sacrifice' of their degree of freedom (thisterm is
often attributed to avatars). One can understand why they don't rush toshake
our hands, in case we put theirs in handcuffs. Yet it is, I believe,
whatthey accept to do (sacrifice time quantas) to take 'samples' that are
moreeasily observed by this means, or more rarely, for direct physical
contacts withthose whom they know that there is no or little risk (psychic
and behaviourstudies). The less 'clever' among them are no doubt 'caught out'
by being seensometimes. It's a strong bet that the easiest thing for them is
to capture ourpsychic signals (high frequencies) and remain comfortably 'there'
where theyare. (Sorry for this digression).
To come back to astronomical distances, that are reputedto be insurmountable,
the Fermi paradox is probably the most simple amongparadoxes to be
challenged and understood since these distances (universe 15billions (U.S.)
light years away) have no value except in our space-time (seethe theory of
reversed triangles where, 'the more time there is, the less space').We have
known since 1905 (limited relativity) that space and time areinseparable. By
introducing three-dimensional time, the impact on space-timegeometry is
obvious, and the notion of time quantas clarifies this relation: foreach
appearance of a time quantum, a spatial 'quantum' disappears (for this
ideamust also be introduced). We could express this by tQ(time quantum) and
sQ (spacequantum). Then we would have an equation like: S tQ=1/S sQ. And
inversely, likethe relation that unites frequency and wavelength. This isn't
quite true in thesense that there is discontinuity. Therefore, this relation
can only be valid ina discrete function (discontinuous), (see the initial
text). In this case, wewould have a limit,where S is the sum, Sx tQ> 1/Sy eQ,
where x and y are twosigns of maximum space-time considered. Systematically,
we would define the Sx1,2.. n tQ and the Sy1,2
n sQ where n would be a
This new type of algebra must, it is true, be examined bymaths experts.
We said that the universe is fractal (scales of spacewithout linear
transitions). It's interesting, at least, to link the variationsof space and
time in each space-time. We could actually use the term"tension" for the
phenomena, where, in a particular space-time, we seea variation of time
quantas, and its consequences in mass/energy, in a samespatial referential (like
the one that we study in classical physics), orinversely with a same number
of time quantas for a variation of space. It's likethis that we have the
notions of potential and kinetic energies belonging toeach space-time (celestial
mechanics, classical mechanics, biology, chemistry,electronics, etc.). It
would probably be extremely tempting to compare thisnotion of "tension"
within the same space-time to that of Einstein's"tensor" which would
immediately see its applications multiplied by asmany discontinuous space-times.
I would just like to mention the nature of antimatter thatmany see as the
ideal energetic manna from heaven. Like Richard Feynman, aphysicist, who saw
in antimatter the expression of matter going backwards intime (reversed
arrow of time), I think this idea is quite probable.
Feynman has, it is true, since changed his mind. However,he didn't know the
three-dimensional theory of time very well to which we canadd the following
idea: beyond a certain flow of time (time density), thequantas are so close
to each other (because very numerous) that the informationcould circulate in
the opposite direction to the natural arrow of time in ourspace-time. This
reversed flow of information (mass/energy) 'normally' happensin the form of
waves, non-materialised by particles. There seems to be aboundary state of
matter, that is coherent and capable of going backwards likethis in time.It
is very brief (they speak of a millionthof a second).
Just as an electric current that flows, not physically (theelectrons only
move very little) but in a wave-like manner (transmission ofshocks), the
information (of the states of matter) can flow against the current,and be
compared to thermodynamic entropic sub-millimetric fluctuations.
We all know that below certain values, cause and effectare indiscernible in
Quantum Mechanics, in other words, the flow of time, whenit is very dense,
is going to influence the order of appearance of phenomenawithout being in
any way in contradiction with classical laws for they don'tbelong to the
same space-time. In classical mechanics, time quantas are veryspaced out and
matter followsdefined laws. On the other hand, in QM,matter follows
undefined laws, but.. statistical laws. We must remember that QMlogic is
counter-intuitive. Once three-dimensional time logicis accepted, its effects
will be largelyobvious. As a result, QM becomesmore intuitive again,
especially if weadd the notion of transport of information dear to Austrian
In this way, therefore, I make the hypothesis thatelectronic and proton
charges of our space-time could reflect the arrow of time,the arrow that is
followed by matter in some space-times including ours that arerestricted by
a too great a lack of time quantas, (counted in billions).
One could thus suppose, in a first estimate, thatantimatter is the
expression of matter that goes in the opposite direction, andthat one can
only control in a powerful electromagnetic field which prevents"two trains
from crashing on the same line", the magnetic field itselfnot having much to
do with time. It should be noted that the production ofantimatter, which is
in any case famous for its furtiveness, is ridiculouslyweak compared to the
surrounding matter (the record seems to be only 50,000atoms of antimatter
when there are billions of billions around it.
When matter meets antimatter, it produces a colossalamount of energy, since
in my opinion, it corresponds to the instantaneouscompression of two space-times
going in different directions (arrow of time)that annihilate themselves. One
could say that it's the energy of the Present,which, when it is reduced
usually to a single time quantum (when the wave passesby its neutral phase),
is very weak, or too fast (here, as well). In the case ofantimatter, we
could be dealing with packets of materialised Present, from thefact that a
relatively great number of quantas (which usually flow one after theother)
meet instantaneously, since in an opposite manner. In other terms, theyare
two vectors of energy (admissible in 3-D time) which crash headlong intoeach
Antimatter could be present in the torus of ufos !Protected by a powerful
electromagnetic field, even in a small quantity, itwould orbit at a
vertiginous speed and would serve two functions:
- maintain the temporal coherence of the particles of the ship (the
function of a particle accelerator).
- maintain the waves, inside the ship, once the matter has "dematerialised",forcing
them to perform 'on the spot' rather than lose themselves in spaceor in
the atmosphere. This phenomena could be explained by a"reverse" aligning
of the harmonics of the matter waves with theantimatter waves (the
sinusoids are mixed up, some in one direction, othersin another.) Being
contained within the craft, the particular properties ofthese waves would
be controlled.I admit that this aspect of things is very speculative for
the moment as it isone hypothesis on top of another.
Whatever the case, the issue of antimatter is a question of where it
comes from. The most exotic theories exist, for example that of parallel
universes, that would be "elsewhere", but where ? This vision of opposite
arrows of time seems to me to correspond to a coherent logic of the
intrinsic nature of a multi-dimensional universe that contains our own, and
doesn't put off indefinitely the discovery of other worlds, that are
inaccessible by definition.
Binary charges (positive/negative) correspond perfectly to the duality of
the Direction of time (Dir-Time="from the past to the future" and "from the
future to the past"). I think that the universe is very coherent and that
scientific understanding is not an empty notion. The dual three-dimensionality
of space and time seems to me to belong to the genius of Nature and what we
are invited to participate in.
In conclusion, I could say that matter is a "simple" affair of space-time
and energy-mass. Four pillars of the foundation of the universe !
The final question could be :what is the fifthelement ?
yazı/ resim izinsiz olarak kullanılamaz!! Telif hakları uyarınca
bu bir suçtur..! Tüm hakları Çetin BAL' a aittir. Kaynak gösterilmek şartıyla siteden
The Time Machine Project © 2005 Cetin BAL - GSM:+90 05366063183 -Turkiye/Denizli
Ana Sayfa /index /Roket bilimi /
E-Mail /CetinBAL/Quantum Teleportation-2
Time Travel Technology /Ziyaretçi
Defteri /UFO Technology/Duyuru
Kuantum Teleportation /Kuantum Fizigi
New World Order(Macro Philosophy)