Comments on the New Tesla
A:Discrepancies in Present EM Theory
There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing in
conventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presends a summary of
flaws, and is a further commentary on my discussion of scalar
waves in a previous paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet
Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1981 and 1982.
I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my friends
colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain anonymous. One of
two is an experimental genius who can produce items that do not work by
dox theory. The second is a master of materials science and
theory. I thank them both for their exceptional contributions and
regarding potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics theory, and
forbearance with the many discussions we have held on this and related
It goes without saying that any etrors in this paper are strictly my own,
not the fault of either of my distinguished colleagues.
(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are
made identical. Actually, on a charged particle, the "charge" is the
virtual particles on the "bare particle" of observable mass. The charged
icle is thus a "system" of true massless charge coupled to a bare
mass. The observable "mass" is static, three-dimensional and totally
"Charge" is dynamic, four-dimensional or more, virtual and
Further, the charge and observable mass can be de-coupled, contrary to
theory. Decoupled charge -- that is, the absence of mass -- is simply
presently refer to as "Vacuum." Vacuum, spacetime, and massless charge
identical. Rigorously, we should utilize any of these three as an "ether,"
suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see Max Born, Einstiein's
Relativity, Revised Edition, Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p.
all three of them are identically anenergy -- not energy, but more
components of energy.
(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-dimensional
stress. Instead, it is the intensity of a many-dimensional (at least
dimensional) virtual flux and a stress on all four dimensions of
This is easily seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is identically
charged. (It is not "filled" with charge; rather, it is charge!) Just
a gas under pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further
gas, the accumulation of charge (spacetime) stresses charge (spacetime).
Further, if freed from its attachment to mass, charge can flow
in time, exclusively in space, or in any combination of the two. Tesla
which are scalar waves in pure massless charge flux itself -- thus can
extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do not possess.
Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom in which to move,
compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way to visualize a tesla scalar
to regard it as a pure oscillation of time itself.
(3) Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic case,
least thought of as "composed of the same thing." For that reason,
regarded as "potential drop." This also is not true.
Rigorously, the potential
is the intensity of the virtual particle flux at a single point --
not there is any mass at the point -- and both the pressure and the
itself are spatiotemporal (4-dimensional) and not spatial (3-dimensional)
presently assumed. Voltage represents the spatial intersection of the
difference in potential between two seperated spatial points, and always
implies at least a miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it
spatial!). "Voltage" is spatial and depends upon the presence of
mass flow, while scalar electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and
upon the absence of observable mass flow. The two are not even of the
(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in fact
a very high value.
Vacuum has no mass, but it has great massless charge and
virtual particle charge flux. For proof that a charged vacuum is the
something in motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of
electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nature, Vol. 285, 15 May
154-155. In fact, vacuum IS charge, identically, and it is also
at least four-dimensional.
(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in
context. A three-dimensional spatial hole, for example, exists in time.
model time as a dimension, then the spatial hole has one dimension in 4-space.
So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence.
In the vacuum 4-space, a
spatial nothing is still a something. The "virtual" concept and
concept of a derivative are simply two present ways of unconsciously
this fundamental problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.
(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum) has
seperated into two parts. We can only think of a space as "continuing to
To separate vacuum spacetime into two pieces, an operation is
continually required. The operator that accomplishes this splitting
is the photon interaction, the interaction of vector electromagnetic
waves with mass. I have already strongly pointed out this effect and
a "raindrop model" or first-order physical change itself in my book, The
Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp.
(7) "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of (and
connected to) the magnetic field. In fact it is a separate, fundamental
of nature and it can be entirely disconnected from the magnetic field.
Richard P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley
Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to 15-14. Curiously,
fact has been proven for years, yet it has been almost completely
the West. The "(triangle)x" operator, when applied to the A-field, makes
B-field. If the (triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" A-field
possesses much-expanded characteristics from those presently allowed in
"bound" theory. Specifically, it becomes a scalar or "shadow vector"
it is not a normal vector field.
(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental constant
Instead it is a function of the intensity of the massless charge flux
(that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatic potential) of the vacuum
which it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and masless charge are one and the
one may say that the speed of light is a function of the intensity of
spatiotemporal vacuum!). The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the
the faster the speed of light in it. This is an observed fact and
by hardcore measurements. For example, distinct differences actually
the speed of light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth
compared to measurements in space away from planetary masses. In a
the surface of the earth, light moves significantly faster. For a
and the statistics, see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of the
of Light in Vacuum," Soviet Physics Journal, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp.
(original in Russian, translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The
Russians have used this knowledge for over two decades in their
psychotronics (energetics) program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientist
of the measured variation of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western
simply cannot believe it when it is pointed out to them!
(9) Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work. In fact,
arises from vector processes, and it can be disassembled into more
(anenergy) scalar components, since the vectors can. These scalar
individually can be moved to a distant location without expending work,
one is not moving force vectors. There the scalar components can be
reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy" appearing at a
with no loss in between the initial and distant points. For proof that a
field can be replaced by (and considered to be composed of) two scalar
see E. T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society,
1903, p. 367. By extension, any vector wave can be replaced by two
(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of
from a time-varying, electrically charged source.
In fact, an exact solution of
the problem does allow this longitudinal wave.
See T. D. Keech and J. F. Corum,
"A New Derivation for the Field of a Time-Varying Charge in Einsteins
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp.
for the proof.
(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited, and
not permit the explicit consideration of the internal, finer-grained
of a vector or a scalar. That is, a fundamental problem exists with the
basic assumptions in the vector mathematics itself. The "space" of a
field, for example, does not have inter-nested sublevels (subspaces)
finer "shadow vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has
discovered that electrical reality is built that way. Thus one should
use a "hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Muses. A scalar
filled with (and composed of) nested levels of other "spaces" containing
vectors, where these sum to "zero" in the ordinary observable frame
observable vector resultant. In Muses' mathematics, for example, zero
roots. Real physical devices can be -- and have been -- constructed in
accordance with Muses' theory. For an introduction to Muses' profound
hypernumberss approach, see Charles Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein,
Communication, Ogranization and Science, The Falcon's Wing Press, Indian
Colorado, 1958. See also Charles Muses', "Applied Hypernumbers:
Convepts," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also
Muses' "Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation, Janurary
(12) With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics, a new conservation of
law is required. Let us recapitulate for a moment. The oldest law called
the conservation of mass. The present law calls for the conservation of
and energy", but not each separately. If mass is regarded as simply
aspect of energy, then the present law calls for the conservation of
However, this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental concept. Since
energy concept is tied to work and the movement of vector forces, it
assumes "vector movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible
But as we pointed out, Whittaker showed that vectors can always be
broken down into more fundamental coupled scalar components. Further,
discovered that these "coupled components" of "energy" can be
separated, transmitted, processed, rejoined, etc. This directly implies
energy per se need not be conserved. The new law therefore calls for the
conservation of anenergy, the components of energy. These components may
coupled into energy, and the energy may be further compacted into mass.
the sum total of the (anenergy) components -- coupled and uncoupled --
conserved, not the matter or the energy per se.
Further, this conservation of
anenergy is not spatial; rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of
four or more dimensions.
(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement about
fundamental physical reality. In fact, it is only a statement about
reality -- the reality that emerges from the vector interaction of
electromagnetic energy with matter. When we break down the vectors into
(shadow vectors or hypervectors), we immediatly enter a vastly different,
more fundamental reality. In this reality superluminal velocity,
universes, travel back and forth in time, higher dimensions, variation
"fundamental constants" of nature, materialization and dematerialization,
violation of the "conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our
Aristotlean logic -- fitted to the photon interaction by vector light as
fundamental observation mechanism -- is incapable of describing or
this more fundamental reality. Using scalar waves and scalar
much subtler, far less limited observation/detection mechanisms, we must
new "superrelativity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic reality
uncovered by Nikola Tesla.
(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized, in addition to always occuring
-- and locked to -- mass. Indeed, charge is not necessarily quantized,
it is not necessarily locked to mass. Ehrenhaft discovered and reported
fractional charges for years, in the 30's and 40's, and was ignored. See
Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature", Sumposium
Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. Jagdish Merha,
Reidel, Boston, 1973, pp. 12-14 for a presentation of some of
results. Within the last few years Stanford University researchers have
positively demonstrated the existence of "fractional charge."
For a layman's
description of their work, see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science
119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69. Indeed, Dirac in his referenced
points out that Millikan himself -- in his original oildrop experiments
reported one measurement of fractional charge, but discounted it as
due to error.
(15) Presently, things are always regarded as traveling through normal
Thus we use or model only the most elementary type of motion -- that
by vector electromagnetic energy. We do not allow for things to "travel
the vector flow itself." Yet, actually, there is a second, more subtle
inside the first, and a third, even more subtle flow inside the second,
so on. We may operate inside, onto, into, and out of energy itself --
anenergy component of energy. There are hypervectors and hyperscalars
, within the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know. Further,
"interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized, allowing physical
itself to be directly engineered, almost without limits.
(16) We always assume everything exists in time.
Actually, nothing presently
measured exists in time, because the physicical detection/measurement
of our present instruments destroys time, ripping it off and tossing it
and thereby "collapsing the wave function." Present scientific
is seriously flawed. It does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth,
a partial (spatial) truth. This in turn leads to great scientific
mass does not exist in time, but mass x time (masstime) does. A
fundamental constant does not exist in time, but "constant x time" does.
does not exist in time, but energy x time (action) does. Even space
not exist in time -- spacetime does. We are almost always one dimension
in every observable we model. Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and
developed instruments that detect and measure spatially only. Such
can never measure and detect the phenomenology of the nested substrata
By using scalar technology, however, less limited instruments can indeed
constructed -- and they have been. With such new instruments, the
of the new electromagnetics can be explored and an engineering
(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of virtual
state (particle physics) and orthogonally rotated frames (hyperspaces).
Actually, the two are identical, as I showed in the appendix to my book,
Excalibur Briefing, Strawberry Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp.
virtual particle in the laborotory frame is an observable particle in a
hyperspatial frame rotated more than one orthogonal turn away. This of
implies that the hyperspatial velocity of all virtual particles is
the speed of light. The particle physicist is already deeply involved in
hyperspaces and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In
, he is using tachyons (particles that move faster than light) without
(18) Presently quantum mechanics rigorously states that time is not an
observable, and therefore it cannot be measured or detected. According
assumption, one must always infer time from spatial measurements,
detections and measurements are spatial. With this assumption, our
prejudice themselves against looking for finer, subquantal measurement
methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present limitation is
result of the type of electromagnetics we presently know, where all
(the "measurers") have been interacted with by vector electromagnetic
(light). Every mass that has temperature (and all masses do!) is
absorbing and emitting photons, and in the process they are continually
connecting to time and disconnecting from time.
If time is continually being
carried away from the detector itself by its emitted photons, then the
cannot hold and "detect" that which it has just lost. With Tesla
electromagnetics, however, the fundamental limitation of our present
ments need not apply. With finer instruments, we can show there are an
number of levels to "time", and it is only the "quantum level time"
continually being lost by vector light (photon) interaction. By using
subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to deeper levels of time
which case the upper levels of time ARE measureable and detectable, in
contradistinction to present assumptions.
(19) In the present physics, time is modeled as, and considered to be, a
continuous dimension such as length. This is only a gross approximation.
, time is not like a continuous "dimension," but more like a series of
"stiches," each of which is individually made and then ripped out before
next stitch appears. "Vector light" photons interact one at a time, and
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change itself. The
of a photon -- which is energy x time -- by a spatial mass converts it
masstime: the time was added by the photon. The emission of a photon
the time, leaving behind again a spatial mass. It is not accidental,
time flows at the speed of light, for it is light which contains and
It is also not accidental that the photon IS the individual quantum.
Since all our instruments presently are continually absorbing and
photons, they are all "quantized," and they accordingly "quantize" their
detections. This is true because all detection is totally internal to
detector, and the instruments only detect only their own internal
Since these detections are on a totally granular quantized background,
detections themselves are quantized. The Minkowski model is
erroneous in its modeling of time, and for that reason relativity and
mechanics continue to resist all attempts to successfully combine them,
field theory notwithstanding.
(20) Presently, gravitational field and electrical field are considered
Actually this is also untrue.
In 1974, for example,
Santilli proved that electrical field and gravitational fiend indeed are
In that case one is left with two possibilities:
(a) they are totally the same thing, or (b) they are partially the same
For the proof, see R. M. Santilli, "Partons and Gravitation: Some
Questions," Annals of Physics, Vol. 83, No. 1, March 1974. With the new
electromagnetics, pure scalar waves in time itself can be produced
, and electrostatics (when the charge has been seperated from the mass)
a "magic" tool capable of directly affecting anything that exists in
including the gravitational field. Antigravity and the intertial drive
immediate and direct consequences of the new electromagnetics.
(21) Presently, mind is considered metaphysical, not a part of physics,
not affected by physical means. Literally, the prevailing belief of
scientists is that man is a mechanical robot -- even though relativity
entirely upon the idea of the idea of the "observer." Western science
thus has essentially become dogmatic, and in this respect borders on a
Since this "religion," so to speak, is now fairly well entrenched in its
in the state, Western science is turning itself into an oligarchy. But
occupies time, and when we measure and affect time, we can directly
affect mind itself. In the new electromagnetics, then, Man regains his
and his humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to science.
book, The Excalibur Briefing, I have already pointed out the reality of
a simplified way in which it can be modeled to the first order. With
instruments, the reality of mind and thought can be measured in the
and parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific discipline.
(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not
or severely discouraged in the present theory. For one thing, integrals
multiple valued derivative functions have the annoying habit of "blowing
yielding erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not
multiple types of time! This leads to the absurdity of the present
of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a single
at a time.
So if one believes as "absurd" a thing as the fact that more than
one person can observe an apple at the same time, the present physics
However, the acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple
observation leads to a physics so bizarre and incredible that most
physicists have been unable to tolerate it, much less examine its
In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous observation,
all possibilities are real and physical. There are an infinite number of
worlds, orthogonal to one another, and each world is continually
additional such "worlds" at a stupendous rate.
Nonetheless, this physics
was worked out by Everett for his doctoral thesis in 1956, and the
published in 1957. (See Hugh Everett, III, The Many-Worlds
Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J. A.
B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N. Graham; eds. Bryce
Dewitt and Neill Graham, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton
Press, 1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics is entirely
consistent with the present experimental
basis of physics. The present electromagnetic theory is constructed for
a single "rodl" or universe -- or "level." The expanded theory, on the
hand, contains multiply nested levels of virtual state charge -- and
levels are identically the same as orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes."
Multiple kinds -- and values -- of time also exist. The new concept
Everett's, however, in that the orthogonal universes intercommunicate in
That is, an observable in one universe is always a virtual
quantity in each of the other universes. Thus one can have multi-level
"continuities" and "discontinuities" simultaneously, without logical
It is precisely these levels of charge -- these levels of scalar vacuum
that lace together the discontinuous quanta generated by the interaction
vector light with mass.
However, to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one requires a
expanded logic which contains the old Aristotlean logic as a subset. I
already pointed out the new logic in my paper, "A Conditional Criterion
Identity, Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," 1979, available from the
Technical Information Center, AD-A071032.
Even as logic is extended, quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics,
relativity are drastically changed by the Tesla electromagnetics, as I
ed out in my paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla
Weapons," Tesla Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030, 1980.
The present electromagnetics is just a special case of a much more
fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as
physics is a special case of the relativistic physics. But in the new
electromagnetics case, the differences between the old and the new are
drastic and profound.
1. Boren, Dr. Lawence Milton, "Discovery of the Fundamental Magnetic
(Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic Energy)," 1981/1982 (private
communication). Dr. Boren has a cogent argument that the positron is the
fundamental unit of magnetic charge.
His theory thus assigns fundamentally
different natures to positive charge and
In support of Dr. Boren, one should point out that the
"positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than the "negative"
end. In other words, the circuit works simply from higher accumulation
negative charges (the "negative" end) to a lesser accumulation of
charges (the "positive" end). Nowhere needthere be positive charges (protons,
positrons, etc.) to make the circuit work. Dr. Borens theory, though
at first encounter, nonetheless bears close and meticulous examination
particularly since he has been able to gather experimental data which
his theory and disagree with present theory.
2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity Phenomena,"
philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No. 191, December 1939,
3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size and
of Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of Magnitude r = 4 x
to 5 x 10(-6) cm., as well as the Production of Real Images of
Submicroscopic Particles by means of Ultraviolet Light," Phil. Mag. and
Jour. of Sci., Vol. II (Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 30-51.
4. Ehrenhaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the Existance
smaller than the Electron - (a) The Micromagnet; (b) The Law of
© The computation of errors of the Method," Phil. Mag. and Jour. of Sci.,
Vol. V (Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225-241.
5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic charge,
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.
6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New Foundation
Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press, Smithtown, NY, First Edition,
7. Ignat'ev, Yu. G. and Balakin, A. B., "Nonliner Gravitational Waves in
Soviet Physics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 7, July 1981, (U.S. Translation,
Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982), pp. 593-597.
8. Yater, Joseph C., "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics to
conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys. Review A, Vol. 20, no. 4,
1979, pp. 1614-1618.
9. DeSantis, Romano M. et al, "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems With
Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available through the Defense
Technical Information Center (AD 773188).
10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the Direction of
flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982, pp. 311-312
11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New Scientist,
September 1981, p. 723.
12. Gonyaev, V. V., "Experimental Determination of the Free-Fall
of a Relativistic Charged Particle.
II. A Cylindrical Solenoid in a Time-
Independent Field of Inertial Forces," Izvestiya VUZ, Fizika, No. 7,
28-32. English Translation: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp.
829-833. If one understands the new, expanded electromagnetics, this
paper indicates a means of generating antigravity and pure inertial
13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts in
Advanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited, No. 12, Winter 1981, pp.
14. F. K. Preikschat, A Critical look at the theory of Relativity,
of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive compilation of
the speed of light. Clearly shows the speed of light is not constant but
sometimes even daily.
B: The Secret of Electrical Free Energy
Present electromagnetic theory is only a special case of the much more
mental electromagnetic theory discovered by Nikola Tesla at the turn of
Pure vacuum is pure charge flux, without mass. The vacuum has a very
electrical potential -- something on the order of 200 million volts,
respect to a hypothetical zero charge.
Thus in an ordinary electrical circuit, each point of the "ground" --
the same potential as the vacuum -- actually has a non-zero absolute
This circuit ground has a value of zero only with respect to something
which has the same absolute electrical potential.
Voltage, which is always associated with a flow of electrical "mass"
(even if only a miniscule flow), is, by definition, a difference dropped
potential when a charge mass moves between two spatially seperated
we have termed "electrical current" only flows where there is a suitable
conducting medium between things which have a difference in absolute
Furthermore, between any two points in any material, there is considered
a finite resistance -- if we apply a voltage ahd have a mass current
between the two points! Rigorously, to have one of the three is to have
To lose one is to lose all three.
Immediately we see a major error in present
theory: One can have a "difference in scalar potential" between two
having a "voltage drop" between them. Specifically, if no mass current
between them, no resistance exists between them, and no voltage drop
In the same fashion, one can have a "scalar wave" through the vacuum
a voltage wave.
In that case, the wave has no E-field and no H-field. The only
reason one has an E field around a statically charged object is because
charged electrons accumulated on the object are actually in violent
is this motion of the charged masses that produces E-field -- as well as
whenever that entire E-field ensemble moves through laborotory space.
Now let us reason together the "approximate" manner utilized in present
electromagnetic theory. For example, let us examine a bird sitting on a
The bird sits on the high tension line without a flow of mass
because there is no significant difference in potential drop between the
and the line.
Specifically, between the birds two feet -- each in contact with
a different portion of the line -- there exists no potential difference.
is true even though, with respect to the vacuum, each foot is at a
that would be "100,000 volts higher," were a mass current flowing. And
it is true
even though the absolute potential of each foot may be some 200.1
"volts," were a mass current flowing.
Now an interesting thing happens to the bird when he flies through the
light upon the high tension wire.
As he flies towards the wire, he is flying through
the massless electrostatic potential field of the wire, for that field
an infinite distance away from the wire.
The electrostatic potential field --
pure 0-field -- is actually the spatiotemporal intensity of the massless
at a point. In other words, as the bird flies to the wire, he flies into
increasing "massless charge" potential, building up to 100,000 "volts"
than the earth. However, very little (if any) "mass flow" potential
is experienced upon his body in approaching the wire, and so
"charged mass currents" are induced in his body. Thus the little flier
navigates into the teeth of a very high electrostatic potential, lights
wire, and is not "fried" in the process. When he lights on the wire,
his body has reached the electrostatic potential that each foot's
point has. Again, there is no mass current flow. But his body is
in an increased flux of massless charge -- which is what the
potential represents. And each "virtual particle" flow in that charge
represents a "massless (scalar)" electrical current.
The point is, one can have any amount of massless charge flow --
current -- without any mechanical work being done in the system. All
work in a circuit is done against the physical mass of the charged
flow. Rigorously, force is defined as the time rate of charge of
Even in the relativistic case where F = ma + v(dm/dt), change of
requires mass movement. No mechanical work, and hence no energy, is
massless charge flow.
That is why the vacuum massless charge -- which is composed of a very
of massless "particles" -- normally does no work on our systems, and
none of its very high "potential energy." It is exactly the same as the
which flew into an increasing scalar field as it approached the high
wire -- no work was done upon the bird by the increasing scalar flux
encountered by its body.
By existing "in the vacuum," so to speak, we (the whole earth) are as
sitting on a high tension line! Until we create a significant differece
potential, via our present electromagnetic circuits, no current can flow
Even if we produce potential differences, we must have a conductor
and charged masses to flow, if we with to produce mechanical work.
electromagnetic theory allows us to create a difference in potential
different parts of a circuit, but only by moving and shifting charged
therefore have to do work on this electrical mass in moving it around,
and we only get back the work we have put into the circuit. In other
presently all wee do is "pump" electrical mass.
Now notice what would happen to the bird on the line if we substantially
"pulsed" the potential on the line.
Suppose we "pulsed" it such that the
bird's physical system -- considered as a circuit containing a
resistance, an inductance, and many free electrons -- became resonant to
the pulsing frequency. In that case the "bird system" would resonate,
great deal of electrical mass would surge back and forth in the body of
bird. In the birds body, voltage would exist, charged mass current would
work would be done, and the bird would be electrocuted.
Also, note that, without mass movement, electromagnetic vector fields
produced (and a portion of the difficulty lies with the actual vector
itself). Scalar (nonvector) waves continually penetrate the "space"
there is no mass movement. This means there can exist a "delta-0"
voltage or an E-field. The present theory does not allow this, because
always uses "q" (charge) to be charged mass. Briefly, without belaboring
point, let us just say that is the mechanical spin of the individual
charged particle -- such as the electron -- which "entangles" or "knits
together" or "couples" independent scalar waves into vector waves. A
wave is simply two coupled scalar waves. The entire force field concept
such as the E-field and the B-field -- is operationally Defined in terms
force exhibited on a test particle, or test mass. Rigorusly, an E-field
not exist as a force field in a vacuum, but as two coupled scalar
"tumbling about each other." When these two coupled, tumbling fields
spinning electron, e.g.,
the force emerges on the electron mass. In short,
movement of a rotating mass changes delta-0 to "voltage", creating the
By "accululating charged mass particles" -- such as electrons -- one
can increase the value of 0, which represents the charge intensity or
electrostatic potential." However, that is not the only way to increase
Resonance and rotation of charged mass can also be appropriately
vary the vacuum charge potential 0, under proper circumstances.
By the correct application of rotary principles and Tesla
theory, it is possible to oscillate -- and change the vacuum potential
in one part of an electrical system. Thus by correct procedures a part
system can be electrically altered so that the absolute value of its
(vacuum) potential differs significantly from the normal vacuum-ground
potential of the remainder of the circuit. In other words, we shift the
vacuum-ground potential of the part of the circuit by oscillating the
vacuum charge itself, and in doing so we gain a substantial, oscillatory
electrical difference between that part of the circuit and the normal
potential of the rest of the system. Then we connect the two parts of
system by means of a conductor containing a load in the middle.
In every conductor, a large number of "free electrons" are available.
oscillate the actual vacuum charge itself, unlimited additional free
electrons also become availabe from the Dirac Sea, since partial
of the negative energy wells (each containing an electron) occurs. This
"unstripping" of the potential of the well is due to vacuum potential
lation, which oscillates time as well as space.
To a negative energy well (
positive time), the oscillation of its "time stream" increases the
negative potential during one half-cycle and decreases its potential for
Thus during half the oscillatory cycle, negative energy
electrons may be lifted from the Dirac Sea if the oscillation is
Therefore we obtain an attendant voltage and flow of mass current
load. This voltage and current, by the way, are essentially limitless,
free for the asking, assuming the proper "vacuum oscillation" is
and maintained so that electrons are continually being lifted from the
sea by the time oscillations, and fed into the circuit.
Standard electromagnetic theory assumes that the vacuum potential is
does not recognize the existence of massless charge, separated from
mass. Therefore, orthodox scientists have never looked for a way to
the vacuum, because they have not realized it is composed of pure
Electrical physics has almost hopelessly confused charge and charged
mass, thereby eliminating scalar longitudinal electrostatic waves.
in the bird/high tension line analogy, the present electromagnetic
restricts us to walking along the high tension line, laboriously
batteries and power units, unaware of the limitless, surging power
Electromagnetically, we have been rather like one of the five blind men
touched an elephant. We have only touched one small portion of the
electromagnetism "elephant," yet we thought we had grasped the entire
Use this information in any way that you wish; I take no responsibility
the results of your actions. This file was presented for "informational
yazı/ resim izinsiz olarak kullanılamaz!! Telif hakları uyarınca
bu bir suçtur..! Tüm hakları Çetin BAL' a aittir. Kaynak gösterilmek şartıyla siteden
The Time Machine Project © 2005 Cetin BAL - GSM:+90 05366063183 -Turkiye/Denizli
Ana Sayfa /index /Roket bilimi /
E-Mail /CetinBAL/Quantum Teleportation-2
Time Travel Technology /Ziyaretçi
Defteri /UFO Technology/Duyuru
Kuantum Teleportation /Kuantum Fizigi
New World Order(Macro Philosophy)