--------------E766280E9F4FB1ADB419CE73
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <3847474A.2947DF41@csrlink.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 23:30:03 -0500
From: "Michael S. Johnston" <enki@csrlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en]C-NECCK (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RNHood2786@aol.com
Subject: Re: Water, Part 5 (Merry Christmas)
References: <0.640ea3bd.25789892@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
ooops sorry. I don't think that is going to adversely affect the general idea
that I am trying to put together here though.
MJ
RNHood2786@aol.com wrote:
> Better look again at your statement that Aluminum is a better conductor than
> copper. Aluminum has a resistivity of 2.8 microhms per cc and copper has a
> resistivity of 1.7, considerably less than Aluminum.
--------------E766280E9F4FB1ADB419CE73--
-------------------------------------------------------------
To leave this list, email <listserver@keelynet.com>
with the body text: leave Interact
list archives and on line subscription forms are at
http://keelynet.com/interact/
-------------------------------------------------------------