Re: BioEnergy, Healing, Gravity - Related?

Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Sat, 01 Jan 2000 17:27:17 -0600

Hi DM et al!

I know this thread is more technically referring to
photobiology, but my email messed up so I don't have a
response header to your primary physics thread.

So I looked back in my list and found this which fits nearly
perfectly since the inert gas tubes were originally designed
for healing though it appears, if your results can be
duplicated they have other uses.

I've been checking out your website (which, BTW, is very
informative) and need to congratulate you on this page;

http://hometown.aol.com/dmboss1021/NEWPH/Index.html

It offers the clearest description of how the inert gas
beams manifest that I've ever seen. Most people just point
the thing and SAY you should be able to feel the
energy...I've never been able to and relegated it heretofore
to a 'lack of sensivity' from my 4th generation Texan
redneck genetics..<g>..

But now with your indication that the beams emanate FROM THE
MIDDLE OUTWARDS, I'll have to try it again. I felt nothing
from the ends of tubes charged with upwards of 300 psi yet
I've seen people hold their hand on the end and claim they
felt heat.....yeah...uh, right....by rights, I should have
did a blind test making the 'sense' it through a wall book
or something where they would not know the location of the
beam, but I didn't want to be confrontational in the
setting.

But I think in future, I will definitely question such
claims and make them prove it not only to us but to
THEMSELVES as they are either deluded or hypersensitive or
just wanting to believe...that is just the kind of approach
I think everyone should take when people claim to experience
such effects from crystals, pyramids, these inert gas tubes,
etc...it is certainly testable and people balk or become
offended, then to my view, they KNOW they are faking it and
don't want to be so clearly exposed....just tell the truth
and let's cut through the crap...<g>..

Anyway, back to your website and this particular page.

You keep referring to LOWER PHASE. Which definition of
phase are you using?

The one relating to the develpmental phase of a project,
such as phase I, phase II, phase III, indicating a sequency
of development based on the successes of earlier experiments

OR

the phase of a wave around 360 degrees stretched out to form
the wave?

To my view of your excellent drawings the PHASE, if its
wavelengthe would be 180 degree phase shifted because of the
LENGTH of the tube, where a wave would travel from one end
to the other, then reflect to cancel in the middle,
indicating a true SCALAR process which would emanate from
the middle as you portray.

It makes more sense to envision it as a disk that radiates
from the middle and I have no way of indicating it is TRULY
a beam as you draw it. I guess my question is, do you have
any idea WHY it forms a beam at the specific point?

I mean if you view it as a circle around the middle of the
tube which would represent a scalar DISK, you indicate a
beam and what determines at what phase the beam would
emanate...such at 90/270 or 0/180 or any other two opposite
sides??

It is very interesting. One other observation...it follows
that the more of these beams you have focused on a given
region, the greater would be the effect.

Joe Parr and Dan Davidson have done experiments with
pyramids and other shapes which show that the energy emitted
from one pyramid is the same no matter what the size! That
means that the more of these structures, whether pyramidal
or whatever, the more intense will be the energy accumulated
and focused.

I'm sure you catch the full meaning..................and
won't elucidate here just yet...<g>....

Just had to commend you on the page and I need to post it on
the links as a great clarification of how inert gas tubes
work and how you can experiment with them...I do wish you'd
tone down the red alerts..<g>..on that particular color of
background, they hurt my eyes...but I understand the need
for the caveats and it is always a good precaution to warn
if there might be dangers...

DMBoss1021@aol.com wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I found an interesting tidbit in the hard copy of the Jan 2000 issue of
> Discover Magazine: under the Heading "The Year in Weird Science":
>
> >>LIGHT ME UP, SCOTTY - Astronauts must be careful shaving because nicks and
> other minor wounds do not heal well in space. For unknown reasons, the
> mitochondria that power cells work poorly in zero gravity. But last
> September, Harry Whelan, a neurologist at the Medical College of Wisconsin at
> Milwaukee, reported that irradiating the mitochondria with infrared light
> prompted them to go back to work.

--      Jerry Wayne Decker  -  jdecker@keelynet.com             http://www.keelynet.com             from an Art to a Science   Voice : (214)324-8741 -  FAX : (214)324-3501             KeelyNet - PO BOX 870716        Mesquite - Republic of Texas - 75187

------------------------------------------------------------- To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com> with the body text: leave Interact list archives and on line subscription forms are at http://keelynet.com/interact/ -------------------------------------------------------------