Re: Flame speaker

Bill Perry ( (no email) )
Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:10:35 -0800

Hi, All!!!
I was reading the "Optoelectronics Projects" one of the "Engineer's
Mini-Notebook" segments by Forrest M. Mims III. He describes a really cool
project called a light listener that uses an Infrared photo-diode, which
modulates voltage input into a basic audio amplifier. This produces really
nice sound effects. Buzzing from fluorescent lamps and TV screens/ computer
monitors, ringing from car headlights when the car goes over bumps in the
road, but the most intriguing sound was that of a steady candle flame
(produces a soft rushing sound).
I will be outfitting something similiar, except instead of a speaker or
earphone, the audio amp will be used to drive the electrostatic plates for
the flame speaker. So this thing basically should provide a fair amount of
feedback into the candle flame, and either increase the candle rushing noise
to normal audible levels, or possibly if you used the right amp
configuration, you could boost it in the right phase, and might increase the
burning of the flame to make it combost faster.
Thanks.
BillP
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry W. Decker <jdecker@keelynet.com>
To: <interact@keelynet.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Flame speaker

> Hi Joseph et al!
>
> I was wondering how long it would be before someone
> mentioned that....<g>...flame speakers have been around
> since the 1800's....after all, flame is ionized so by
> using an electrostatic modulation, its a simple
> matter to jerk it back and forth at audio rates.
>
> They were even sold commercially as speakers back in the
> 1960's/1970's...I used to know a lawyer who had a pair
> he paid something like $1500 for them...they used propane
> gas to produce a flame, had two electrostatic deflection
> plates and a cavity to reflect the sound....the response
> is said to be from 0 up to light...<g>...I never heard
> them in operation.
>
> I don't the efficiency of those would be sufficient to
> fulfill the needs of the original post...everything
> resonates to every frequency, but is most efficient when
> near resonance....so even piezo transducers can carry all
> the frequencies you would need and would of course have
> a 'Q' at their maximum resonance.
>
> The Chladni tables, akin to the early 'eidophones', had
> sound sung or spoken into a horn that focused the sound
> onto a plate so it could vibrate and move sound and form
> the beautiful geometries now called 'cymatics'...so a
> speaker under such a surface or a piezo affixed to it
> could be driven to produce the many fascinating patterns.
>
> Of course one or more FIXED tones will generate very stable
> geometries although altering their relationships to each
> other will produce motion and even patterns such as swirls,
> expansion, etc...as so beautifully shown by the late Dr.
> Hans Jenny and more recently by Russian scientist Dr. Yuri
> Ivanov as posted here;
>
> http://216.60.190.54/spider/b-100e.htm
>
> another related post (after a fashion);
>
> http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/index.html?mID=2350
> t
>
> There are many marvelous ideas and devices that have long
> been lost or forgotten....such as 'musical fountains' where
> water jets spray at audio rates to make music simply as
> long as the fountain runs.
>
> Joseph Hiddink wrote:
> >
> > I remember reading something about the "Singing
> > Flame" in old Radio/Electronics magazines, and
> > that was already in the twenties or thirties. I
> > believe I read it in Hugo Gernsback Magazine.
> > So, how come that Nasa invented that?
> > Joe Hiddink vliegschotel@yahoo.com
> >
> > --- MILLENNIUM PROJECT <infonet@home.com> wrote:
> > > I searched nasa's site and couldn't find
> > > anything about flame speakers.I
> > > found one page with a definition of a flame
> > > speaker.Nothing else
> > > yet.Heres the page I found
> > >
> > http://www.exploratorium.edu/xref/exhibits/flame_speaker.html
> > > This website has some intresting index.
> > >
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Warren writes:
> > > Yes, that is it. I will try and find my files
> > > on it and cut you a
> > > copy with diagrams. E-mail me if I should
> > > forget.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To leave this list, email
> > > <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > > with the body text: leave Interact
> > > list archives and on line subscription
> > > forms are at
> > > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> > http://im.yahoo.com
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> > with the body text: leave Interact
> > list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> > http://keelynet.com/interact/
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> KeelyNet - From an Art to a Science
> Jerry W. Decker - http://www.keelynet.com/
> discussion archives http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/
> KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716 - Mesquite, TX 75187 - 214.324.8741
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
> with the body text: leave Interact
> list archives and on line subscription forms are at
> http://keelynet.com/interact/
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------