|
Time Travel Research Center © 2005 Cetin
BAL - GSM:+90 05366063183 - Turkey/Denizli
Apollo Expeditions to the Moon
CHAPTER 2
DETERMINING SATURN'S CONFIGURATION
The first launch of the Saturn booster was still five months away when,
on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy proposed that the United States
commit itself to land a man on the Moon "in this decade". For this ambitious
task a launch vehicle far more powerful than our eight-engine Saturn would
be needed. To determine its exact power requirements, a selection had to be
made from among three operational concepts for a manned voyage to the Moon:
direct ascent, Earth orbit rendezvous (EOR), and lunar orbit rendezvous
(LOR).
|
Dr. von Braun, standing next to one
of the five engines at the after end of the Saturn V vehicle's first
stage (on display at the Alabama Space Museum), provides a scale
reference for the humain figures shown alongside two of the rockets in
the drawing below. The sequence of launch vehicles of ever-increasing
size and power that led from the 46-foot-high V-2 rocket through the
Mercury and Gemini boosters to the 363-foot Saturn V is drawn here at a
single scale. |
|
|
With direct ascent, the entire spacecraft would soft-land on the Moon
carrying enough propellants to fly back to Earth. Weight and performance
studies showed that this would require a launch vehicle of a lift-off thrust
of 12 million pounds, furnished by eight F-1 engines. We called this
hypothetical launch vehicle Nova. The EOR mode envisioned two somewhat
smaller rockets that were to rendezvous in Earth orbit where their payloads
would be combined. In the LOR mode a single rocket would launch a payload
consisting of a separable spacecraft toward the Moon, where an onboard
propulsion unit would ease it into orbit. A two-stage lunar module (LM)
would then detach itself from the orbiting section and descend to the lunar
surface. Its upper stage would return to the circumlunar orbit for
rendezvous with the orbiting section. In a second burst of power, the
propulsion unit would finally drive the reentry element with its crew out of
lunar orbit and back to Earth.
As all the world knows, the LOR mode was ultimately selected. But even after
its adoption, the number of F-1 engines to be used in the first stage of the
Moon rocket remained unresolved for quite a while. H.H. Koelle, who ran our
Project Planning Group at Marshall, had worked out detailed studies of a
configuration called Saturn IV with four F-l's, and another called Saturn V
with five F-l's in its first stage. Uncertainty about LM weight and about
propulsion performance of the still untested F-1 and upper-stage engines,
combined with a desire to leave a margin for growth, finally led us to the
choice of the Saturn V configuration.
|
The stack: the three-stage launch
vehicle, Saturn V, surmounted by its payload, the Apollo spacecraft. The
greater part of the launch vehicle consists of tankage for the fuel and
for the oxidant, LOX (liquid oxygen), used in all three Saturn V stages.
The powerful F-1 engines of the first stage burn kerosene to produce a
combined thrust of 7.5 million pounds. The fuel for the J-2 engines of
the two upper stages is liquid hydrogen. The combined thrust of the
second stage's five engines is just over a million pounds, or five times
that of the third stage's single J-2 engine. Development of the original
hydrogen tanks was difficult because the low boiling point of hydrogen
(-253 °C) required insulation sufficient to prevent transfer of heat
from the outside and the comparatively warm (-183 °C) liquid oxygen.
|
Despite the higher power offered by liquid hydrogen, Koelle's studies
indicated that little would be gained by using it in the first stage also,
where it would have needed disproportionately large tanks. (Liquid hydrogen
is only one twelfth as dense as kerosene, so a much larger tank volume would
have been required.) In all multistage rockets the upper stages are lighter
than the lower ones. Thus heavier but less energetic kerosene in the first
stage, in combination with lighter but more powerful hydrogen in the upper
stages, made possible a better launch-vehicle configuration.
Saturn V, as it emerged from the studies, would consist of three stages-all
brand new. The first one, burning kerosene and oxygen, would be powered by
five F-1 engines. We called it S-IC. The second stage, S-11, would need
about a million pounds of thrust and, if also powered by five engines, would
call for the development of new 200,000-pound hydrogen-oxygen engines. A
single engine of this thrust would just be right to power the third stage.
The Saturn l's S-IV second stage was clearly not powerful enough to serve as
the Saturn's third one. A much larger tankage and at least thirteen of Pratt
& Whitney's little LR-10 engines would be required; this did not appear very
attractive.
When bids for the new J-2 engine were solicited, Pratt & Whitney with its
ample liquid-hydrogen experience was a strong contender. But when all the
points in the sternly controlled bidding procedure were counted, North
American's Rocketdyne Division won again.
|
|
|
North American had been involved in the development of liquid fuel rocket
engines since the immediate postwar years and the Navajo long range ramjet
program. The engines it developed for the Navajo booster and their offspring
later found their way into the Atlas, Redstone, Thor, and Jupiter programs.
For the testing of these engines NAA's Rocketdyne Division had acquired a
boulder-strewn area high in the Santa Susana mountains, north of Los
Angeles, that had previously served as rugged background for many a Western
movie. The Santa Susana facility would henceforth serve not only for the
development of the new J-2 engine, but also for short duration "battleship"
testing of the five-engine cluster of these engines powering the S-11 stage.
(Safety and noise considerations ruled out the use of Santa Susana for the
1.5-million-pound-thrust F-1 engine. Test stands for its development were
therefore set up in the Mojave desert, adjacent to Edwards Air Force Base.)
|
|