What I would like to know is how this 'energy' can be
tapped to do work (in time) with the energy source
unlimited. Seems a permanent magnetic field has an
infinite energy pool, but again it is static potential
energy. To tap the energy of this field we must
involve time, and therefore it becomes dynamic.. which
then can provide work when we tap it off. However,
in making this FREE B-Field dynamic, we have to provide
work in order to capture work. This is where WORK (as
in theory or experiments) needs to be concentrated.. to
make the Free B-field dynamic with least amount of work
and tape the field to produce more work that it took to
be able to tap it. This has not been done so far to
my knowledge, and not sure it can be done.. in theory
or experiment. John Bedini's work I thought was doing
this until the recent posts about the battery being the
actual 'overunity' apparatus instead of the permanent
free magnetic field.
Any comments on how to accomplish this?
v/r Ken Carrigan
>
> Carrigan writes:
> <<PS... Static to me infers DC! Not AC. Both leak electrons
> and AC of course more than DC.
> >>
>
> While I am no expert in electrodynamics, I agree that the term static
> generally refers to a DC potential.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but the accelerating
> potential of a CRT is
> in the region of 20 to 30 kV, DC - is it not? And the
> resulting electron
> beam, in the evacuated tube, is "steered" by a magnet field
> -- it is this
> magnetic field which is modulated to cause the repeated trace
> of the electron
> beam on the phosphor or the screen.
>
> And some further examples of a DC static charge causing
> motion: two pieces of
> plastic film wrap (for food storage), held in proximity, will
> attract each
> other - they have mass, and they move. And many plastic
> films have an
> intrinsic static charge, and are attracted to many other
> objects (if in close
> enough proximity)
>
> And second, an electret air filter for heating Air
> conditioning systems - a
> permanent electrostatic charge is inherent or induced in
> manufacture, in a
> plastic material woven into a filter - this permanent charge
> attracts and
> holds dust particles as they attempt to pass thru the filter, thus
> significantly increasing the performance of the filter.
>
> And further, a "negative ion generator" , which uses a high
> voltage DC
> applied to a point of metal, will not only cause dust to
> accumulate on the
> case of the region machine, but will also cause dust to
> accumulate on walls,
> and other objects in the vicinity (a few feet) from this high
> potential DC
> source.
>
> These examples are in response to Carrigan's previous
> statement that a static
> field cannot make anything move, nor perform any work.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> DMBoss1021
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------