interview with Tom Bearden
appeared in a magazine called "Megabrain Report". It is dated 4-Feb-1991.
The interviewers were Terry Patten and Michael Hutchison.
you offer the layman an extremely simplified summary of what scalars
are, how they relate to Maxwell's equations, unified field theory,
and the limitations of currently accepted quantum physics,
relativity theory, and electromagnetics?
A: Whew! You've
asked for a complete explanation of how to unify the three major
disciplines of physics, specify what's wrong with the three present
versions of those disciplines that has prevented their unification,
and how this was in Maxwell's original quaternion equations (some
200 of which are actually his theory, not the pale four vector
equations written by Heaviside and Gibbs). You also asked for an
explanation of scalars versus vectors, and how the present vector
analysis (of Heaviside and Gibbs) misses the boat with respect to
structured scalars. And you've asked me to do it simply, in layman's
terms. To say that that's a tall order is the understatement of the
Okay, we'll have a go at it
anyway. We'll start with scalars and vectors.
Basically we visualize things
in the universe as two sorts those that move (have motion) and those
that don't. In physics we know already that this is in error; there
isn't anything in the universe, anywhere, that is motionless. At
least it is moving through time, which is still a special kind of
motion. Also, we know that everything seems to be made up of much
finer things, and these finer things are always in motion - often
very violent motion. So what we observe as a passive thing -
sitting still spatially, so to speak - is made up of subthings in
violent motion spatially. And the whole system that is not moving
spatially is still moving in time. However, we don't see "time" but
just space; therefore we see the thing as "motionless." However, the
"motionless" thing we look at is rather like a fixed whirlpool in a
swiftly flowing river the whirlpool seems to us to stay "fixed" and
motionless, but internally its parts (the flowing water) are in
Another example is a
container of gas under pressure - such as the air tank at the
service station. The tank and "the air as a whole spatial volume"
isn't going anywhere, and we see them as "motionless." But inside
the gas its molecules are in violent motion, undergoing collisions,
etc. Indeed, inside the walls of the tank, the molecules and atoms
are in vibrational back-and-forth motion in a spatial lattice.
The point is, physically "motion"
and "motionless" only apply to the external characteristics of the
object to which we pin the label. So it represents only an
overall characteristic of the object, and does not completely
describe it. In a sense "motionless" is filled with motion, and all
In vector analysis, a scalar
quantity is considered to be a quantity that has magnitude or size,
but no motion. An example is pressure; the pressure of a gas has a
certain value of so many pounds per square inch, and we can measure
it, but the notion of pressure does not involve the notion of
movement of the gas through space. Therefore pressure is a scalar
quantity, and it's a gross, external quantity since it's a scalar.
Note, however, the dramatic difference here between the physics of
the situation and mathematics of the situation. In mathematics, when
you say something is a scalar, you're just speaking of a number,
without having a direction attached to it. And mathematically,
that's all there is to it; the number doesn't have an internal
structure, it doesn't have internal motion, etc. It just has
magnitude - and, of course, location, which may be attachment to an
However, physically, when we
say something has pressure or a scalar value, that is not all there
is to it. That particular aspect of the object or system may be
scalar, but internally the thing it's labeling can still be
decomposed into subsystems or particles or small things in violent
motion. That is, in physics the scalar quantity can mathematically
be further decomposed into an ensemble of vector quantities. Since
these parts are rushing around in all directions but the whole is
not translating through space, then obviously the sum of all those
fractional motions must be zero. Scalar pressure, for example, can
be decomposed into a myriad of opposing force vectors per unit area.
Mathematically, a vector is
an entity that not only may have magnitude or size, but is
translating through space. In physics, we apply the vector concept
to something that is moving, and/or to position. However, when we
think further, that "something" is made of smaller things, which
also are in violent motion, and these smaller things may be swarming
all over the place with differing velocities - or even flowing at
high speed in and out of the moving "system- thing" represented by
the vector. So even here, the vector thing is a special case of an
ensemble of smaller things.
In the physical world, in
anything - even inside a single point - there are always infolded
vector things in violent motion. We may say that these interior
critters are "hyperspatial" or "infolded" or "virtual"
or "hidden". But they're real and they're inside the point,
as seen by the external observer.
The point is this. Everything
seen externally is a plenum internally. In the real physical world,
both a thing that's externally motionless (a scalar) and a thing (a
vector) that's externally translating through space, are special
cases of a system whose internal parts are always in motion. If the
sum of the internal motions is zero, the external object seems to be
sitting still and motionless to us (though it's still moving through
time with - usually - uniform motion). We describe that internal
characteristic of the system as a vector zero resultant system.
Externally we may also characterize it as a scalar, because it still
possesses attributes that have magnitude. On the other hand, if the
sum of the internal motions is not zero, but is a motion in a
certain spatial direction, then to us the external object seems to
be moving along in space. That is, it is translating spatially.
Externally it has both magnitude and direction, so we view it as a
vector. To label a thing as only a vector is to look only at its
external attributes. To label a thing as only a scalar is to look
only at its external attributes. To look at its internal attributes,
it must be recognized as a scalar and a vector at the same time.
That is, the scalar attributes must be recognized to be composed on
Summing that up,
physically a scalar thing is a thing that (1) is a vector in time,
which is hidden from direct observation, (2) externally is just a
magnitude spatially, and (3) has an internal spatial vector
structure, and therefore a hyperspatial or virtual-state vector
structure. A vector is a thing in motion in a dimension (through a
frame), whether in space, hyperspace, or time. Rigorously it is not
possible to exclusively separate the notions of vector and scalar,
because any scalar, to persist, is automatically a vector in time.
These concepts or vector and
scalar are normally not nearly so well clarified in standard physics
and mathematics texts, unfortunately. Usually discussions of this
type are reserved to obscure papers in foundations of mathematics.
It may surprise the casual student, for example, that the notions of
line, point, space, zero, length, dimension, frame, time, and
observer have no truly acceptable definitions. Neither do the
notions of force, mass, field, potential, etc. In fact, mathematics
no longer attempts to explain how a line can be made of points.
Instead, in foundations, it is simply stated as three postulations
thusly "There is a class of entities called points. There is another
class of entities called lines. Lines are composed of points."
From a physics viewpoint,
one of the big problems with the present vector mathematics -
which is well-known not to be a complete system of mathematics in
the first place - is that the presence of a bunch of vectors that
sum to zero is just treated as a zero or absence of any vectors at
all. That is, the absence of any internal vectors at all is made
synonymous to the presence of a bunch of internal vectors that are
fighting each other to a draw. What this does is throw away the
internal energy and internal ordered structuring of the medium -
specifically, the energy of all the vector fighters that is
continually going on inside the local medium - inside spacetime
itself. Physically that's quite wrong, and one is throwing away
exactly half the energy of the situation. There is a very real
physical difference between a system of real vectors that fight to a
draw and so do not translate en masse, and the absence of any
vectors and vector-fighting at all. The difference is composed of
stress and its internal vector patterns - the internal energetic
engines in local spacetime and local rest mass - in short, the
energy trapped in the local medium.
Where electrical students
meet this hidden problem, of course, is in the fact that the four
vector Heaviside equations of EM are not closed. One always has to
assume that one or more of the "remaining potentials" is zero - that
is, absent. So right there all the texts and professors reduce even
Heaviside's equations to a special case of the absence of any "left-over
and hanging around" scalar potentials. As an example, that little
assumption gets rid of any possibility of theAharonov-Bohm effect,
where potentials alone can interfere, even in the absence of EM
force fields, and produce real force effects in charged particle
systems. That is, the sole agent of the interference of scalar
potentials can induce EM changes, according to the experimentally
proven Aharonov-Bohm effect, even in the total absence of EM force
Since 1959, it has been known
in quantum mechanics that the EM force fields are not primary
agents at all. We know that classical EM theory is completely
wrong on this.QM shows that it's the potentials that are primary,
not the force fields. In fact, it can be shown that the
B-field do not exist as such in vacuum; only the potential for
the E-field and the B-field exist in vacuum. Feynman pointed that
out, but nearly all of his modern cohorts seem not to have
recognized that fact. Indeed, vacuum is just a conglomerate of
potentials, nothing more, nothing less. And if you just look
carefully at the definitions of force and E-field, you see
immediately that (1) force (nonrelativistic case) consists of mass
times acceleration. Therefore a force consists of an accelerated
mass. An electric force consists of an accelerated charged mass,
normalized for a unit. But it really isn't treated that way in the
EM theory, where it continues to erroneously considered to exist as
a force field in the vacuum.
At least you've got to use
the adjectives "virtual" and "observable" to differentiate vacuum
things from material things. One can correctly state that a virtual
electric force field exists in vacuum, comprised of accelerating
virtual masses, but not an observable force field. The observable
electric force field requires, and consists of, accelerated
observable charged particles. And the only place observable
particles exist are in a physical medium, of a collection of one or
more observable particles in space.
So it doesn't take any
special powers of thought to directly show that there are some very
serious, fundamental things wrong with the present foundations of EM
theory. There are lots of other flaws in EM, such as the fall of the
Lorentz force law in modern railgun experiments. The law has always
been false, but is a sufficient approximation if the energy regime
is not too high. Peter Graneau's work is fundamental in this respect.
To sum this up another way.
The present vector analysis (as applied to electromagnetics)
discards the internal, trapped EM energy of local spacetime. Now
if the internal trapped energy of spacetime varies from place to
place, that is called a curved spacetime, relativistically speaking.
And when a spacetime is curved, there is communication of energy
between the internal, infolded, virtual EM energy state and the
external, translating, observable EM energy state. Curved one way,
the local spacetime is a sink, with external energy pouring into it
continually, and disappearing from observation of the external state.
Curved the other way, the local spacetime is a source, with energy
pouring out of it continually, and appearing in observation in the
What the present vector
system of EM does, therefore, is throw out the ability to use the
very strong EM force as an agent to curve local spacetime. The very
mathematics itself, a priori, assumes and guarantees a locally flat
spacetime. And in an uncurved region of spacetime, for example, you
are never going to make an over-unity machine - a so-called "free
energy" machine that will give you more energy out than you put in -
because the application of the vector theory a priori guarantees the
elimination of any hidden sources from the local spacetime (ST)
medium. If you're going to tap the trapped vacuum energy, and make a
so-called "free energy" device, you're going to have to curve the
local spacetime. That is the only way to produce a local energy
source in the vacuum, from which a current issues. Notice that, when
we put a paddlewheel in a river, we produce a free energy device
because we tap some of the energy in the flow. But we tap a current,
we do not just tap a potential per se. The entire secret of tapping
vacuum energy, to build a free energy device, is to produce a
current in the local vacuum potential that is self- sustained, and
then tap that current.
So the present EM theory
throws away exactly half of the energetics of the situation involved.
From time to time yet another physicist discovers that astonishing
fact, and publishes a paper on it to point it out. Nobody does
anything about it, however, because no one has the foggiest notion
of what to do. So everybody just lets it pass and nothing is changed.
Question2: Can you give
us a more concrete example of the missing half of the energy?
A: Yes. Suppose, for
example, you connect a voltmeter across a wall circuit to measure
the voltage. The meter needle moves against a spring with a force,
as a result of the detection made by the voltmeter. The actual
detection is an interaction inside the meter's probe which induces
conduction electrons to move. We read the needle movement that
resulted from those conduction electrons, and we infer so much
voltage. The important point is this The voltmeter is measuring the
energetics of its own internal change; it is not at all measuring
anything external. All instruments measure only their own internal
change. We infer the external thing that interacted with the
instrument to cause the internal change. We do not measure the
external entity directly, but only the results of its interaction
inside the probe and meter. And even then, we measure only the
external, spatial-translation energy of the instrumental interaction;
we do not measure or account for the internal energy of that
interaction. To state it more precisely The needle moved because
conduction electrons accelerated away from the instrument's
interaction area. This current flowed into a coil and produced a
force on the needle movement, rotating the needle against a spring.
At the same time, another current - a time-reversed, phase-conjugate
current - was induced in the atomic nuclei of the atoms in the
interaction area. This "inner current" flowed Whittaker- wise
through the atomic nuclei of the instrument, producing an equal and
opposite force. [This is the mechanism that produces Newton's third
law in the first place, as suspected by Feynman.] So the entire body
mass of the meter recoiled slightly from an equal and opposite force,
which we just loosely refer to - and recognize as - Newton's
reaction force. It's there, it's real, but we completely neglect it
in our electrical measurements Usually we don't think it had
anything to do with the external entity that interacted with the
voltmeter. But it was a product of the same interaction of that
external "something" within the meter. It's equal and opposite to
what generated our electrical measurement. So exactly as much energy
was produced in the "reaction force" energetics as was produced in
the "external meter needle force" part of the interaction. We only
measured and accounted for half the true energy of the interaction,
or else you've got to discard Newton's third law.
It follows that what actually
entered into the interaction was a system of oppositely paired
forces - a stress field, which is a scalar potential. This,
of course, is consistent with our observation that vacuum itself
is pure potential. As such, it consists of partial potentials of
various kinds - it's highly charged, and the ambient vacuum scalar
potential has very high magnitude. Remember that this ambient vacuum
stress (potential) can be decomposed into sets of bidirectional
forces. In our EM interaction, one- half of the stress pair - the
half that is the normal photon-generated EM forcewas utilized to
move the conduction electrons, involving primarily the electron
shells of the atoms imbedded in the vacuum potential. The other half
of the stress-pair interacted with, and moved, the atomic nucleus,
causing it to recoil. The recoil of the nucleus was slight, because
it is very, very much heavier than the accelerated outer electron.
To sum it up
All detection is actually
binary, it's not singular at all. When we detect photons or EM waves,
we normally account for only the externalized translation part of
the energetics of the interaction. We miss or neglect the
internalized translation part, and we miss or neglect precisely as
much internal energy as we account for externally. Again, I'm not
the first one to point this out by any means.
Question3: Can you give
us a precise summary statement of all this?
A: At the
interaction area, a part of the instrument and the external causal
agent are coupled together as a compound system. In that area, the
mass of the instrument exists as atoms, each of which has an inner
part (the nucleus) and an outer part (the electron shells). In the
coordinate system centered on that compound system, conservation
laws apply. The compressive stress of the interaction reacts
internally - i.e., against the atoms with their inner and outer
parts. Reaction from the nucleus induces a tensile stress. This
tensile stress, in the simplest case, can be decomposed into equal
and opposite forces, since stress is merely a set of such equal and
opposite forces. One of the bidirectional interaction forces moves
externally out of the atom via the electrons, electromagnetically
producing a conduction electron current through the instrument and
giving a needle reading. The second bidirectional interaction force
moves ever inward, since it is a phase conjugate and reconcentrates
inward ("crawfishes") rather than scattering outward. This forms a
hidden Whittaker current through the atomic nuclei, producing a
recoil on all of them. Precisely as much EM energy went into the
inner system as went into the outer system. But we normally only
measure and account for the external energy, and ignore the energy
in the internal channel.
Question4: Can you give
us a reference related to this, for example?
A: I'll give you
several of them that bear directly on this. See R. Chen, "Cancellation
of internal forces," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 49, No. 4,
Apr. 1981, p. 372. Chen gives a discussion of these summation
vectors and internal vectors. He points out that the internal forces
occur in equal and opposite pairs; in other words, as internal
stresses. That's certainly pointing out the internal, bidirectional
force structure of a scalar stress - a scalar potential, if we're
talking EM stress and EM forces. Note that this internal pattern is
exactly what Maxwell's quaternion theory captured and retained, and
that the Heaviside and Gibbs vector theory discards. Further, the
quaternions captured the internal order of this internal force
vector structure as well. Second, in a beautiful article Kidd
bluntly states that all our measurement/detection is really
binocular. See Richard Kidd et al, "Evolution of the modern
photon," American Journal of Physics, Vol. 57, No. 1, Jan. 1989, p.
Whittaker, of course, wrote the definitive engineering
methodology of how to do all this with EM waves - how to infold the
EM waves into a bidirectional wave structure that produces a
standing wave of externally force-field-free scalar potential.
The two Whittaker papers are (1) "On the partial differential
equations of mathematical physics," Mathematische Annalen, Vol. 57,
1903, p. 333-355; and (2) "On an expression of the electromagnetic
field due to electrons by means of two scalar potential functions,"
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., Series 2, Vol. 1, 1904, p. 367-372.
Now these hidden internal
wave structures exist in all scalar potentials, whether they are
electromagnetic or not. For example, Ziolkowski has pointed out
what is actually Whittaker's 1903 infolded bidirectional planar
waves inside the acoustic scalar wave, in work on acoustic missiles.
Acoustic missiles are slugs of very strong sound energy that stay
together in a slug as they travel, and strike a target a terrible
blow, just as if it were a "missile made of sound energy." [See
Richard Ziolkowski, "Localized transmission of wave energy,"
Proc. SPIE Vol. 1061, Microwave and Particle Beam Sources and
Directed Energy Concepts, Jan. 1989, p. 396-397. Ed.] A Soviet
scientist, Ignatovich, has pointed out the same remarkable
bidirectional wave structure inside the scalar potential associated
with the Schroedinger wave equation itself. [See V.K. Ignatovich,
"The remarkable capabilities of recursive relations," American
Journal of Physics, Vol. 57, No. 10, Oct. 1989, p. 873-878. Ed.] And
I've pointed out a mechanism by means of which you can make a
quantum potential, so that separate things - even widely separated -
can interact as if they were all pieces of the same system, and all
located together at the same location. Further, I've pointed out
that you can deliberately structure that quantum potential with a
Whittaker bidirectional wave structure.
Question5: Can you make
that last part a little simpler?
A: What that means
is that in QM, there's a special kind of potential you can make,
that can connect spatially separated things and translate energy
between them, in hidden fashion and essentially instantaneously.
This "connection at a distance" directly results in
advanced the mechanism for making one of these quantum potentials,
so it is subject to laboratory test. Further, in that artificial
quantum potential you make, you can put in a hidden EM wave
Whittaker structure - hidden "pipes inside spacetime" itself, so to
speak. Then you have established hidden EM-wave-energy channels
through spacetime, connecting widely separated entities together.
You can then put energy and specific energy patterns - vacuum
engines, if you will - directly through those hidden channels. You
can have the hidden energy emerge at a distant point and interact in
and on a distant physical system there. This distantly-emerging
interaction energy can be positive (disordering, or scattering) or
negative (reordering). Transmitting scattering energy, you get
distant heating - the production of heat energy at a distance.
Transmitting reordering energy, you can extract energy from the
distant object or system through those hidden channels,
accomplishing distant electrostatic cooling.
The other thing to note is
that EM energy transmission through the hidden channel is not
limited to the speed of light. The speed of light refers to energy
transmission through 3-space, and the internal channel refers to
energy transmission around 3-space, or in other words, through
hyperspace. And it's testable on the laboratory bench.
Question6: Are you
saying that real energy can be transmitted faster than the speed of
A: Yes. But
hyperspatially. Not through 3-space, but "around" it.
Again, this means that
it's possible to produce energetic changes in a distant system at a
distant place, without transmitting energy "through space" in the
normal sense. You transmit "around" space, so to speak, and
directly in time or through a higher dimension, depending on
the model you're using to understand this. Further, the speed of the
internal EM energy transmission is not limited to the speed of light.
Whittaker already specifically pointed this out. Quantum mechanics
also predicts instantaneous action-at-a- distance and has
essentially proven it experimentally. Finally, you can
specifically Whittaker-engineer this "hyperspatial" transmission, if
you will, to do essentially whatever you wish to do in that distant
system. It all depends on how far you develop the technology;
the basis is there. Hypothetically, you can eventually even develop
a kind of teleportation. Whittaker transmission through the internal
channel is already "teleportation" of energy, so to speak.
Question7: Does this have
anything to do with Sheldrake's morphogenetic field?
A: Yes indeed.
morphogenetic field is pure-and- simply a species
quantum potential, created amongst the members of a species. As
experiences are met by the individual members, they steadily input
infolded EM structures into the "inner" EM channels of that quantum
potential. Since any infolded EM wave has its phase conjugate
- or time-reversed replica - produced and infolded automatically, a
sort of "negative feedback" corrective EM signal pattern for all
inputs of the bad external EM stuff exists inside the quantum
potential. One can show that, for detrimental changes to the species'
members, time reversal provides infolded signals that represent an
exact counter to the "overstress of the species," so to speak. These
"corrective antidotes" for the overstressed species, however, are in
the virtual state. But as more of the same detrimental changes are
experienced over generations, the countering signal structures
residing in the species quantum potential will be increased over the
same period of time. Gradually the hidden EM structure - which is
like jillions of little "vacuum engines" - is changing and
internally structuring the Schroedinger potential for that species.
Then one day the internal
corrective charge is sufficient to breach the quantum threshold. One
could also say that the spacetime potential occupied by the species
members is now sufficiently curved and structured to serve as a
specific- signal-pattern energetic source for genetic change.
Breaching this threshold causes specific new genetic changes to
occur in the entire species in a single jump. At that point, the
actual genetics of egg fertilization (conception) is altered, and
shortly thereafter members of the species start being born with the
new change, specifically designed to counter or partially counter
the former detrimental aspects in the species overstress. In a
dramatic example, that's how a reptilian species can "suddenly"
develop light, air-filled bones; feathers; and wings, for example,
and change from a reptile to a bird in one single jump.
Sheldrake's morphogenetic field is a species quantum potential and
the charged-up Whittaker structure is the inducing agent.
saying, then, that living systems use this inner, hidden EM
energy channel in addition to the external energy channel that
we know in ordinary external electromagnetics?
A: Absolutely. In
fact, the distinction between a living system and a nonliving system
is precisely the fact that the living system deterministically
utilizes the inner EM energy channels inside Whittaker-structured
scalar potentials. And those scalar EM potentials are
centered on the atomic nuclei of atoms comprising the living
system's molecules, cells, tissues, and mass.
Question9: How does
that relate to present brain-wave research, and measurements of
A: It says that
present research is devoted almost entirely to measuring and
pondering the surface waves in the ocean, so to speak. The mind,
thoughts, emotions, and real living functioning systems are deeply
hidden, underwater waves in that ocean. Science will have to
instrument for detection and recording of the hidden interior
energetics region, or they will never solve the mind/brain/body
problem. And without the interior energetics, they will never
understand life, memory, personality, thought, and primary
biological control, or human intent.
Question10: You are
saying, then, that this hidden internal electromagnetic energy
channel is intimately connected with the mind, life, and
consists of stabilized Whittaker structures inside the living
system's bio-potential. Thoughts are a special
class of changes/waves in that overall Whittaker-structure ensemble.
The personal unconscious is a single small, localized sample
of yet a greater collection that represents even deeper
The conscious mind is
a serial processor - one thing at a time. The unconscious mind
is totally conscious, but it is a parallel processor - jillions of
things at one and the same time. The serial conscious mind can only
make sense of a "single slide in the slide projector" at a time.
When it looks at the unconscious mind, it sees a multitude of slides
in the slide projector simultaneously - hence it just sees blackness,
or nothing recognizable at all.
Jung's collective unconscious, for example, consists of
archetypal infolded EM structures acting in common in an overall bio-quantum-potential
for the entire species. Gaia, the living earth/biosphere, really
does scientifically exist as a common bio-quantum-potential with
infolded living EM structures for the entire earth biosphere. The bio-
potential in a single body is an overall quantum potential that
links and joins all the atoms and cells of the body. The "spirit" of
the biosystem, if you will, is its "living biopotential" - its
living quantum potential. We already know that a potential is
everywhere nonzero all the way out to infinity. So the spirit of the
living system is - in the virtual state - everywhere in the universe
- and everywhen as well.
It's all a giant hologram, not only in space, but in spacetime.
The entire universe is
everywhere alive, with everything. Note that if you simply examine
the "ghost forms" requirement of quantum mechanics, this conclusion
is inescapable. All life is eternal. Nothing is ever lost.
A thought or thoughtform is
just a specific, dynamic Whittaker structure in the hidden EM
channels of the biopotential. Thoughts and thoughtforms are real.
They are virtual spatially, but they occupy one "real" spacetime
dimension, time. Physics and metaphysics share one common,
nonobservable dimension time. So long as physics continues to
have time, which is nonobservable a priori, then it also must
contain everything that is a structure or action in time.
parapsychology, who believe that humans are robots and the mind
is just a meat computer, just have little or no foundations
knowledge. And if you get carried away by the "observable, objective
science" bit, remember that the choice of fundamental physical units
in physics is arbitrary. You can - and it's actually been done -
build all of physics from time as the single fundamental unit. That
means that you can build the whole observable, detectable physics
model out of the totally unobservable and nondetectable. Quantum
mechanics long ago destroyed materialism for all time, but it just
hasn't percolated through the prevailing scientific dogma yet.
With Whittaker EM engineering,
you can conceivably "make" thoughtforms to order, and input them
directly into the mind and longterm memory. If we view the
conscious mind as a special serial computer, we have now found where
the software is - for mind, longterm memory, and personality. As
scalar EM technology develops, we will have direct access to the
software, so to speak, for the very first time. And we will be
able to engineer it at will.
Question11: But is this
good or bad?
A: Actually it's
either, or both. We are describing a set of hidden internal EM
energy structures, the fundamental mechanism for internal EM
structuring, and a tool. A tool is amoral; it has no morality, and
is inherently neither good or bad. The intent of the user of the
tool, however, may be either good or bad. So the tool can always be
used either way, for beneficial purposes or for evil purposes. It's
the hand that wields the knife that is moral or immoral; it is not
the knife. The same cutting tool can be used by the surgeon to heal,
or the murderer to kill. Human intent differentiates amorality into
morality and immorality.
Question12: What is the
biological impact of the forthcoming new technology that directly
accesses and engineers the internal energy regime?
A: It will be both a
tremendous blessing and a terrible curse. It's the most
powerful tool ever conceived. By engineering the
Schroedinger equation, for example, one can theoretically engineer
physical change itself. One can actually engineer physical reality,
change the laws of nature, and determine if a thing shall even
emerge into physical quantum change at all, or if it shall change
its physical form. Mind-wise, eventually one will be able to
directly input material into the mind - whatever is desired.
Education, for example, will simply be achieved by "loading the
proper software." Everyone will be enormously educated, by today's
standards. That should for the first time allow the complete
alleviation of unemployment due to lack of employable skills, for
example. It should be possible to virtually eliminate unemployment
and poverty. Any sort of disease whatsoever - physical or mental -
will be rapidly curable, simply and cheaply. It will be possible to
reverse aging and rejuvenate the person. It will be possible to
regrow limbs and straighten misshapen spines - and directly remove
the causes of mental diseases and cure them as well. Lifespan will
be staggeringly increased, without "old age's debilitation." AIDS,
cancer, leukemia, and genetic diseases will be completely conquered.
The potential for a true golden era is upon us, for all humanity.
On the other hand, it will
also be possible to simply pull out a personality-structure from a
person, without his or her consent, and insert another. Or to alter
a given personality structure by just altering and re-recording the
software. This technological possibility, of course, will certainly
be noticed by would-be egomaniacs and dictators, for it can yield
the ultimate mind control. It will also be possible to
provide direct input inside the mind, surreptitiously, from a
distance and without the knowledge and consent of the individual
affected. This can be beneficial if it's just "instantaneous
telepathy" - instantaneous communications, so to speak, and if it's
desired by the recipient. It can be highly detrimental if it is
undesirable material, or if it's a forced internal change, or
enslavement, or used to overwhelm and destroy the mind, or used to
jam the body's immune system, induce virulent diseases en masse, etc.
Unless the present inhumanity of one human for another is overcome,
future wars are likely to take on aspects that stagger the
imagination. In 1975 Brezhnev called these new mass destruction
weapons of the future "...more frightful than the mind of man has
ever imagined." He should know. When he made the statement, the
Soviets had already been inducing diseases in persons in the
U.S. Embassy in Moscow for nearly 30 years.
Question13: Can you
explain that part about direct, forced input to the mind, just a bit
A: Yes. It
involves a characteristic of the mind and brain that has been
experimentally shown. For example, if anything (thought, feeling,
emotion, image) arises internally in one of the cerebral hemispheres,
that hemispheric personality thinks that it did it. That is, it
thinks that it not only thought the thought, but that it also
created the thought. So if you have a hidden channel to pipe in
inputs, you can take over or implant the thoughts, behavior, and
actions of a person. Or of a very large group of persons. That alone
allows a mind-numbing direct control of behavior externally and from
Question14: Can you
really control behavior electromagnetically? Can you give us an
A: Yes, you can
control it readily and deeply, if you develop and utilize the
internalized EM energy channel technology. As to proof, Delgado
certainly has demonstrated profound control over animal behavior
experimentally, for all the world to see, using implanted probes and
precise injection of EM signals. The Soviet LIDA machine, using a 40
MHz carrier and complex waveforms - and actually the hidden
Whittaker-infolded EM structuring, unknown to Western technologists
- has demonstrated the ability to place a mammal - either a human or
a cat - in a cataleptic state. That state can be induced in a few
minutes exposure and then persists for some minutes after the
stimulus signal is removed. That proves that you can profoundly
alter the mental state, electromagnetically.
Perhaps the very best example
is provided by the two cerebral hemispheres in your own head, or
those in a rat, or those in a cockroach. As we know from split-brain
research, each hemisphere has a separate personality. That's a
separate being, if you will, to put it bluntly. Yet even though you
are two beings in one body, so to speak, you are only conscious of
one being. How is that, you might ask, since both brain halves are
operating? How do you integrate two beings consciously into one
functioning being? Such as is already done in your own head?
The answer is this. Suppose
your left brain sends a signal to your right thumb to move. While
the signal is on the way to the right thumb, the left brain also
sends a replica of the signal over the connecting corpus callosum,
into the right brain half, where it emerges inside. [When the signal
emerges inside a brain half/mind/personality, it thinks that it
itself originated it. That's because it perceives no time delay
between appearance of the signal in its "transmission" section,
e.g., and the appearance of the signal in its "receiver" section.]
The ultimate definition of identity, after all, is the absence of
all distinction. The absence of functional distinction in time
constitutes the creation of identity in time. The whole arises when
and only when distinction between the parts is lost.]
The right thumb is
continually communicating back to the left brain half, telling its
progress. Replicas of those return signals from the thumb are
continually being sent by the left brain across the corpus callosum
into the right brain. The right brain thinks that it originated the
thumb- move-order, and that the right thumb is reporting its
progress. The right brain thinks it did the whole thing itself. A
similar process occurs, of course, from left brain to right brain.
Each inputs to the other, at least insofar as awareness of the order
and the event is concerned. Each thinks that it did it. In that way,
there is a loss of distinction between the parts of the
functionality. Accordingly, there is only one sense of being in the
bi-system, even though there are two separate beings.
It has also been shown that,
when the corpus callosum is severed, the two brain halves now
function much more independently. In that case, two separate
personalities really do emerge and function in one body. That also
has been shown in the laboratory.
Question15: But aren't
you actually saying that the mind and thought, then, are not
really just electrical wiggles in the brain after all? That they
are actually separate from the physical brain, and the brain is
just a special sort of tuner or "workstation"?
real functioning of mind, thought, memory, and personality occurs in
the infolded Whittaker bidirectional EM wave structures of the
scalar potential - its bio-potential. And one of the great
neural scientists has already pointed out that mind and memory are
not precise functions of physical location in the brain.
Question16: Is there
any real proof of the internal energy channel operation of
the mind, or is it just all still a theory or hypothesis?
A: The basis can
be shown, and it is directly subject to laboratory test, with a
decent laboratory and a little effort. Let me give you a very strong
There exists a rare,
completely bafflingly medical phenomenon - which has until recently
been concealed - called hydrancephaly. To the normal
materialistic Western biologist, this condition is astonishing, to
say the least. In hydrancephaly, a person's cranial cavity is filled
almost totally with fluid, not with brain matter. There may be only
5% or so of the brain in there; typically just the small portion on
the tip of the spine. The other 95% of the brain case is filled with
fluid. Yet the individual may be as normal as you or I. Except, of
course, that x-rays of his head will astonish all the doctors. A few
years ago, for example, such a hydrancephalic individual graduated
from a university in Great Britain, with a degree in mathematics.
British news actually made a video documentary on this subject, and
particularly on that individual.
hydrancephaly proves rather conclusively that it isn't really the
brain matter or the electrical wiggles in the two hemispheres that
constitute the mind.Those wiggles normally are correlated with,
and communicate back and forth with, the internal Whittaker dynamics
of the bio- potential. The brain is a special communications and
processing station, interfacing sensors and processed stuff from the
external world to the Whittaker-sets, and outputs from the Whittaker-sets
to the body and cells. If just a small functioning part of this "way
station" remains fully functional, the interfacing still exists.
Question17: Can you
shed any light on the functioning of the fluid that fills 95% of the
brain cavity of a hydrancephalic?
A: Perhaps a little
bit. There's an interesting thing about fluid - about water. The
hydrogen bonding structure of water is enormously complex and richly
varying. Bond- structuring of water constitutes a special kind of "neo-
Whittaker" substructure inside a special kind of potential for that
particular body of water. A glass of water, for example, has an
overall neo-potential comprised of its hydrogen bond structuring.
That water will change its internal bonding structure if you enter
the room, or if you blink your eye while observing it. It
continually adjusts to everything in its surroundings. The reason
is, everything in its environment has charges, and clumps or
orderings or structures of potential. And the internal Whittaker
structures of all those potentials overlap because the potentials
overlap. Therefore the internal bidirectional Whittaker EM waves
intercommute. The internal dynamics of the water receives inputs
from the surroundings this way, and the water's bonding structure
changes accordingly. We've only known the complexity and
richness of this water structuring for less than two decades, and so
far as I know, no one else seems to be considering the Whittaker
infolded EM wave structure aspects of it.
The point is this. In the
fluid inside the head of a functional hydrancephalic, the water
structuring is quite sufficient to provide the rest of the needed "way-station
two-way tuner, processor, and transmitter-receiver." The
reason is quite simple The potential of the fluid constitutes a
partial potential in the overall bio-potential of the body. It's
like the pressure of a mixture of gases the overall pressure
consists of the partial pressures of the component gases. The
Whittaker structures ensure intermingling and intercommunication
through the internal energy channels of the total bio-potential to
all its constituents. Therefore the water structuring of
the fluid in the head of the hydrancephalic serves - bridgewise - as
a substitute brain.
Other supporting evidence, of
course, is that quantum mechanics experiments have essentially
established action- at-a-distance and quantum correlation. The
quantum potential, therefore, is something real and functional after
And even more evidence is
provided by the nature of a linear material versus the nature of a
nonlinear material. However, that would take a book, and is just
too much to cover in this interview. Suffice it to say that a strong
argument can be made from the nonlinear characteristics and
phenomena themselves, such as production of time-reversed waves,
amplification of time-reversed waves, negentropy (re-ordering of
scattering energy), etc.
The bottom line is that
there's certainly enough evidence to substantially support these
hypotheses, and move them from the realm of idle speculation to the
realm of "worthy for further experimentation and development." The
ultimate proof, of course, will be when one demonstrates the actual
production, recording, and functioning of a living mind. With the
internal energy approach, that is hypothetically quite possible, and
will eventually be lab-demonstrated.
Question18: How is this
related to the neurons, synapses, and dendrite firings in the normal
A: The same "internal
electrical structure" thing is true of the brain and its dendrite
firings, EM waves, and tiny but extremely numerous currents and
fields. Take an instantaneous snapshot of all the dendrite firings -
billions of them - frozen for an instant. The actual pattern or
structure represents the internal state of the brain's bio-potential
at that instant. Take another snapshot a moment later. The change of
the internal structuring represents the brain's internal structuring
at a new moment. Interfering (subtracting) the two snapshots
provides a delta that represents the exact and total change that
occurred in the brain-state during that tiny interval between
snapshot one and snapshot two. But since thought itself is a change
in internal brain-state, then the thought patterns during that
interval must be contained in those changes. And of course a myriad
of other brain control actions are in there as well. Commands to
beat the heart, direct biochemistry of cells, etc. To detect the
internal state precisely, one now needs to decompose that delta
pattern into its Whittaker-structure components and sort them all
Question19: How would
one go about detecting the internal state, to get at the actual
A: Well, one has
rather much got involved with
the standard chaos problem. You've got hidden order (the
thoughts) buried up in a lot of extraneous material. In other words,
you're looking at something statistical, and it's got several kinds
of hidden order hidden in there in what to you appears to be a whole
lot of noise. So you do something very similar to what we described
in the snapshot analogy, but apply Whittaker-channel detection at
the same time. Actually, a first step in this direction has been
beautifully done by Dr. Hunt. She divided the external brain-wave
region into several frequency bands. (Actually, harmonic intervals
are best, per Whittaker theory.) She set up individual detectors for
all the frequency channels simultaneously. Then she divided each of
these channels in two branches one branch straight through without a
time delay, and the other delayed by a bit, say, 6 milliseconds or
so. Then she mixed all the delay channels onto all the nondelay
channels, and recorded the superposition. And lo and behold, she got
beautiful traces of hidden chaos in brain wave activity. The traces
exhibited the standard chaos attractors. Her magnificent work is
very strong evidence that the real activity of the mind occurs in
hidden variables, in hidden channels inside the normal "envelope/external
electromagnetics" represented by normal brain wave measurements.
Hunt has shown that there is a hidden, deterministic, dynamic order
"inside" the normal statistical EM brain activity.
Over two decades ago, a
Russian scientist, Lisitsyn, obliquely spoke of Russian
breakthroughs in this area. Lisitsyn stated that the Soviets had "broken
the human brain code." He further stated that some 23 channels were
involved, reaching all the way up to optical frequencies. However,
only 11 of these frequency channels were independent. He also
mentioned that the brain coding did not number over 44 "digits".
Now I interpret his remarks
as indicative of direct application of Whittaker theory. Lisitsyn of
course did not give the details; that's highly classified in the
Soviet Union, as witnessed by the Petukov/Toth incident in Moscow.
However, I interpret Lisitsyn as having obliquely referred to 11
independent Whittaker frequencies - the fundamental frequency and 10
harmonics - that are used by the brain workstation to
intercommunicate between the mind and the external electrical/physical
functioning of the organism. I interpret the remark about 44 digits
to probably mean that there are some 44 different independent
Whittaker spectrum sets, where each spectrum consists of the
fundamental and 10 harmonics. And in each frequency channel of a
set, there are two bidirectional EM waves - actually, an EM wave and
its time-reversed antiwave (phase conjugate replica).
Question20: Can you
tell us something more about detection of standing scalar EM
A: For fundamental
detection of the scalar wave, you must realize that several kinds of
detectors can be utilized. One kind is a spatially-oriented detector,
and detects spatial aspects and changes of the scalar wave and its
internal substructure. The other kind detects variations in the
local rate of flow of time, and then the "finer time wave structure"
of that variation. With either type, the problem has two parts.
Let's look first at the spatially- oriented detector.
First, one must detect the
absolute potential at the point of intersection. Second, in this
detected potential, one must detect its internal, infolded EM
bidirectional wave structure - in short, its Whittaker structure. An
additional requirement, of course, is that the instrument must be
shielded against the effects of spurious EM signals in the area. In
short, it must be in a Faraday cage. Even more than that, one must
be able to vary the grounding potential on the shielding cage. One
must be able to let it float, have it at ambient, or move it to some
A Geiger tube, for example,
will usually detect a strong absolute potential. That is, the
potential increases the charge on the atoms or molecules of the gas
it contains, and at the ionization point, the gas starts to ionize.
The counter, of course, then counts the ion discharges, whose rate
is correlated to the level of ionization, and hence to the strength
of the ionizing agent. Note that Geiger tubes do not necessarily
detect nuclear radiation; they detect ionizing radiation, regardless
of the type. While nuclear radiation is certainly ionizing radiation,
so is strong scalar radiation. Even though the scalar wave is a
standing wave, its increased level of potential can ionize the gas
in the tube. Of course, if the standing scalar potential wave is a
sine wave function of the radial distance from the source, and the
Geiger counter is at the node, it will not read because there is no
difference there from normal ambient vacuum potential.
Note also that the so-called
"microwave radiation" of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow was detected
originally with a nuclear radiation detector - probably a Geiger
counter. Pure microwaves are non-ionizing, and would not have
activated the counter. Shortly I will have a new book out,
Gravitobiology A New Biophysics, which will explain precisely
how the health changes in the Moscow radiation were induced in U.S.
Embassy personnel. In the book we will also explain Kaznacheyev's "death
photons" and the EM induction of disease at a distance. We'll also
explain the mechanism for producing an EM antidote signal for any
disease, known or unknown.
The problem with the Geiger
counter as detector is that it only accomplishes half the job, even
when it works. It doesn't break out and measure the Whittaker
bidirectional EM wave structure of the ionizing potential at all.
Here is a possible scheme for
a better detecting system. Use two detecting probes, some small
distance apart, inside the shield. At each probe point, use a high
input resistance, very low voltage detector - microvolts or
picovolts range, normally. The signals should then be mixed and
another difference frequency detector of similar kind utilized.
Under proper circumstances, this produces a normal EM beat frequency
(via the Aharonov-Bohm effect). The second stage of the detector can
then come into play. The beat frequency is input into a standard
spectrum analyzer, which should detect the components of the
Whittaker spectrum as modulations on the detected Aharonov- Bohm
effect beat frequency.
The disadvantages of this
detector are two-fold. One, the actual ground potential at which the
shield is biased, affects whether or not you get a detection. Second,
it's basically a very short wavelength detector for, say, millimeter
waves to waves in the one meter band. That should be good enough for
scalar communications research, however, and the Soviets have
reported highly significant biological effects of the Lisitsyn kind
at about 2.1 millimeter wavelengths.
For longer wavelengths, one
has to either have rather widely separated instruments operating in
a bistatic reception mode, for the scalar interferometry, or else
use delay- materials and schemes in probes. Another way that can be
worked out is to use a characteristic of nonlinear materials. If a
sine wave is input to a nonlinear material, harmonics are produced.
By tailoring and choosing the materials, one should get appreciable
frequency shifting up the scale via harmonic production.
Another way is to realize
that a standing scalar potential wave can also be considered as a
standing wave in the rate of passage of time. So the presence of a
scalar potential alters the local rate of time passage. But since it
alters time flow, it affects everything else that locally exists in
time - and that's everything. More exactly, there is a stress effect
on the rate of flow of time. And there are certain detectable
functions that occur in detectors and solid state components, for
example, that occur because of the time stream stress changes. I
cannot be more specific, because the effects I know about here were
discovered by John Schnurer and are proprietary to him. But John can
build a detector based on this effect, at least for the overall
potential. It remains to develop detection of the EM substructure
and its spectrum, and he will have a very good scalar EM system
Other things very useful in
developing detectors have been reported by Hunt, Bedini, Beck,
Howonadec, Golden, and others. Golden particularly has a very good
scalar communications detector, and several good scalar
communications transmitters. One of his typical detector systems,
for example, will perform between 20 and 30 dB better for a given
power transmitted than will a normal communication system with high
gain antennas. And, since the detection of scalar involves
outfolding the inner energy spectrum of the Whittaker structure, a
direction finder cannot get a direction fix on the signal
transmitted via the scalar system.
Beck has certainly
demonstrated an extremely sensitive coil of ultrafine wire, that can
often outperform the finest superconductive quantum interference
detector (SQUID). The use of extremely fine wire - and lots of
overlaying coils - drastically reduces or blocks the radial movement
of electrons in any one point in the wire in the coil. Since that's
the way electron current actually moves - the movement down the wire
is due to drift velocity, and certainly is not the signal - Beck's
coil effectively prevents most of the "external electron bleedoff"
from the stabilized scalar potential. Thus he's able to block most
of the external electromagnetics, and thereby retain the inner part
as well. Precisely, his coil is now using gravitons, not photons, to
a significant degree. So the coil as the interaction area of an
instrument is able to hold and pass some of the internalized EM
energy that normally escapes into and through the nucleus only. At
the output of the coil, Beck gets EM from this internal component
that the SQUID doesn't see because it doesn't do the escape-blocking
in its interaction area.
There are other detector
schemes, of course, such as holographic interferometry, but this
should give you an idea of some of the things that have to be done
to perform good laboratory measurement of scalar electromagnetics.
Question21: Could you
return to your discussion of what's wrong with present
electromagnetics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity? Perhaps
you could address them in order.
A: Okay. I've already
stated the case for electromagnetics. Half of it - the really
interesting part, the internal energetics - was discarded by
Heaviside and Gibbs. By discarding the scalar component of the
quaternion, they threw out the internalized EM energy of local
spacetime and its communication with distant spatial points. Since
the localized energy density of spacetime is essentially synonymous
with gravitational potential, they threw out the ability to turn EM
force field energy into gravitational potential energy. They threw
out the interaction and entanglement of EM and gravitation, and
wrote the special subset of Maxwell's theory that is restricted to
the case where gravity and electromagnetics do not interact. As a
subset, their work is perfectly okay. However, a priori you will
never use their approach - nor the applied technology that follows
its principles - to produce electrogravitation, over-unity machines,
tapping of vacuum energy sources, etc. You will never electrically
change the inertia of a body at rest, structure the electric and
magnetic flux itself, or achieve and utilize action at a distance.
And your instruments developed in accord with the Heaviside/Gibbs EM
principles will never detect or measure the mind, thought, and
emotion - for those instruments a priori discard and ignore the
internal energy arena where mind, thought, and emotion reside and
function. And since the externalized EM energy is scattering energy,
energy once scattered will produce entropy - increased disorder, and
only the positive flow of time. And that science and technology will
never be able to translate EM energy into G- energy and vice versa.
Every system built under its principles will be at extreme best a
"break-even" system. It will never produce more energy out than is
input in. It is at best a diode engineering technology.
Question22: What about
present quantum mechanics?
mechanics has a severe foundations problem the missing chaos, or in
other words, the problem of the missing hidden order. Let me
explain how that came about. When physicists were constructing
quantum mechanics, it was of necessity a statistical theory. They
simply lifted the Gibbs thermodynamics statistics, and utilized it
as the quantum statistics. Furthermore, Gibbs statistics was based
on the theory of the random variable; that is, the variables were
considered random. So, because random variable statistics were
utilized, the QM postulate that "quantum change is statistical" was
over-restricted to the special case of "quantum change not only is
statistical, but also is random." The second case, "quantum change
is statistical, but can contain hidden order and be nonrandom," was
thus excluded a priori, simply because of the statistics utilized.
Now the random change hypothesis is easily falsified, as follows If
you collect large numbers of random change, the resulting collection
is still random. The next collection will not necessarily produce
the same collection at all. (In fact, if it does, then this is prima
facie evidence that the variables are not all random.)
What this means is that,if
quantum change is random, then collections of these random tiny
changes could never integrate to provide us the ordered macroscopic
universe we live in and observe. You couldn't have a flower, or
a tree, or anything, for that matter - just total randomness.
Obviously that is not true, or else you and I do not exist and this
macroworld does not exist.
For integration of the
statistical quantum changes to yield an ordered macroscopic universe,
quantum change must contain hidden order. That is, the variables
must be chaotic, not random. If the changes are chaotic, then
integration of them will see large scale forms emerge and stabilize
- which is what we actually observe in physical reality.
So ironically, the biggest
foundations problem in quantum mechanics today is the problem of the
missing chaos! Try as they will, quantum physicists cannot find the
missing hidden order, because they continue to use the Gibbs
statistics that already excludes it. So they now know that somehow
QM is wrong, and many of them fear that this most successful of
physics theories will have to be completely redone.
David Bohm, of course, long
ago pointed out that hidden variables could contain the hidden
order. Actually all of experimental physics is consistent with
his hidden variable theory (HVT). Mainline QM theoreticians, however,
shun hidden variables (and therefore hidden order). They avoid
hidden variable theory by applying a kind of Occam's razor They say
that Bohm's HVT seemingly predicts no new phenomena, so why adopt it
at all, or even seriously investigate it? And since Bohm did not
know how to actually engineer his hidden variables, nothing could be
found experimentally with it that could not also be explained by the
Now this is where Whittaker's
work - and Maxwell's original quaternion theory of EM - saves the
day and decisively decides the issue. Whittaker's hidden variable
theory is directly engineerable on the lab bench. It's testable, and
when applied to quantum mechanics, it predicts hordes of new
phenomena and effects, so it certainly gets by the old "Occam's
razor" saw. When you apply Whittaker's approach to QM, again you
provide testable internal EM bidirectional wave structures to the
scalar potential, including the Schroedinger potential. Whittaker's
work allows direct engineering of quantum change itself, and
constitutes testable hidden order inside the "Gibbs statistics." In
other words, application of the Whittaker work to QM produces a
superset of QM, where the missing chaos is restored.
The postulate that "quantum
change is statistical" now has three special cases, theoretically
(1) the case where no internal order is present, and quantum change
is random; (2) the case where some internal order, but not total, is
present, and quantum change is already chaotic; and (3) the case
where quantum change is perfectly engineered and hence perfectly
ordered and deterministic.
Notice that, by adding the
hidden order and the internalized EM energy, we've now extended both
QM and EM, and unified the two on a common subset each's Whittaker-applied
subset, which is the same subset shared by the two.
Question23: So how
about general relativity? How does it fit in?
A: A similar thing
also happened to general relativity, believe it or not! Einstein
unwittingly restricted general relativity to a subset of the theory
he intended to write. This over-restriction was again an indirect
result of the fundamental Heaviside/Gibbs error in electromagnetics.
view of electromagnetics approximated the classical view. In
classical EM theory, EM and gravitation were mutually exclusive.
That is, the strong EM force was not usable as an agent to curve
Therefore, as a curvature
agent, Einstein only considered the weak gravitational force due to
the attraction of mass. Now the G-force is far, far weaker than the
E-force. For two electrons, for example, the attractive G-force
between them is on the order of only 10exp-42 times as strong as the
electrical repulsion. The G-force is very, very weak! If only the
weak G-force is considered for curving spacetime, then there will
never be an observable spacetime curvature, except in the immediate
vicinity of a very large mass - such as on the surface of the sun or
Einstein reasoned that the
laboratory, and the observer/scientist and instrument, would never
be on the surface of the sun or of a star. Therefore, he reasoned,
the local spacetime -- where the lab, the observer, and the
instruments are -- would never be curved. The local spacetime would
always be flat.
Unfortunately, Einstein then
made a fundamental error. He overgeneralized his thought examination.
He stated one of his fundamental postulates of general relativity as
"The local spacetime is always flat." This is overly restrictive,
and did not follow from his thought process. His postulate can be
more accurately stated as follows "The local spacetime is always
flat, whenever only the weak gravitational force is used for the
agent of curvature and the local region of interest is not near a
large collection of mass."
Notice the difference in the
two statements of the postulate. Einstein's overstatement does not
allow the far stronger EM force to be used for curvature. In effect,
his own overstatement excluded electromagnetics from curvature unity
with gravitation, in his own general relativity theory. Ironically
Einstein then tried for the rest of his life to fit electromagnetics
back in there - never realizing that his own too-strenuous statement
of the flat local spacetime postulate doomed all his efforts to
On the other hand, the
corrected statement of his postulate admits the following corollary
"When a very strong force such as the electromagnetic force is used
for the agent of curvature, the local spacetime may be curved, even
though the local region of interest is not near a large collection
As can be seen, Einstein
unwittingly wrote only a subset of his intended theory. Correct
restatement of his overstated postulate of uncurved spacetime
dramatically extends general relativity, and unites it with
electromagnetics in a unified field theory.
Einstein's error also
excluded the present general relativity from ever being a laboratory
experimental science. If no detectable spacetime curvature is
available locally, it obviously can't be measured in the lab. The
vanishingly small local curvature waves following from mass-
attraction gravitation are still predicted to be several orders of
magnitude below the ability of the finest available detector. And
that detector is a huge, monstrous, very costly thing. A priori, if
the observer's local spacetime is always flat, there is no local
experiment or local apparatus that involves or yields a curved local
modern followers have raised Einsteinian general relativity to a
dogma. They ruthlessly uphold the overstatement of the flat local
spacetime postulate. Physicists who would dispute it - and quite a
few would do so - are essentially barred from obtaining funding. If
they persist with their heresy, their scientific stature is lost,
and they are ostracized and cut off economically. Simply read
Santilli's book, if you wish a clear inside picture.
Contrary to the scientific propaganda,
orthodox science is ruthless in defending its doctrine against
all would-be heretics. Much of science has been converted to a
religion, instead of a science. Any person knowledgeable of
scientific history can cite numerous examples of scientific
suppression, character assassination, and essentially banishment.
Gauss's nonlinear geometry, Wegener's continental drift, Mayer's
discovery of the conservation of energy, Ovshinsky's amorphous
semiconductors, physical therapy, the EKG, and the clinical use of
hypnosis come readily to mind. Scientists form a distribution, just
like any other group. Some of them are saints. Some of them are
devils. The broad majority is neither, but is made up of just
ordinary people like you and me, doing a specialized job. Every
scientific model is known to be falsifiable and imperfect in the
first place, if you believe Godel's theorem. Scientific method does
not yield total truth anyway, by its own assertion; at best it
yields a partial truth. By the Heisenberg uncertainty principle,
every measurement distorts the entity with which the instrument
interacts, changing what actually appears to be measured. Real
scientists know that scientific models are progressive. For any
model, sooner or later a better one, an improvement, will be found.
At any rate, when one looks
at Maxwell's quaternion theory, the scalar component captured the
ability to enfold and utilize the strong electromagnetic force to
make a trapped potential filled with a structure of dynamic EM
vector energy. However, if the translation components of the
quaternion were zeroed, the system of trapped spatiotemporal energy
did not translate spatially, but only temporally. That, of course,
is a scalar EM potential without an external force-field gradient.
Since it is really trapped energy that gravitationally attracts
other trapped energy, then all potentials are gravitational - as is
In fact, in 1968 Sakharov
pointed out that gravitational field is not actually a primary field
of nature. Instead, it's always a conglomerate produced from other
fields. If his hypothesis is true, then to the first order gravity
should be composed of electromagnetics, since it's the strongest
force we normally will be able to meet or utilize.
Maxwell's quaternions and
Whittaker's profound two papers directly show that. They also show
how to engineer all this on the laboratory bench. So the Whittaker
scalar EM approach is testable, which meets the major criterion for
the difference between a hypothesis and a theory. Any decent
university physics and/or electromagnetics staff who put their minds
to it can test the approach.
Question24: Are there
other physicists or scientists to whom we should also give credit
for these things?
A: Yes. I'd like
to mention that
Nikola Tesla experimentally discovered the standing scalar EM
potential wave on the night of July 3-4, 1899, in his Colorado
Springs laboratory. He found it being radiated from a traveling
thunderstorm. He recognized it as an "electromagnetic sound wave".
This was four years before, unknown to the world, Whittaker wrote
and published the precise theory for that same electrogravitational
wave. Tesla always stated that, in the remarkable systems he later
referred to, he was not using Hertzian waves. Rather, he pointed out,
he was using EM sound waves - which must be modeled longitudinally.
Today we know Tesla was correct - and all his detractors were wrong.
I'd also like to point out
the patents and work of Hooper. Hooper seems to be the only
physicist who ever methodically investigated EM stresses,
structuring of those stresses, and the gravitational implications of
those stresses in the laboratory.
I'd like to also point out
Sakharov, and honor him for his clear statement that gravitation
is not primary, but is a conglomerated field made from other fields.
One should also point out the explosive progress made in stochastic
electrodynamics as a result of Sakharov's suggestion, by Hal Puthoff
and others. And one should definitely honor scientists such as
Peter Graneau, who have struggled to point out the foundations
problems of electromagnetics and experimentally back up their
And finally I'd like to
mention that I've been privileged to work with some extraordinary
inventors. In deference to their requests, I will not give a
straightforward list of them at this time. But a great deal of any
insight I may have gained is in large part due to painstaking,
maddening, persistent experiments they have done in the thousands.
We will have more to say - and powerfully - about their actual
contributions at a later date, hopefully later this year. Lots of
other brilliant inventors - Moray and
come readily to mind - have also struggled in this field and
produced astonishing and unrewarded results.
Question25: Can you
spell out again what effect excluding the internal EM energy
had on physics, as simply as possible, and how that is related to
A: The thing that
casting out the internal order and internal structure of the local
ST does, is to remove any consideration of hidden, deterministic
variables that could be manipulated to create and control quantum
As can be seen, then, in the
physical world scalar quantities are very often really zero vector
systems, where the "scalar" or motionless system is actually filled
with hosts of smaller "vector" things in violent motion. We have to
be very careful, therefore, when we apply mathematics (which does
not decompose fundamental scalars into vectors, or identify them as
vector zeros) to a physical situation. To use an extreme example,
two elephants pushing strongly head-on against each other may
produce a "two-elephant" system of opposing forces (vectors), where
the system is stationary. The system is thus a zero resultant vector
system, whose motion is represented by a vector zero. The same would
be true for two fleas pushing against each other and not moving as a
system; the system would be a zero resultant vector system, whose
motion is represented by a vector zero.
And here's where the
mathematics betrays us, if accepted unQuestioningly. In vector
analysis, all vector zeros are identical. Here we are saying that
the translatory motions of the flea system and the elephant system
are the same. That's true, but there's a whale of a lot of
difference in the two systems that must be accounted for physically!
If you don't believe that, put yourself in between the two pushing
elephants, and see if that's the same as being between the two
pushing fleas! You'll certainly notice a lot more stress on you from
the elephants than from the fleas.
That illustrates a
fundamental problem with vector analysis. In the concepts of the
math itself, one conceives a "vector space" as a sort of "place
where one can put vectors." Further, no matter how many vectors we
put in there, or how they interact, the vector space itself is never
under any stress. In other words, in that space, elephant-pushing
and flea-pushing are identically the same. And that's the problem.
When vector analysis is applied to physical situations, imbedded
inside the mathematics of vector analysis itself is the absolute
discarding of the stress of local space or spacetime, resulting from
the interaction of vectors representing interacting motional
Now in quaternions, that is
not the case. Quaternions that interact capture this "local stress
of spacetime" and "locally trapped energy of spacetime" in the
scalar component, inside it. When the motional parts of interacting
quaternions produce a motionless or translationless state for the
interacting parts as a system, the stress, energy, and exact
geometric patterning of the interactants that are now locally
trapped in spacetime is gathered in and accounted for. The motional
aspect may go to zero, but the scalar aspect will capture not only
magnitude but internal motion and the exact dynamic structure of
that internal motion.
incorporate a beautiful hidden variable theory, analogous to Bohm's
beautiful work. They incorporate two channels the external energy
channel (which is addressed, for example, by classical Heaviside/Gibbs
EM theory), and also a hidden internal energy channel (which is not
addressed by Heaviside/Gibbs). Quaternions also incorporate
hyperspatial aspects, since they are an extension to complex
number theory. Notice that Heaviside had to stick back in complex
numbers, to get his spatial vectors to unite magnetism and
electricity. So he essentially added one extra dimension, typified
by the first hypernumber, the square root of minus one. Quaternions
already had that in there, and a lot more that Heaviside threw out.
Question26: Would you
sum up how general relativity, electromagnetics, and quantum
mechanics are unified by the Whittaker approach?
A: Yes. Applying
Whittaker's work to each of the three, a superset of it is produced.
The new superset has two subsets the present discipline and the
extension containing internal EM energy and hidden variable theory.
Since all three extensions are actually the same thing, then all
three supersets superpose on the common extension set. Each of the
present three disciplines is revealed to be a special case, which
unfortunately omitted the unifying extension set. It's like a
topless cardboard box that you've cut the bottom out and outfolded
the sides separately. To be joined, those separate sides need the
bottom of the box. Whittaker provides the bottom. And it's testable.
Question27: Are there
any other fundamental things from all this that you'd like to point
out, that you haven't mentioned, that follow from the eventual
development of this new physics?
A: Several. Please
notice that Whittaker's work and the characteristics of Maxwell's
scalar component of the quaternion allow the direct
electromagnetic engineering of the vacuum. In fact, they allow
the actually structuring and variation of massless electric charge
flux itself. Now, in the new approach, one electron can be quite
different from another, because its electric charge flux can be
varied and patterned. Not only can its overall electrical charge be
varied, but its charge can be dynamically structured. Now the charge
of an electron or other fundamental particle can vary, and the
charge flux of a single particle (or a group) can be spatially
structured - or activated.
The activation concept, for
example, allows an immediate and testable explanation of the
mechanism by means of which
said about water structuring and hydrancephaly. A chemical
compound has a deterministic infolded EM Whittaker structure. If you
make a solution of the compound, you change this hidden internal
energy structure of the fluid. If you then get rid of the
physical carrier - the mass of the original compound - and just
leave the inner energy structure for that compound, you have
homeopathy. Chemistry is totally due to charge and charge
distribution. In homeopathy you're retaining the charge template
in the potential, and that affects charges in the treated body just
like the actual medication. In fact better, because you now do not
have the "physical residue" to worry with, but do things directly.
These new concepts are profound and controversial changes to the
present foundations assumptions of physics and biology.
In the new approach, you
can't just automatically apply random variable statistics. You have
to apply chaos. In structuring the vacuum's virtual photon exchange
with the mass of a charged particle, we have moved to a completely
new and much more fundamental level of engineering. Now the massless
virtual particle charge flux can be activated with a particular
dynamic structure - a vacuum engine, if you will - to perform a
special job. Or we can activate a local spacetime itself, curving it
and internally structuring that curvature to our will. That locally
curved spacetime then becomes a continuing, inexhaustible source of
a specialized vacuum engine or engines. We can tailor the local
vacuum so as to be able to violate any and all of the present
conservation laws, not just two out of three as the present CPT
theorem permits. Literally we can use the vacuum's incredibly
powerful flux to produce localized vacuum engines. We can reach
directly into the atomic nuclei with magic, gentle, accurately
We can for the first time
begin to do actual tailoring and engineering of the nucleus
itself. We can further directly collect and integrate virtual state
energy forms, which in QM are called "ghost forms." Literally,
anything at all can be materialized and brought into physical
reality, or dematerialized so as to disappear from physical reality.
And we shall be able to engineer and change the local laws of nature,
since we can directly engineer and control the Schroedinger equation,
the quantum potentials, and the entire local vacuum potential in all
its partial potential parts.
Whether we're ready or not,
God has now seen fit to hand to humankind the ability to engineer
its own physical reality and its own destiny. We can make of the
new engineered reality a heaven or a hell. Whichever we do, we will
reap the benefits or face the consequences. It would indeed be
wonderful if, for the first time, we could develop this powerful new
tool to save humankind rather than destroy it.