Time Travel Research Center © 2005 Cetin BAL - GSM:+90  05366063183 - Turkey / Denizli 

The Michelson-Morley Experiment

 

  In 1887, Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley tried to measure the speed of the ether. The concept of the ether was made in analogy with other types of media in which different types of waves are able to propagate; sound waves can, for example, propagate in air or other materials. The result of the Michelson-Morley experiment was that the speed of the Earth through the ether (or the speed of the ether wind) was zero. Therefore, this experiment also showed that there is no need for any ether at all, and it appeared that the speed of light in vacuum was independent of the speed of the observer! Michelson and Morley repeated their experiment many times up until 1929, but always with the same results and conclusions. Michelson won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1907.

 

The ether was a hypothetical medium in which it was believed that electromagnetic waves (visible light, infrared radiation, ultraviolet radiation, radio waves, X-rays,  -rays, ...) would propagate.

The Postulates of Special Relativity

On June 30, 1905 Einstein formulated the two postulates of special relativity:

1. The Principle of Relativity
The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference.

2. The Constancy of Speed of Light in Vacuum
The speed of light in vacuum has the same value c in all inertial frames of reference.

 

The speed of light in vacuum c (299792458 m/s) is so enormous that we do not notice a delay between the transmission and reception of electromagnetic waves under normal circumstances.

The speed of light in vacuum is actually the only speed that is absolute and the same for all observers as was stated in the second postulate.

The Postulates of Special Relativity

Inertial Coordinate Systems

            
 

Actually, Einstein was not influenced so much by the Michelson-Morley experiment at the time when he wrote down The Postulates of Special Relativity as he was by his so-called "Gedankenexperimenten" (imaginary "experiments" in his head) and by Ernst Mach and his principle, Mach's principle1, as well as by Poincaré and his book La Science et l'Hypothèse.

1Mach's principle: The inertial forces experienced by a body in nonuniform motion are determined by the quantity and distribution of matter in the Universe.

 

From the first postulate, it follows that there is no coordinate system which is in absolute rest. All motion with constant speed is relative and any coordinate system moving with constant speed (relative to the "fixed stars") is called an inertial coordinate system (or inertial frame [of reference]).

Two inertial frames A and B are moving with constant speed relative to each other. An observer at rest in A will say that objects at rest in B are moving with respect to A. On the other hand, an observer at rest in B will say that it is the objects at rest in A that are moving with respect to B. Motion is relative!

The Postulates of Special Relativity

Simultaneity

 

 
One of the most important concepts in special relativity is the one of simultaneity. Two physical events that occur simultaneously in one inertial frame are only simultaneous in any other inertial frame if they occur at the same time and at the same place. Time is relative!

The two figures to the left, seen from two different inertial frames, help clarify the concept of simultaneity:

Top figure:
In the inertial frame of the wagon, the lamps are switched on simultaneously and the two light impulses reach the girl at the same time.

Bottom figure:
In the inertial frame of the observer outside the wagon, it seems that the left lamp is switched on first, although for the girl in the wagon the lamps are switched on simultaneously.

 
   
 

Transformations relate quantities in sytems that are in relative motion.

 

A peculiar effect of Einstein's postulates is the transformation that connects space-time in two inertial frames. Such transformations are called Lorentz transformations.

The standard Lorentz transformation in the x direction is (for reference also the classical Galilei transformation is included):

Lorentz transformation (special relativity) Galilei transformation (classical Newtonian mechanics)

where is the Lorentz factor. Note that the spatial coordinates (y and z) perpendicular to the direction of motion (x) are unchanged. In the classical limit , which means that , special relativity is equivalent with classical Newtonian mechanics. Furthermore, note that , i.e. time is relative in special relativity.

Directly from Lorentz transformations, one obtains the concepts of length contraction, time dilation, relativistic Doppler effect, and relativistic addition of velocities.

 

Lorentz Transformations

Length Contraction (or Lorentz Contraction)

          

Suppose that a ruler of rest length  is moving with constant speed v in the direction of its own length with respect to an observer. The observer, however, will observe the length to be

This formula is the so-called length contraction formula. Note that   for all speeds , which means that the ruler is contracted according to the observer. Moving rulers are shorter! Note also, that the spatial dimensions perpendicular to the direction of motion, are not affected by the length contraction.

Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity

One of the peculiar aspects of Einstein's theory of special relativity is that the length of objects moving at relativistic speeds undergo a contraction along the dimension of motion. An observer at rest (relative to the moving object) would observe the moving object to be shorter in length.

 

Lorentz Transformations

Length Contraction
the Car that Does or Does Not Fit into the Garage

  The length contraction is no "illusion"; it is real in every way. Consider the "unrealistic" situation of a man driving a car of rest length 4 m wanting to get it into a 2 m garage.

He will drive at approximately 0.866 c in order to make = 2, so that his car contracts to 2 m. (It will be good to have a massive block of concrete at the end of the garage in order to ensure that there is no question that the car finally stops in the inertial frame of the garage, or vice versa.) Thus, the man drives his (now contracted) car into the garage and his gentle wife quickly closes the door!

When the car stops in the inertial frame of the garage, it is, in fact, "rotated in space-time" and will tend to obtain, if it can, its original length relative to the garage. Thus, if it survived, it must now either bend or burst the door.

At this moment a "paradox" might occur to the reader: What about the symmetry of this problem? Relative to the driver, will not the garage be only 1 m long?

Yes, of course!

How can a 4 m long car get into a 1 m long garage?

Let us consider the situation in the inertial frame of the car. The open garage now comes towards the car. Because of the concrete wall, the garage will keep on going even after the crash with the car, taking the front of the car with it. But the back of the car is still at rest; it cannot yet "know" that the front has crashed, because of the finite speed of propagation of information. Even if the "signal" (in this case the elastic shock wave) propagates along the car with the speed of light, that signal has 4 m to propagate against the garage front's 3 m, before reaching the back of the car. This race would be a dead heat if v were 0.75 c, but now v is approximately 0.866 c. Thus, the car more than just gets into the garage!

Lorentz Transformations

Time Dilation

 
 
  Moving clocks record their own proper time. (The proper time is the time recorded by a clock, which moves along with the considered object.) The proper time interval recorded by a clock moving with constant speed v relative to an inertial frame A is given by

,

where is the coordinate time interval recorded by clocks at rest in A, i.e.,

.

Hence for all and moving clocks "run slow." This is the phenomenon of time dilation.

Muons are elementary particles that can be produced when primary cosmic rays hit the atmosphere of the Earth. The muons are created at an altitude of around 15 km and the lifetime of the muons (i.e., the time which the muons live in their own rest frame) is approximately 0 = 2.210-6 s. In classical Newtonian mechanics, this would mean that the muons could in average move approximately c0 = 660 m before they decay and would not be observed on Earth. However, a large fraction of the muons do reach the surface of the Earth.

How can this be explained?

Well, this can be explained in principle in two ways - by either using length contraction or time dilation. Assume that the muons move with a speed v close to that of light, e.g., v = 0.999 c.

Time dilation: In the frame of the Earth, the lifetime of the muons will be  = 0 (v), which is approximately 22 0. This means that the muons move the distance v = 0.99922660 m (approximately 15 km) in the frame of the Earth, which is in principle the thickness of the atmosphere.

Length contraction: In the rest frame of a muon, the thickness of the atmosphere is about 10 km/22 = 450 m. But during the lifetime of the muon, the Earth will move the distance v0 = 0.999660 m (approximately 660 m) in the frame of the muon, which is longer than 450 m.

Lorentz Transformations

Relativistic Doppler Effect

 

If you are driving towards a red traffic light ( = 650 nm) at a speed of approximately v = 0.17 c, then the light from the traffic light will actually appear to be green (' = 550 nm)! (0.17 c is approximately 5.0107 m/s.)

The Doppler effect: Motion towards or away from a source will cause a change in the observed frequency (or wavelength) as compared to the emitted frequency. All wave phenomena (e.g., water, sound, and light) behave in this way.

We will discuss below the Doppler effect and the concepts related to it as well as some formulas when relativistic effects are considered.

Suppose a source (for example a lamp or even better, a laser) emits light of frequency (or wavelength , remember that = c). Then, an observer moving with a speed v away from the source, will observe the frequency

.

This formula is usually called the relativistic Doppler formula. Note that ' < for all 0 < < c, i.e., the frequency which the observer sees, is smaller than the "original" frequency in the inertial frame of the source. Thus, the observer moving away from the source will see a redshift in the frequency of the light, since light with lower frequencies are "more red" and light with higher frequencies are "more blue." On the other hand, an observer moving towards the source will see a corresponding blueshift. Note that it is only the relative speed that matters; an observer at rest in an inertial frame looking at a source moving away from him/her, would also observe a redshift.

Lorentz Transformations

Relativistic Addition of Velocities

Imagine that you are standing between two space-ships moving away from you. One space-ship moves to the left with a speed of 0.75 c (relative to you) and the other one moves to the right also with a speed of 0.75 c (relative to you).

At what speed will each space-ship see the other moving away? 0.75 c + 0.75 c = 1.5 c?
No, their relative speed will be 0.96 c (according to the relativistic addition of velocities), and it cannot, of course, be faster than the speed of light c.

In classical Newtonian mechanics, two different velocities and are added together by the formula

,

where is the sum of the two velocities. However, in special relativity, the velocities are added together as

.

This formula is called the relativistic addition of velocities.

Note that if   = c and/or = c, then = c, and for small velocities << c, then the classical formula is regained.

Lorentz Transformations

Space-Time and Minkowski Space

   

In classical Newtonian mechanics space the three-dimensional "world" is a place where all the events occur and time is absolute and the same for everybody. Space and time are separate and independent of each other and they cannot be mixed in any way.

In special relativity, however, space and time are just different coordinates of the so-called space-time, i.e., space and time merge together into a four-dimensional "world". The space coordinates and the time coordinate are mixed up together by the so-called Lorentz transformations. Every event corresponds to a point in space-time. In the words of Minkowski: "Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality."

In classical Newtonian mechanics, we measure distances between two points by the formula

2 = (x1 - x2)2 + (y1 - y2)2 + (z1 - z2)2,

where (x1, y1, z1) and (x2, y2, z2) are the coordinates of the two points. This is possible, since we have an absolute concept of simultaneity. In special relativity, however, the interval between two events is defined by

s2 = c2 (t1 - t2)2 - (x1 - x2)2 - (y1 - y2)2 - (z1 - z2)2,

where (t1, x1, y1, z1) and (t2, x2, y2, z2) are the coordinates of the two events. Note that s2 can in fact be negative! If we consider two events separated infinitesimally, (t, x, y, z) and (t + dt, x + dx, y + dy, z + dz), then the interval becomes

ds2 = c2 dt2 - dx2 - dy2 - dz2.

This "distance" formula is called the Minkowski metric and the corresponding four-dimensional "world" is called the Minkowski space-time or just the Minkowski space.

The Twin Paradox

We should state from the very beginning that the twin paradox is actually no paradox at all. The "paradox" can be clarified as follows: A pair of twins, Adam and Eve, are thinking of what will happen to their ages if one of them will go away from Earth on a space journey. Will Eve for example be younger, older, or have the same age as her brother if she leaves Earth with a space-ship and then returns after some time?

Actually, Eve will be younger than her brother when she returns to Earth. The reason is that Eve is not in the same inertial frame all the time.

Assume that Adam and Eve are equipped with two watches (one each) that are synchronized before Eve leaves on her space journey. When Eve returns to Earth and Adam, the time   has passed according to Adam's watch, but only the time   according to Eve's watch. Thus, Eve is younger than Adam, when the two twins meet again after Eve's space journey.

However, can you not turn the discussion around and say that Eve has been at rest in her space-ship while Adam has been on a "space journey" with planet Earth? In that case, Adam must be younger than Eve at the reunion!

If these discussions were both correct, then Adam should be both older and younger than Eve at the same time. But both these discussions are not correct. Adam is at rest all the time on Earth, i.e., he is in the same inertial frame all the time, but Eve is not (as was stated above). Eve will feel forces when her space-ship accelerates and retards, and Adam will not feel such forces.

P.S. Eve's space-ship has to consume fuel, which means that it costs to keep yourself young!

Energy is Equivalent to Mass

Energy and mass are related to each other by the well-known formula E0= mc2, where E0 is the rest energy, m is the mass, and c is the speed of light in vacuum. This means that mass and energy are equivalent.

The 'effective' mass M of an object moving relative to an observer at rest is given by

where E is the energy of the object and m is the mass of the object. This formula is called the relativistic mass formula.

Special Relativity as a Tool

At speeds close to the speed of light in vacuum c relativistic effects become important to consider. Such speeds are normally not encountered in everyday life. However, special relativity is used by scientists when doing calculations in, e.g., particle kinematics, since the particles often have speeds close to the speed of light in vacuum. Also in space physics, special relativity is an important tool.

In 1928, the brilliant English physicist P.A.M. Dirac unified the quantum theory of W. Heisenberg with special relativity in two papers named "The Quantum Theory of the Electron." He received the Nobel Prize in Physics for his contribution as early as 1933. He shared the prize with the Austrian physicist E. Schrödringer, who played a major role in the development of quantum mechanics. At a conference dedicated to the one-hundredth anniversary of Einstein's birth, Dirac said: "Right from the beginning of quantum mechanics, I was very much concerned with the problem of fitting it in with relativity. This turned out to be very difficult, except in the case of a single particle, where it was possible to make some progress. One could find equations for describing a single particle in accordance with quantum mechanics, in agreement with the principle of special relativity. It turned out that this provided an explanation of the spin of the electron." The equation that Dirac was talking about is today known as the Dirac equation and this is the equation describing the dynamics of particles with spin 1/2. Furthermore, Dirac said: " Also, one could develop the theory a little further and get to the idea of antimatter. The idea of antimatter really follows directly from Einstein's special theory of relativity when it is combined with the quantum mechanics of Heisenberg. There is no escape from it."

History of Special Relativity

Einstein was far from being the only person who contributed to the development of the theory of special relativity. However, he was the one who put everything together. Some important years:

        
1687
Sir Isaac Newton published his book Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (or just Principia). In classical Newtonian mechanics, time was universal and absolute.
 
1873
James Clerk Maxwell completed his theory of electromagnetism. This theory turned out to be compatible with special relativity, even though special relativity was not known at that time.
 
1887
The famous Michelson-Morley experiment was performed by Albert Abraham Michelson and Edward Williams Morley. In the same year, during studies of the Doppler effect, Woldemar Voigt wrote down what were later to be known as the Lorentz transformations. The Lorentz transformations were also written down in 1898 by Joseph Larmor and in 1899 by Hendrik Antoon Lorentz.
 
1898
Jules Henri Poincaré said that "... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals."
 
1904
Poincaré came very close to special relativity: "... as demanded by the relativity principle the observer cannot know whether he is at rest or in absolute motion."
 
1905
On June 5, Poincaré finished an article in which he stated that there seems to be a general law of Nature, that it is impossible to demonstrate absolute motion. On June 30, Einstein finished his famous article On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, where he formulated the two postulates of special relativity. Furthermore, in September, Einstein published the short article Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon Its Energy-Content? In which he derived the formula E0=mc2.
 
1908
Max Planck wrote an article on special relativity. He was the second person after Einstein who wrote an article about this theory. In the same year, Hermann Minkowski also published an important article about special relativity.
 
1915
On November 25, nearly ten years after the foundation of special relativity, Einstein submitted his paper The Field Equations of Gravitation for publication, which gave the correct field equations for the theory of general relativity (or general relativity for short). Actually, the German mathematician David Hilbert submitted an article containing the correct field equations for general relativity five days before Einstein. Hilbert never claimed priority for this theory.

Hiçbir yazı/ resim  izinsiz olarak kullanılamaz!!  Telif hakları uyarınca bu bir suçtur..! Tüm hakları Çetin BAL' a aittir. Kaynak gösterilmek şartıyla  siteden alıntı yapılabilir.

The Time Machine Project © 2005 Cetin BAL - GSM:+90  05366063183 -Turkiye/Denizli 

Ana Sayfa / index /Roket bilimi / E-Mail /CetinBAL/Quantum Teleportation-2   

Time Travel Technology /Ziyaretçi Defteri /UFO Technology/Duyuru

Kuantum Teleportation /Kuantum Fizigi /Uçaklar(Aeroplane)

New World Order(Macro Philosophy)/Astronomy