Comments on the New Tesla
Electromagnetics

A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory
There are at least twentytwo major discrepancies presently existing in
conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presends a summary of
those
flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion of scalar
longitudinal
waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet
Tesla
Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1981 and 1982.
I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my friends
and
colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain anonymous. One of
the
two is an experimental genius who can produce items that do not work by
ortho
dox theory. The second is a master of materials science and
electromagnetics
theory. I thank them both for their exceptional contributions and
stimuli
regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics theory, and
their
forbearance with the many discussions we have held on this and related
subjects.
It goes without saying that any etrors in this paper are strictly my own,
and
not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.
(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are
falsely
made identical. Actually, on a charged particle, the "charge" is the
flux of
virtual particles on the "bare particle" of observable mass. The charged
part
icle is thus a "system" of true massless charge coupled to a bare
chargeless
mass. The observable "mass" is static, threedimensional and totally
spatial.
"Charge" is dynamic, fourdimensional or more, virtual and
spatiotemporal.
Further, the charge and observable mass can be decoupled, contrary to
present
theory. Decoupled charge  that is, the absence of mass  is simply
what we
presently refer to as "Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge
are all
identical. Rigorously, we should utilize any of these three as an "ether,"
as
suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see Max Born, Einstiein's
Theory of
Relativity, Revised Edition, Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p.
224). And
all three of them are identically anenergy  not energy, but more
fundamental
components of energy.
(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3dimensional
spatial
stress. Instead, it is the intensity of a manydimensional (at least
four
dimensional) virtual flux and a stress on all four dimensions of
spacetime.
This is easily seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is identically
masless
charged. (It is not "filled" with charge; rather, it is charge!) Just
as, in
a gas under pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further
stresses the
gas, the accumulation of charge (spacetime) stresses charge (spacetime).
Further, if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can flow
exclusively
in time, exclusively in space, or in any combination of the two. Tesla
waves 
which are scalar waves in pure massless charge flux itself  thus can
exhibit
extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do not possess.
And
Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom in which to move,
as
compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way to visualize a tesla scalar
wave is
to regard it as a pure oscillation of time itself.
(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic case,
or at
least thought of as "composed of the same thing." For that reason,
voltage is
regarded as "potential drop." This also is not true.
Rigorously, the potential
is the intensity of the virtual particle flux at a single point 
whether or
not there is any mass at the point  and both the pressure and the
point
itself are spatiotemporal (4dimensional) and not spatial (3dimensional)
as
presently assumed. Voltage represents the spatial intersection of the
difference in potential between two seperated spatial points, and always
implies at least a miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it
spatial!). "Voltage" is spatial and depends upon the presence of
observable
mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and
depends
upon the absence of observable mass flow. The two are not even of the
same
dimensionality.
(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in fact
it is
a very high value.
Vacuum has no mass, but it has great massless charge and
virtual particle charge flux. For proof that a charged vacuum is the
seat of
something in motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of
static
electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nature, Vol. 285, 15 May
1980, pp.
154155. In fact, vacuum IS charge, identically, and it is also
spacetime, and
at least fourdimensional.
(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in
its
context. A threedimensional spatial hole, for example, exists in time.
If we
model time as a dimension, then the spatial hole has one dimension in 4space.
So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence.
In the vacuum 4space, a
spatial nothing is still a something. The "virtual" concept and
mathematical
concept of a derivative are simply two present ways of unconsciously
addressing
this fundamental problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.
(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum) has
been
seperated into two parts. We can only think of a space as "continuing to
exist
in time."
To separate vacuum spacetime into two pieces, an operation is
continually required. The operator that accomplishes this splitting
operation
is the photon interaction, the interaction of vector electromagnetic
energy or
waves with mass. I have already strongly pointed out this effect and
presented
a "raindrop model" or firstorder physical change itself in my book, The
Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp.
128130.
(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of (and
connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it is a separate, fundamental
field
of nature and it can be entirely disconnected from the magnetic field.
See
Richard P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, AddisonWesley
Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 158 to 1514. Curiously,
this
fact has been proven for years, yet it has been almost completely
ignored in
the West. The "(triangle)x" operator, when applied to the Afield, makes
Bfield. If the (triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" Afield
possesses muchexpanded characteristics from those presently allowed in
the
"bound" theory. Specifically, it becomes a scalar or "shadow vector"
field;
it is not a normal vector field.
(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental constant
of
nature.
Instead it is a function of the intensity of the massless charge flux
(that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatic potential) of the vacuum
in
which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and masless charge are one and the
same,
one may say that the speed of light is a function of the intensity of
the
spatiotemporal vacuum!). The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the
vacuum,
the faster the speed of light in it. This is an observed fact and
already shown
by hardcore measurements. For example, distinct differences actually
exist in
the speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth
as
compared to measurements in space away from planetary masses. In a
vacuum on
the surface of the earth, light moves significantly faster. For a
discussion
and the statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of the
Velocity
of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics Journal, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp.
3742
(original in Russian, translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The
Russians have used this knowledge for over two decades in their
strategic
psychotronics (energetics) program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientist
is aware
of the measured variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western
scientists
simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!
(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In fact,
energy
arises from vector processes, and it can be disassembled into more
fundamental
(anenergy) scalar components, since the vectors can. These scalar
components
individually can be moved to a distant location without expending work,
since
one is not moving force vectors. There the scalar components can be
joined and
reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy" appearing at a
distance,
with no loss in between the initial and distant points. For proof that a
vector
field can be replaced by (and considered to be composed of) two scalar
fields,
see E. T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society,
Volume 1,
1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can be replaced by two
coupled
scalar waves.
(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of
energy
from a timevarying, electrically charged source.
In fact, an exact solution of
the problem does allow this longitudinal wave.
See T. D. Keech and J. F. Corum,
"A New Derivation for the Field of a TimeVarying Charge in Einsteins
Theory,"
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp.
6368
for the proof.
(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited, and
do
not permit the explicit consideration of the internal, finergrained
structures
of a vector or a scalar. That is, a fundamental problem exists with the
basic assumptions in the vector mathematics itself. The "space" of a
vector
field, for example, does not have internested sublevels (subspaces)
containing
finer "shadow vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has
already
discovered that electrical reality is built that way. Thus one should
actually
use a "hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Muses. A scalar
is
filled with (and composed of) nested levels of other "spaces" containing
vectors, where these sum to "zero" in the ordinary observable frame
without an
observable vector resultant. In Muses' mathematics, for example, zero
has real
roots. Real physical devices can be  and have been  constructed in
accordance with Muses' theory. For an introduction to Muses' profound
hypernumberss approach, see Charles Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein,
Communication, Ogranization and Science, The Falcon's Wing Press, Indian
Hills,
Colorado, 1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers:
Computational
Convepts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also
Charles
Muses' "Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation, Janurary
1978.
(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation of
energy
law is required. Let us recapitulate for a moment. The oldest law called
for
the conservation of mass. The present law calls for the conservation of
"mass
and energy", but not each separately. If mass is regarded as simply
another
aspect of energy, then the present law calls for the conservation of
energy.
However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental concept. Since
the
energy concept is tied to work and the movement of vector forces, it
implicitly
assumes "vector movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible
concept.
But as we pointed out, Whittaker showed that vectors can always be
further
broken down into more fundamental coupled scalar components. Further,
Tesla
discovered that these "coupled components" of "energy" can be
individually
separated, transmitted, processed, rejoined, etc. This directly implies
that
energy per se need not be conserved. The new law therefore calls for the
conservation of anenergy, the components of energy. These components may
be
coupled into energy, and the energy may be further compacted into mass.
It is
the sum total of the (anenergy) components  coupled and uncoupled 
that is
conserved, not the matter or the energy per se.
Further, this conservation of
anenergy is not spatial; rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of
at least
four or more dimensions.
(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement about
fundamental physical reality. In fact, it is only a statement about
FIRST ORDER
reality  the reality that emerges from the vector interaction of
electromagnetic energy with matter. When we break down the vectors into
scalars
(shadow vectors or hypervectors), we immediatly enter a vastly different,
far
more fundamental reality. In this reality superluminal velocity,
multiple
universes, travel back and forth in time, higher dimensions, variation
of all
"fundamental constants" of nature, materialization and dematerialization,
and
violation of the "conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our
present
Aristotlean logic  fitted to the photon interaction by vector light as
the
fundamental observation mechanism  is incapable of describing or
modeling
this more fundamental reality. Using scalar waves and scalar
interactions as
much subtler, far less limited observation/detection mechanisms, we must
have a
new "superrelativity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic reality
uncovered by Nikola Tesla.
(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always occuring
with
 and locked to  mass. Indeed, charge is not necessarily quantized,
just as
it is not necessarily locked to mass. Ehrenhaft discovered and reported
fractional charges for years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored. See
P.A.M.
Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature", Sumposium
on the
Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Merha,
D.
Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 1214 for a presentation of some of
Ehrenhaft's
results. Within the last few years Stanford University researchers have
also
positively demonstrated the existence of "fractional charge."
For a layman's
description of their work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science
News, Vol.
119, January 31, 1981, pp. 6869. Indeed, Dirac in his referenced
article
points out that Millikan himself  in his original oildrop experiments

reported one measurement of fractional charge, but discounted it as
probably
due to error.
(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through normal
space.
Thus we use or model only the most elementary type of motion  that
performed
by vector electromagnetic energy. We do not allow for things to "travel
inside
the vector flow itself." Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle
flow
inside the first, and a third, even more subtle flow inside the second,
and
so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and out of energy itself 
and any
anenergy component of energy. There are hypervectors and hyperscalars
unlimited
, within the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know. Further,
these
"interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized, allowing physical
reality
itself to be directly engineered, almost without limits.
(16) We always assume everything exists in time.
Actually, nothing presently
measured exists in time, because the physicical detection/measurement
process
of our present instruments destroys time, ripping it off and tossing it
away 
and thereby "collapsing the wave function." Present scientific
methodology thus
is seriously flawed. It does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth,
but only
a partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great scientific
oversights.
For example.
mass does not exist in time, but mass x time (masstime) does. A
fundamental constant does not exist in time, but "constant x time" does.
Energy
does not exist in time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space
itself does
not exist in time  spacetime does. We are almost always one dimension
short
in every observable we model. Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and
we have
developed instruments that detect and measure spatially only. Such
instruments
can never measure and detect the phenomenology of the nested substrata
of time.
By using scalar technology, however, less limited instruments can indeed
be
constructed  and they have been. With such new instruments, the
phenomenology
of the new electromagnetics can be explored and an engineering
technology
developed.
(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of virtual
state (particle physics) and orthogonally rotated frames (hyperspaces).
Actually, the two are identical, as I showed in the appendix to my book,
The
Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp.
233235. A
virtual particle in the laborotory frame is an observable particle in a
hyperspatial frame rotated more than one orthogonal turn away. This of
course
implies that the hyperspatial velocity of all virtual particles is
greater than
the speed of light. The particle physicist is already deeply involved in
hyperspaces and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In
other words
, he is using tachyons (particles that move faster than light) without
realizing it.
(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is not an
observable, and therefore it cannot be measured or detected. According
to this
assumption, one must always infer time from spatial measurements,
because all
detections and measurements are spatial. With this assumption, our
scientists
prejudice themselves against looking for finer, subquantal measurement
methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present limitation is
the
result of the type of electromagnetics we presently know, where all
instruments
(the "measurers") have been interacted with by vector electromagnetic
energy
(light). Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is
continually
absorbing and emitting photons, and in the process they are continually
connecting to time and disconnecting from time.
If time is continually being
carried away from the detector itself by its emitted photons, then the
detector
cannot hold and "detect" that which it has just lost. With Tesla
electromagnetics, however, the fundamental limitation of our present
instru
ments need not apply. With finer instruments, we can show there are an
infinite
number of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level time"
which is
continually being lost by vector light (photon) interaction. By using
subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to deeper levels of time
 in
which case the upper levels of time ARE measureable and detectable, in
contradistinction to present assumptions.
(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered to be, a
continuous dimension such as length. This is only a gross approximation.
Indeed
, time is not like a continuous "dimension," but more like a series of
"stiches," each of which is individually made and then ripped out before
the
next stitch appears. "Vector light" photons interact one at a time, and
it is
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change itself. The
absorbtion
of a photon  which is energy x time  by a spatial mass converts it
to
masstime: the time was added by the photon. The emission of a photon
tears away
the time, leaving behind again a spatial mass. It is not accidental,
then, that
time flows at the speed of light, for it is light which contains and
carries
time.
It is also not accidental that the photon IS the individual quantum.
Since all our instruments presently are continually absorbing and
emitting
photons, they are all "quantized," and they accordingly "quantize" their
detections. This is true because all detection is totally internal to
the
detector, and the instruments only detect only their own internal
changes.
Since these detections are on a totally granular quantized background,
the
detections themselves are quantized. The Minkowski model is
fundamentally
erroneous in its modeling of time, and for that reason relativity and
quantum
mechanics continue to resist all attempts to successfully combine them,
quantum
field theory notwithstanding.
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are considered
mutually exclusive.
Actually this is also untrue.
In 1974, for example,
Santilli proved that electrical field and gravitational fiend indeed are
not
mutually exclusive.
In that case one is left with two possibilities:
(a) they are totally the same thing, or (b) they are partially the same
thing.
For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and Gravitation: Some
Puzzling
Questions," Annals of Physics, Vol. 83, No. 1, March 1974. With the new
Tesla
electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in time itself can be produced
electrically
, and electrostatics (when the charge has been seperated from the mass)
becomes
a "magic" tool capable of directly affecting anything that exists in
time 
including the gravitational field. Antigravity and the intertial drive
are
immediate and direct consequences of the new electromagnetics.
(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of physics,
and
not affected by physical means. Literally, the prevailing belief of
Western
scientists is that man is a mechanical robot  even though relativity
depends
entirely upon the idea of the idea of the "observer." Western science
today
thus has essentially become dogmatic, and in this respect borders on a
religion.
Since this "religion," so to speak, is now fairly well entrenched in its
power
in the state, Western science is turning itself into an oligarchy. But
mind
occupies time, and when we measure and affect time, we can directly
measure and
affect mind itself. In the new electromagnetics, then, Man regains his
dignity
and his humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to science.
In my
book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already pointed out the reality of
mind and
a simplified way in which it can be modeled to the first order. With
scalar wave
instruments, the reality of mind and thought can be measured in the
laboratory,
and parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific discipline.
(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not
permitted
or severely discouraged in the present theory. For one thing, integrals
of
multiple valued derivative functions have the annoying habit of "blowing
up" and
yielding erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not
allow
multiple types of time! This leads to the absurdity of the present
interpretation
of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a single
observation)
at a time.
So if one believes as "absurd" a thing as the fact that more than
one person can observe an apple at the same time, the present physics
fails.
However, the acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple
simultaneous
observation leads to a physics so bizarre and incredible that most
Western
physicists have been unable to tolerate it, much less examine its
consequences.
In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous observation,
all possibilities are real and physical. There are an infinite number of
worlds, orthogonal to one another, and each world is continually
splitting into
additional such "worlds" at a stupendous rate.
Nonetheless, this physics
was worked out by Everett for his doctoral thesis in 1956, and the
thesis was
published in 1957. (See Hugh Everett, III, The ManyWorlds
Interpretation of
Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A.
Wheeler,
B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N. Graham; eds. Bryce
S.
Dewitt and Neill Graham, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton
University
Press, 1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely
consistent with the present experimental
basis of physics. The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for
only
a single "rodl" or universe  or "level." The expanded theory, on the
other
hand, contains multiply nested levels of virtual state charge  and
these
levels are identically the same as orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes."
Multiple kinds  and values  of time also exist. The new concept
differs from
Everett's, however, in that the orthogonal universes intercommunicate in
the
virtual state.
That is, an observable in one universe is always a virtual
quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have multilevel
"continuities" and "discontinuities" simultaneously, without logical
conflict.
It is precisely these levels of charge  these levels of scalar vacuum

that lace together the discontinuous quanta generated by the interaction
of
vector light with mass.
However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one requires a
new,
expanded logic which contains the old Aristotlean logic as a subset. I
have
already pointed out the new logic in my paper, "A Conditional Criterion
for
Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," 1979, available from the
National
Technical Information Center, ADA071032.
Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics,
and
relativity are drastically changed by the Tesla electromagnetics, as I
point
ed out in my paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla
Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030, 1980.
The present electromagnetics is just a special case of a much more
fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as
Newtonian
physics is a special case of the relativistic physics. But in the new
electromagnetics case, the differences between the old and the new are
far more
drastic and profound.
Additional References
 
1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental Magnetic
Charge
(Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic Energy)," 1981/1982 (private
communication). Dr. Boren has a cogent argument that the positron is the
fundamental unit of magnetic charge.
His theory thus assigns fundamentally
different natures to positive charge and
negative charge.
In support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the
"positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than the "negative"
end. In other words, the circuit works simply from higher accumulation
of
negative charges (the "negative" end) to a lesser accumulation of
negative
charges (the "positive" end). Nowhere needthere be positive charges (protons,
positrons, etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. Borens theory, though
dramatic
at first encounter, nonetheless bears close and meticulous examination

particularly since he has been able to gather experimental data which
support
his theory and disagree with present theory.
2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity Phenomena,"
philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No. 191, December 1939,
pp. 694
701.
3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size and
Weight
of Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of Magnitude r = 4 x
10(5) cm.
to 5 x 10(6) cm., as well as the Production of Real Images of
Submicroscopic Particles by means of Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and
Jour. of Sci., Vol. II (Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 3051.
4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the Existance
of Charges
smaller than the Electron  (a) The Micromagnet; (b) The Law of
Resistance;
© The computation of errors of the Method," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci.,
Vol. V (Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225241.
5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic charge,
in
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.
6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New Foundation
for
Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press, Smithtown, NY, First Edition,
1981, pp.
1520.
7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational Waves in
Plasma,"
Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July 1981, (U.S. Translation,
Consultants
Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982), pp. 593597.
8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics to
the power
conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys. Review A, Vol. 20, no. 4,
October
1979, pp. 16141618.
9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems With
a
Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available through the Defense
Technical Information Center (AD 773188).
10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic JetPropulsion in the Direction of
current
flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982, pp. 311312
11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New Scientist,
17
September 1981, p. 723.
12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the FreeFall
Acceleration
of a Relativistic Charged Particle.
II. A Cylindrical Solenoid in a Time
Independent Field of Inertial Forces," Izvestiya VUZ, Fizika, No. 7,
1979, pp.
2832. English Translation: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp.
829833. If one understands the new, expanded electromagnetics, this
Soviet
paper indicates a means of generating antigravity and pure inertial
fields.
13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of PostRelativistic Concepts in
Physics and
Advanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited, No. 12, Winter 1981, pp.
1520.
14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity,
Library
of Congress Catalogue No. 77670044. Extensive compilation of
measurements of
the speed of light. Clearly shows the speed of light is not constant but
changes,
sometimes even daily.
B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy
Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much more
funda
mental electromagnetic theory discovered by Nikola Tesla at the turn of
the century.
Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very
high
electrical potential  something on the order of 200 million volts,
with
respect to a hypothetical zero charge.
Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" 
which has
the same potential as the vacuum  actually has a nonzero absolute
potential.
This circuit ground has a value of zero only with respect to something
else
which has the same absolute electrical potential.
Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass"
current
(even if only a miniscule flow), is, by definition, a difference dropped
in
potential when a charge mass moves between two spatially seperated
points. What
we have termed "electrical current" only flows where there is a suitable
conducting medium between things which have a difference in absolute
potential.
Furthermore, between any two points in any material, there is considered
to be
a finite resistance  if we apply a voltage ahd have a mass current
flowing
between the two points! Rigorously, to have one of the three is to have
them all.
To lose one is to lose all three.
Immediately we see a major error in present
theory: One can have a "difference in scalar potential" between two
points without
having a "voltage drop" between them. Specifically, if no mass current
flows
between them, no resistance exists between them, and no voltage drop
exists
between them.
In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum
without
a voltage wave.
In that case, the wave has no Efield and no Hfield. The only
reason one has an E field around a statically charged object is because
the
charged electrons accumulated on the object are actually in violent
motion. It
is this motion of the charged masses that produces Efield  as well as
Hfield
whenever that entire Efield ensemble moves through laborotory space.
Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in present
electromagnetic theory. For example, let us examine a bird sitting on a
high
tension line.
The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass
electricity,
because there is no significant difference in potential drop between the
bird
and the line.
Specifically, between the birds two feet  each in contact with
a different portion of the line  there exists no potential difference.
This
is true even though, with respect to the vacuum, each foot is at a
potential
that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass current flowing. And
it is true
even though the absolute potential of each foot may be some 200.1
million
"volts," were a mass current flowing.
Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through the
air to
light upon the high tension wire.
As he flies towards the wire, he is flying through
the massless electrostatic potential field of the wire, for that field
extends
an infinite distance away from the wire.
The electrostatic potential field 
pure 0field  is actually the spatiotemporal intensity of the massless
charge
at a point. In other words, as the bird flies to the wire, he flies into
an
increasing "massless charge" potential, building up to 100,000 "volts"
higher
than the earth. However, very little (if any) "mass flow" potential
difference
is experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so
essientially no
"charged mass currents" are induced in his body. Thus the little flier
safely
navigates into the teeth of a very high electrostatic potential, lights
upon the
wire, and is not "fried" in the process. When he lights on the wire,
his body has reached the electrostatic potential that each foot's
contact
point has. Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is
immersed
in an increased flux of massless charge  which is what the
electrostatic
potential represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in that charge
represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical current.
The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow 
"scalar"
current  without any mechanical work being done in the system. All
electrical
work in a circuit is done against the physical mass of the charged
masses that
flow. Rigorously, force is defined as the time rate of charge of
momentum.
Even in the relativistic case where F = ma + v(dm/dt), change of
momentum
requires mass movement. No mechanical work, and hence no energy, is
expended by
massless charge flow.
That is why the vacuum massless charge  which is composed of a very
high flux
of massless "particles"  normally does no work on our systems, and
expends
none of its very high "potential energy." It is exactly the same as the
bird
which flew into an increasing scalar field as it approached the high
tension
wire  no work was done upon the bird by the increasing scalar flux
currents
encountered by its body.
By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are as
birds
sitting on a high tension line! Until we create a significant differece
in
potential, via our present electromagnetic circuits, no current can flow
 anywhere.
Even if we produce potential differences, we must have a conductor
and charged masses to flow, if we with to produce mechanical work.
Presently our
electromagnetic theory allows us to create a difference in potential
within
different parts of a circuit, but only by moving and shifting charged
mass. We
therefore have to do work on this electrical mass in moving it around,
and we only get back the work we have put into the circuit. In other
words,
presently all wee do is "pump" electrical mass.
Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we substantially
"pulsed" the potential on the line.
Suppose we "pulsed" it such that the
bird's physical system  considered as a circuit containing a
capicitance, a
resistance, an inductance, and many free electrons  became resonant to
the pulsing frequency. In that case the "bird system" would resonate,
and a
great deal of electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of
the
bird. In the birds body, voltage would exist, charged mass current would
flow,
work would be done, and the bird would be electrocuted.
Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector fields
are not
produced (and a portion of the difficulty lies with the actual vector
mechanics
itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves continually penetrate the "space"
where
there is no mass movement. This means there can exist a "delta0"
without a
voltage or an Efield. The present theory does not allow this, because
it
always uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without belaboring
the
point, let us just say that is the mechanical spin of the individual
charged particle  such as the electron  which "entangles" or "knits
together" or "couples" independent scalar waves into vector waves. A
vector
wave is simply two coupled scalar waves. The entire force field concept

such as the Efield and the Bfield  is operationally Defined in terms
of the
force exhibited on a test particle, or test mass. Rigorusly, an Efield
does
not exist as a force field in a vacuum, but as two coupled scalar
0fields
"tumbling about each other." When these two coupled, tumbling fields
meet a
spinning electron, e.g.,
the force emerges on the electron mass. In short,
movement of a rotating mass changes delta0 to "voltage", creating the
V/I/R triad.
By "accululating charged mass particles"  such as electrons  one
certainly
can increase the value of 0, which represents the charge intensity or
"scalar
electrostatic potential." However, that is not the only way to increase
it.
Resonance and rotation of charged mass can also be appropriately
employed to
vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under proper circumstances.
By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla
electromagnetic
theory, it is possible to oscillate  and change the vacuum potential
itself,
in one part of an electrical system. Thus by correct procedures a part
of a
system can be electrically altered so that the absolute value of its
"ground"
(vacuum) potential differs significantly from the normal vacuumground
potential of the remainder of the circuit. In other words, we shift the
vacuumground potential of the part of the circuit by oscillating the
massless
vacuum charge itself, and in doing so we gain a substantial, oscillatory
electrical difference between that part of the circuit and the normal
ground
potential of the rest of the system. Then we connect the two parts of
the
system by means of a conductor containing a load in the middle.
In every conductor, a large number of "free electrons" are available.
If we
oscillate the actual vacuum charge itself, unlimited additional free
electrons also become availabe from the Dirac Sea, since partial
"unstripping"
of the negative energy wells (each containing an electron) occurs. This
"unstripping" of the potential of the well is due to vacuum potential
oscil
lation, which oscillates time as well as space.
To a negative energy well (
positive time), the oscillation of its "time stream" increases the
well's
negative potential during one halfcycle and decreases its potential for
the
other halfcycle.
Thus during half the oscillatory cycle, negative energy
electrons may be lifted from the Dirac Sea if the oscillation is
sufficiently intense.
Therefore we obtain an attendant voltage and flow of mass current
through the
load. This voltage and current, by the way, are essentially limitless,
and are
free for the asking, assuming the proper "vacuum oscillation" is
initiated
and maintained so that electrons are continually being lifted from the
Dirac
sea by the time oscillations, and fed into the circuit.
Standard electromagnetic theory assumes that the vacuum potential is
zero. It
does not recognize the existence of massless charge, separated from
charged
mass. Therefore, orthodox scientists have never looked for a way to
engineer
the vacuum, because they have not realized it is composed of pure
massless
charge.
Electrical physics has almost hopelessly confused charge and charged
mass, thereby eliminating scalar longitudinal electrostatic waves.
Expressed
in the bird/high tension line analogy, the present electromagnetic
theory
restricts us to walking along the high tension line, laboriously
carrying small
batteries and power units, unaware of the limitless, surging power
beneath our
very feet.
Electromagnetically, we have been rather like one of the five blind men
who
touched an elephant. We have only touched one small portion of the
electromagnetism "elephant," yet we thought we had grasped the entire
beast.

Use this information in any way that you wish; I take no responsibility
for
the results of your actions. This file was presented for "informational
use"
only.

Hiçbir
yazı/ resim izinsiz olarak kullanılamaz!! Telif hakları uyarınca
bu bir suçtur..! Tüm hakları Çetin BAL' a aittir. Kaynak gösterilmek şartıyla siteden
alıntı yapılabilir.
The Time Machine Project © 2005 Cetin BAL  GSM:+90 05366063183 Turkiye/Denizli
Ana Sayfa /index /Roket bilimi /
EMail /CetinBAL/Quantum Teleportation2
Time Travel Technology /Ziyaretçi
Defteri /UFO Technology/Duyuru
Kuantum Teleportation /Kuantum Fizigi
/Uçaklar(Aeroplane)
New World Order(Macro Philosophy)
/Astronomy

