No reason in particular that I'm not stuck on GEET as
the only option...I know Paul and I think he's great
but the web is swamped with stuff about GEET.
With so much being available about GEET these days,
why join the herd and further confuse the issue?
I much prefer the lesser known material that needs to
see the light of day and hopefully get picked up,
copied and experimented with...
Lots of ways to skin a cat.
You seem to be particularly fixated on GEET..<g>...not
my business to ask why but its just there is SO MUCH
out there about it and a lot of people marketing it as
franchise distributor and all that jazz.
Some of the MANY sites;
www.geet.com/
www.friend.ly.net/GEET/
www.onelist.com/archive/geet-vortex-carb
members.xoom.com/jlnlabs/geet/html/geetdiag.htm
members.xoom.com/jlnlabs/geet/html/geetplans.htm
members.tripod.com/professor_shields/geet.htm
www2.ios.com/~cnfrmtn9/geet.html
and on and on and on...
We have MORE than covered GEET as per KeelyNet posts
at;
Geet is mentioned twice in this water/fuel doc;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/gunnhist.htm
Twice mentioned - Naudins experiment with GEET and
free GEET conversion plans at;
http://www.keelynet.com/index99.htm
and the posts on this very discussion list are at;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8187.html
and it came up with 31 OTHER mentions of GEET, so I
don't understand why you think its not sufficiently
covered.
Sounds like you need to start a GEET discussion list
so you can fill up on it..<g>..for hoots, looked it up
and guess what came up, a post to THIS discussion list
recommending the GEET discussion list as at;
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m6425.html
You must not have received the email threatening
repercussions for anyone who talked about GEET
publicly...<g>...JUST KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--- chuck's corner <farrar@together.net> wrote:
> Jerry,
> ?
> curious..... I know I was able to reach you with an
> earlier post..is there a reason why people (and you
> as well it would seem) have been quite close-lipped
> about the Geet fuel processor or its potential place
> in our present predicament regarding fuel prices...?
> or is there another reason I'm not aware of....? I
> for one find it remarkable but am having to re-
> evaluate my 'conventional wisdoms' regarding engines
> as this controls fuel consumption as well as heat by
> restricting flow ....
=====
=================================
Please respond to jdecker@keelynet.com
as I am writing from my work email of
jwdatwork@yahoo.com.........thanks!
=================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------