Differences between electricity and aether

Jerry Wayne Decker ( jwdatwork@yahoo.com )
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 07:09:38 -0800 (PST)

Hi Folks!

A good article going into how aether can be tapped
just like electricity if we disregard the erroneuous
laws of thermodynamics.

The article pivots on a key understanding which
orthodox thinkers simply cannot grasp, that it is the
CONVERSION of ambient energy to other forms that we
are seeking,

NOT the CREATION of something from NOTHING that so
many think we seek;

http://www.borderlands.com/archives/arch/thermo.html

....it is important, for our purposes, to be reminded
that this new idea expressed as the "First Law of
Thermodynamics" consists of a number of overlapping
ideas and assumptions that can be expressed as
follows:

1) Perpetual motion machines are impossible

2) The nature of heat is reduced to the random motions
of molecular matter

3) Energy can be changed from one form to another
without any explanation as to how this conversion is
actually accomplished in any specific case

4) Energy is not created in or destroyed by its
passage through a mechanism

5) All forms of energy behave the same way

While it should be understood that most known chemical
processes, standard electrical equipment and heat
generally do behave this way, the Etheric Energy Field
of the planet does not.

The Etheric Energy Field behaves in direct opposition
to the more generalized understandings of the "Second
Law of Thermodynamics" and this fact is backed up by
considerable experimental data.

When the discussion is limited to the behavior of heat
in closed systems, the "Second Law of Thermodynamics"
is a well tested and accurate description of what
happens under those circumstances.

It is when it is incorrectly assumed that all forms of
energy behave this way and that enclosure of the
system is possible at all levels, that grossly false
conclusions can be drawn from what started out as
experimentally derived observations.

The scientific community-at-large obviates these
problems simply by denying the existence of the
Etheric Energy Field because it doesn't fit within
their intellectual model.

The line of logic embodied in the "Laws of
Thermodynamics" is flawless. The problem doesn't exist
in the logic, but it does illustrate that logic alone
is not enough to reveal the truth.

The problem exists in certain interpretations of these
"Laws." Let's go back and look at the "First Law"
again in light of our "over-unity" discussion.

"Energy can be changed from one form to another, but
it is neither created nor destroyed." This seems
simple enough to understand. Underneath the surface,
however, there is an assumption that this also means
that energy will not spontaneously appear or disappear
from the system.

This is also a necessary condition if conservation of
energy is to be satisfied LOCALLY as well as
UNIVERSALLY.

Normal electricity always flows from high potential to
low potential and usually requires metallic conductors
to flow along. On the other hand, "static electricity"
does not discharge in the same way, and readily moves
and collects on both conductors and insulators.

Because "static electricity" behaves more like ether
than electricity, I am going coin a term for this form
of energy when it is present in wires and circuits. I
call it "ETHERICITY", to distinguish it from
electricity all together.

In some ways, ethericity behaves like electricity and
in some ways it behaves differently. This has been the
source of confusion.

Here then are some of the known characteristics of
ethericity that engineers and inventors should
understand:

1) Ethericity can be accumulated from the ground or
the air at almost any location

2) It can be "reflected" down wires (this is not
conduction)

3) Flows of ethericity can be interrupted by diodes
and Mosfet type devices

4) Its potential can be raised or lowered in air core
transformers

5) It can be stored in capacitors

6) It will operate neon style lighting, when the
potential is high enough

7) It can create fields of opposing forces in coils
and motor windings

=====

=================================
Please respond to jdecker@keelynet.com
as I am writing from my work email of
jwdatwork@yahoo.com.........thanks!
=================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------