I know this list really deals ONLY with those anomalies or lets say
80% of it does. What I like to do is dissect the unknowns to see
if there is really something there or can it be accounted for by our
known laws.. just nobody picks it up. Sort of like 'street magic'
and you know it is not really voodoo or witchcraft, etc. Just have
to figure out how it was done by physical laws. Not saying that
everything is perfect and we all have it figured out but think of all
the 'think tanks' and Einstein's out here and others who have tried
but maybe not reported anomalous experiments.
Frankly I am just getting impatient waiting for valid anomalistic
experiments
that I can play with and validate. I know Jean-Louis Naudin has tried
all kinds of experiments and almost got some to give overunity, but to
date he too has not been able to achieve 'overunity'.
I know it is out there... Magnetics are what I think HAS to give energy
up somehow.. and Dirac functions have not been fully explored (Tesla
had the concept but today his coils are not the same).
In sort.. sorry for the negative email. What I read was simplified to
a battery being recharged on aether.
Now on the 10 year old girl experiment, it was not overunity in the least
and sure it ran, but take the whole experiment and make an energy balance
up just from start to finish. Someone else tried to justify an 'overunity'
experiment by 'comparison' to a <50% efficient experiment. Well his
experiment obtained 75% and whow.. he says then that 75%/50% gives 150%
efficiency. This is what I am perplexed with.. people stating something
that is not quiet true. To the laymen SURE! 150%!! But it is not..
I have also developed what I term Binary Coded Quantum Waves (IR&D)
where DC voltage is fed into a microcontroller and the digital output
fed to HFETs will achieve a HF fundamental carrier with a .02% distortion.
This would give PURE digital HF or below communications at high power
and with >98% efficiency. Compare that to what we have now.. it is some
200% overunity? No....
I am in pursuit of this overunity and free energy as I know it is also
just a matter of time.
I just hate sometimes the negativity towards educated people in that
"they are brainwashed in only tradition". If that where true we would
not have advanced technology as we do today. There is a lot of Research
and Development that pushes our technology into the future... just as
web links show this to be true. 95%? Of these break throughs are links
from very educated and degreed people.
With that... here is a real good paper on Aether... for Aether too I might
add. More than I could ever read, but probably all I could want to know.
http://208.55.129.251/aether.html
v/r Ken Carrigan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry W. Decker [mailto:jdecker@keelynet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 12:20 PM
To: interact@keelynet.com
Subject: Re: Battery recharge from Aether??
Hi Ken et al!
tsk, tsk, tsk....everything is known, give it all up because
it MUST have been detected by all these experts.....NOT.....
as pointed out in earlier posts, you guys with all that
great body of engineering and scientific knowledge cannot
EXPLAIN ALL THE ANOMALIES and DUPLICATE THEM AT WILL,
until you can, then its only a matter of time before this
stuff is locked down and some degree of understanding is
achieved,
so no matter how much is known, THERE IS FAR MORE THAT
REMAINS UNKNOWN, SO FAR,
the very purpose of this discussion list and KeelyNet is to
EVOKE questions and new ideas that will lead to those
changes....so it really does no good to use the 'we know it
all' excuse here, so forget about this idea...
sure, keep on believing that...
when the bubble bursts, you'll at least have an inkling and
a headstart over your peers because AT LEAST YOU MONITOR
such posts and activities...those guys will be completely
behind this new and completely radical 'state of the art'...
that's why it is SO IMPORTANT to continue to promote new
ideas, new insights, correlate them and ENCOURAGE
experiments, even by 10 year old girls who seem to know more
than all those engineers you tout...<g>....
this tendency of quenching new ideas and simple experiments
is a very puzzling thing, it is destructive to science and
technology and to my view is completely erroneous propaganda
that implies ONLY academics and corporate scientific think
tanks can bring about changes....what a fallacy...
those ideas WILL BE COMPLETELY destroyed when we get the
basic POP experiments that shows EVERYONE that simple
experiments can be carried out by ANYONE, EVEN 10 year old
GIRLS, that show weak anomalous effects which can be SCALED
up to useful applications....
the guy has a GREAT POINT and here is what John Bedini wrote
back;
--------------
Subject: Re: the ten year old, the bendini and adams motors,
and Bearden
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:48:53 -0700
From: "john1" <john1@nidlink.com>
To: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>
References: 1 , 2
Jerry
This is what I have been saying all along, I know that your
going to get it, this is what happens when you curve Space
Time the battery thinks it did not do any work. This is why
I wanted everybody to study this motor it's very important.
This little girls motor ran because of the little tickle
current going backwards in time (she did not know this or
did the Teachers, this is why they were scratching their
heads this transistor circuit leaks a little backwards to
the battery with the motor running.
John
-----------------------
Ken, I hope you don't have a heart attack or suffer some
kind of mental crash when this stuff finally does get out
and upsets all those academic and engineering applecarts....
"Carrigan, Ken" wrote:
>
> First prove (experimentally) that Aether exists....
>
> > I began to wonder last night if people have been viewing batteries the
> > wrong way. Perhaps, if Mr. Bearden is correct, and the batteries' energy
> > potential can be perpetually replenished as long as electrical
eqilibrium
> is
> > avoided, then perhaps a battery is more than just a provider of
electrons.
>
> Just think about the 100,000 scientist and chemists that are experts in
> research, design and making of batteries. From Nickel Metal Hydride to
> to lead acid, to carbon zinc. There are lots of different batteries
> ....snip.....
-- KeelyNet - From an Art to a Science Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com/discussion archives http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite, TX 75187 - 214.324.8741------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com> with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com> with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------