My understanding is that either there's a preferred frame of reference
through which light moves, or there isn't. The MM experiment was such a
resounding blow against the aether because, although the effect observed
was not nil, it was extremely far beneath the result needed to confirm the
aether (approximately 2.5 %).
>
>You see, that is what KeelyNet uses as a given...that
>everything comes from and reduces back to aether/zpe...and
>when we learn to control gravity we will shortly thereafter
>be able to modify the technique to extract energy from the
>aether/zpe...and it also applies to health because it can be
>used to alter time to assist or promote healing and
>rejuvenation in the body...that's why our topics have always
>been free energy, gravity control and electronic health.
So aether and zero point energy are considered synonymous on keelynet?
Then that answers my question; thank you.
-Peter
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------