THE
SUPERPOWERS OF THE HUMAN BIOMIND
vis
a vis
THE
PROBABILITIES OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL SUPERPOWERS

ORIENTATION
and INTRODUCTORY
Ingo
Swann (08Feb01)
A
dispassionate survey of definitions of the human mind reveals that
although a small variety of its aspects are identified, the sum of
all of the definitions leaves many more refined aspects in the shadows.
This includes modern scientific definitions, and even occult
and esoteric definitions as well.
None of the definitions of the mind are wrong per se, but the definitional
process of identifying the larger nature of the mind is incomplete,
and probably vastly so.
One reason for this is that such definitions are NOT derived from
or based upon visible functions and attributes of the mind itself.
Instead, and as will be elaborated in Part 1 to follow, the definitions
that do come into existence are set up by this or that societal order,
and so the definitions usually reflects the limits of knowledge within
each of those orders.
This clearly implies that definitions of mind on Earth are little
more than socio-determined ones. They are based on societal
concepts and not on impartial and full observations of mind itself,
which transcends all such concepts.
The human mind, both in essence and in manifest functions, DOES transcend
all socio-determined situations - BECAUSE all such situations are
products of the overall human mind itself.
In the larger perspective of this, it can therefore be understood
that ANY definitions of mind that are socially derived merely reflect
some kind of socio-control agenda regarding how the mind should or
should not be thought of, as contrasted to what mind actually is in
all its magnificence and potential powers.
If we can think that any definitions of mind that we learn about via
education have been established merely within self-limiting contexts
of various kinds of socio-control agendas, then we would expect to
discover that mind has NOT been examined and defined at the all-inclusive
human species level.
In fact, there would be no apparent reason to undertake such an examination
– in the absence of factors that might make it NECESSARY to
do so.
This
is much the same as saying that Earth societies would separately continue
to identify and define mind only via the thinking-lenses of those
societies, for there is no obvious reason to do otherwise.
However,
it could occur that Earth societies might encounter ANOTHER species
having powers of mind at least commensurate with, but perhaps advanced
beyond our own species.
Of
course, this kind of encounter is, and has been, a pure speculation
– with the exception (discussed in Part 1) of recent and remarkable
developments in advancing astrophysics that are in process of converting
the speculation into something akin to a semi-concrete hypothesis
of actual possibility.
In
any event, if mind, mind powers, and intelligence within the context
of another species, perhaps more powerful than our own, needed to
be understood, the process of doing so would ALSO mean that deeper
knowledge of the mind quanta of our own species would have to be illuminated
more clearly and intimately.
“Another
species,” of course, can easily refer to one that is extraterrestrial,
largely because we do not experience here on Earth another species
equipped with mind-power-intelligence that is commensurate with our
own.
The
historical human experience on Earth has merely been to encounter
other social orders, the various patterns of which all download from
the mind-mental-intelligence attributes of our species as a whole.
Since
many aspects of our species mind have been denied authenticity within
the limiting contexts of this or that societal order, it cannot really
be said that fuller knowledge packages of mind itself have been achieved
beyond the limited sum of those contexts.
If,
however, our species were to encounter another species, especially
an extraterrestrial one “more developed” than ours, then
it would have to be concluded, at some point, that our own mind-mental-intelligence
attributes are, well, “less developed” BY COMPARISON.
It
is this COMPARISON, and evidence for it, that can be explored by hypothesis
and speculation – from which no conclusions need be drawn.